Literature DB >> 31639369

Pregnant? Validity of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in four states, and characteristics associated with pregnancy checkbox errors.

Andrea Catalano1, Nicole L Davis1, Emily E Petersen1, Christopher Harrison2, Lyn Kieltyka3, Mei You4, Elizabeth J Conrey5, Alexander C Ewing1, William M Callaghan1, David A Goodman6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality rates in the United States appear to be increasing. One potential reason may be increased identification of maternal deaths after the addition of a pregnancy checkbox to the death certificate. In 2016, 4 state health departments (Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, and Ohio) implemented a pregnancy checkbox quality assurance pilot, with technical assistance provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The pilot aimed to improve accuracy of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates and resultant state maternal mortality estimates.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the validity of the pregnancy checkbox on the death certificate, and to describe characteristics associated with errors using 2016 data from a 4-state quality assurance pilot.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Potential pregnancy-associated deaths were identified by linking death certificates with birth or fetal death certificates from within 1 year preceding death or by pregnancy checkbox status. Death certificates that indicated that the decedent was pregnant within 1 year of death via the pregnancy checkbox, but that did not link to a birth or fetal death certificate, were referred for active follow-up to confirm pregnancy status by either death certifier confirmation or medical record review. Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine the distributions of demographic characteristics by pregnancy confirmation category (confirmed pregnant, confirmed not pregnant, and unable to confirm). We compared the proportion confirmed pregnant and confirmed not pregnant within age, race/ethnicity, pregnancy checkbox category, and certifier type categories using a Wald test of proportions. Binomial and Poisson regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios for having an incorrect pregnancy checkbox (false positive, false negative) by age group, race/ethnicity, pregnancy checkbox category, and certifier type.
RESULTS: Among 467 potential pregnancy-associated deaths, 335 (72%) were confirmed pregnant via linkage to a birth or fetal death certificate, certifier confirmation, or review of medical records. A total of 97 women (21%) were confirmed not pregnant (false positives) and 35 (7%) were unable to be confirmed. Women confirmed pregnant were significantly younger than women confirmed not pregnant (P < .001). Deaths certified by coroners and medical examiners were more likely to be confirmed pregnant than confirmed not pregnant (P = .04). The association between decedent age category and false-positive status followed a dose-response relationship (P < .001), with increasing prevalence ratios for each increase in age category. Death certificates of non-Hispanic black women were more likely to be false positive, compared with non-Hispanic white women (prevalence ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.01, 1.96). The sensitivity of the pregnancy checkbox among these 4 states in 2016 was 62% and the positive predictive value was 68%.
CONCLUSION: We provide a multi-state analysis of the validity of the pregnancy checkbox and highlight a need for more accurate reporting of pregnancy status on death certificates. States and other jurisdictions may increase the accuracy of their data used to calculate maternal mortality rates by implementing quality assurance processes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maternal health; maternal mortality; pregnancy checkbox; quality assurance; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31639369      PMCID: PMC7056489          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  The check box: determining pregnancy status to improve maternal mortality surveillance.

Authors:  A P MacKay; R Rochat; J C Smith; C J Berg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Underreporting of pregnancy-related mortality in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Cynthia Berg; Marie-Helene Bouvier-Colle; Mika Gissler; Margaret Harper; Angela Nannini; Sophie Alexander; Katherine Wildman; Gerard Breart; Pierre Buekens
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Maternal mortality and related concepts.

Authors:  Donna L Hoyert
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 3       Date:  2007-02

4.  Checking the pregnancy checkbox: Evaluation of a four-state quality assurance pilot.

Authors:  Anna E C Daymude; Andrea Catalano; Dave Goodman
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Contribution of maternal age and pregnancy checkbox on maternal mortality ratios in the United States, 1978-2012.

Authors:  Nicole L Davis; Donna L Hoyert; David A Goodman; Ashley H Hirai; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011-2013.

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Carla Syverson; Kristi Seed; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Trends in Maternal Mortality by Sociodemographic Characteristics and Cause of Death in 27 States and the District of Columbia.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Marie E Thoma
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Challenges and Opportunities in Identifying, Reviewing, and Preventing Maternal Deaths.

Authors:  Amy St Pierre; Julie Zaharatos; David Goodman; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Quality improvement and practice-based research in neurology using the electronic medical record.

Authors:  Demetrius M Maraganore; Roberta Frigerio; Nazia Kazmi; Steven L Meyers; Meredith Sefa; Shaun A Walters; Jonathan C Silverstein
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10
View more
  10 in total

1.  Association of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index With Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Among Medicaid Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Heather A Frey; Robert Ashmead; Alyssa Farmer; Yoshie H Kim; Cynthia Shellhaas; Reena Oza-Frank; Rebecca D Jackson; Maged M Costantine; Courtney D Lynch
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Rural-Urban Differences in Maternal Mortality Trends in the United States, 1999-2017: Accounting for the Impact of the Pregnancy Status Checkbox.

Authors:  Lauren M Rossen; Katherine A Ahrens; Lindsay S Womack; Sayeedha F G Uddin; Amy M Branum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.363

3.  Homicide During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in the United States, 2018-2019.

Authors:  Maeve Wallace; Veronica Gillispie-Bell; Kiara Cruz; Kelly Davis; Dovile Vilda
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 4.  Need for Improved Collection and Harmonization of Rural Maternal Healthcare Data.

Authors:  Donna A Santillan; Heather A Davis; Elissa Z Faro; Boyd M Knosp; Mark K Santillan
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 1.966

5.  County-Level Associations Between Pregnancy-Related Mortality Ratios and Contextual Sociospatial Indicators.

Authors:  Chloe M Barrera; Michael R Kramer; Peter T Merkt; Emily E Petersen; Mary D Brantley; Lindsay Eckhaus; Jennifer L Beauregard; David A Goodman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

6.  Violence As a Direct Cause of and Indirect Contributor to Maternal Death.

Authors:  Maeve E Wallace; Norah Friar; Jane Herwehe; Katherine P Theall
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  COVID-19-Associated Deaths After SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Pregnancy - Mississippi, March 1, 2020-October 6, 2021.

Authors:  Laurin Kasehagen; Paul Byers; Kathryn Taylor; Theresa Kittle; Christine Roberts; Charlene Collier; Britney Rust; Jessica N Ricaldi; Jamilla Green; Lauren B Zapata; Jennifer Beauregard; Thomas Dobbs
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Trend and causes of maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death over seven decades in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Ka Wang Cheung; Mimi Tin Yan Seto; Weilan Wang; Chi Tao Ng; William Wing Kee To; Ernest Hung Yu Ng
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-07-06

9.  Causes contributing to the excess maternal mortality risk for women 35 and over, United States, 2016-2017.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Marie Thoma; Eugene Declercq; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improving US maternal mortality reporting by analyzing literal text on death certificates, United States, 2016-2017.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Marie Thoma; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.