| Literature DB >> 31640179 |
Yang Wang1, Wenjun Guo2,3, Yue Liu4, Jifeng Wang5, Meiling Fan6, Hongyu Zhao7, Shengxu Xie8, Yajuan Xu9.
Abstract
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability worldwide. Gross saponins of Tribulus terrestris fruit (GSTTF) has been used for neuroprotective therapy on convalescents of ischemic stroke. But the related therapeutic mechanisms have not yet been well investigated. This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of GSTTF on ischemic stroke using metabolomics coupled with network pharmacology analysis. The rat urine sample was collected and profiled by an LC-MS-based metabolomics approach. The pathway analysis was performed based on the highlighted biomarkers, then the network pharmacology approach was applied to screen the potential therapeutic targets of GSTTF. Metabolomics analysis showed that a series of metabolic perturbations occurred in the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) group compared with the sham group. Gross saponins of Tribulus terrestris fruit can change the MCAO-induced urine metabolic deviations in a reverse manner via regulating multiple metabolic pathways. Two proteins, inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) and glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3B), were highlighted by the network pharmacology analysis, which may be the potential therapeutic targets for the GSTTF against ischemic stroke. This study provides an overview of the mechanism of MCAO-induced ischemic stroke and investigates the efficacy of GSTTF in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Further study is needed to reveal its underlying mechanisms more clearly.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS-based metabolomics; gross saponins of Tribulus terrestris; ischemic stroke; network pharmacology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31640179 PMCID: PMC6835270 DOI: 10.3390/metabo9100240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Effects of Gross saponins of Tribulus terrestris fruit (GSTTF) on middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rats: neurobehavioral score (A), infarct area (B), and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining of brain (C). ## p < 0.01, the model group versus the sham group; ** p < 0.01, the GSTTF-treated group versus the model group.
Figure 2The PCA score plot of all samples (○) with the highlight of the QC (♦) sample in positive ion mode (A) and negative ion mode (B).
Figure 3The PLS-DA score plots of the sham group (▲), model group (●), and GSTTF-treated group (♦) based on the data acquired in positive ion mode (A,C) and negative ion mode (B,D).
Annotated endogenous metabolites and their change trends in urine.
| Annotated Metabolite | Ionization | Retention Time (min) | Detected | Adducts | KEGG ID | Model/Sham | GSTTF/Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leucine | P | 0.708 | 132.1017 | [M + H]+ | C00123 | ↑# | ↓ |
| Citric acid | P | 0.527 | 193.0339 | [M + H]+ | C00158 | ↓# | ↑ |
| Citric acid | N | 0.497 | 191.0190 | [M − H]− | C00158 | ↓# | ↑** |
| Isoleucine | P | 0.659 | 132.1016 | [M + H]+ | C00407 | ↓# | ↑ |
| P | 2.928 | 220.1174 | [M + H]+ | C00864 | ↑# | ↓ | |
| Hippuric acid | P | 4.044 | 180.0653 | [M + H]+ | C01586 | ↓## | ↑* |
| Hippuric acid | N | 3.999 | 178.0502 | [M − H]− | C01586 | ↓# | ↑ |
| P | 0.571 | 130.0497 | [M + H]+ | C01879 | ↓### | ↑ | |
| Citraconic acid | N | 0.416 | 129.0182 | [M − H]− | C02226 | ↓## | ↑ |
| trans-Aconitic acid | N | 0.591 | 173.0083 | [M − H]− | C02341 | ↓## | ↓ |
| N-Acetyl- | P | 5.387 | 174.1122 | [M + H]+ | C02710 | ↑## | ↓ |
| N-Acetyl- | N | 6.020 | 172.0972 | [M − H]− | C02710 | ↑## | ↓** |
| 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaric acid | N | 0.525 | 161.0447 | [M − H]− | C03761 | ↑## | ↓ |
| 6-Hydroxycaproic acid | N | 4.550 | 131.0704 | [M − H]− | C06103 | ↑### | ↓ |
| N-Acetyl- | N | 0.531 | 216.0986 | [M − H]− | C15532 | ↑### | ↓** |
| 7-Aminomethyl-7-deazaguanine | P | 1.322 | 180.0876 | [M + H]+ | C16675 | ↑# | ↓ |
| Pentahomomethionine | P | 9.059 | 220.1361 | [M + H]+ | C17229 | ↑## | ↓ |
#p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, the model group versus the sham group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, the GSTTF-treated group versus the model group. P, positive ion mode; N, negative ion mode.
Figure 4Heat map (A) visualizing the changes in the intensities of potential biomarkers and bubble plot (B) of the main perturbed pathway response to MCAO.
Figure 5The “compound-target-disease” network (A) and “target-metabolite” network (B) based on 15 compounds, 22 targets, 7 diseases, and 9 metabolites.