| Literature DB >> 31639141 |
Ines Ksentini1, Houda Gharsallah1, Maryam Sahnoun1, Christina Schuster2, Sirine Hamli Amri1, Rim Gargouri1, Mohamed Ali Triki1, Mohieddine Ksantini1, Andreas Leclerque2,3.
Abstract
Bioprospection for potential microbial biocontrol agents associated with three major insect pests of economic relevance for olive cultivation in the Mediterranean area, namely the olive fly, Bactrocera oleae, the olive moth, Prays oleae, and the olive psyllid, Euphyllura olivina, led to the isolation of several strains of readily cultivable Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria from Tunisian olive orchards. Determination of 16S ribosomal RNA encoding sequences identified the bacteria as members of the taxonomic genus Providencia (Enterobacterales; Morganellaceae). A more detailed molecular taxonomic analysis based on a previously established set of protein-encoding marker genes together with DNA-DNA hybridization and metabolic profiling studies led to the conclusion that the new isolates should be organized in a new species within this genus. With reference to their original insect association, the designation "Providencia entomophila" is proposed here for this hypothetical new taxon.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31639141 PMCID: PMC6805009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Bacterial isolates investigated in this study.
| Isolate designation | Material of origin | Geographic origin |
|---|---|---|
| Ouled Msallem, Jebeniana, Sfax, Tunisia; 34.972805 / 10.792768 | ||
| Ouled Msallem, Jebeniana, Sfax, Tunisia; 34.972805 / 10.792768 | ||
| El Amra, Sfax, Tunisia; | ||
| El Amra, Sfax, Tunisia; | ||
| Ouled Msallem, Jebeniana, Sfax, Tunisia; 34.972805 / 10.792768 | ||
| Olive fruit damaged by | Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia; | |
| Olive fruit damaged by | Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia; | |
| Kerkennah, Sfax, Tunisia; |
Fig 116S rRNA gene NJ tree.
Neighbor Joining phylogeny of Providencia bacteria as reconstructed from 16S ribosomal RNA encoding sequences. Terminal branches are labelled by genus, species and strain designations as well as GenBank accession numbers. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap support values. The size bar corresponds to 1% sequence divergence. An orthologous sequence from the closely related bacterium Proteus mirabilis has been used as outgroup.
Pairwise sequence similarity percentages.
| Pent | PretB | PretT | PverT | PalcT | PburT | PheiT | PrusT | PsneT | PstuT | PthaT | PhuaT | PsidC | 16S rRNA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99.8 | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.0 | 99.1 | 98.9 | 98.9 | 99.2 | 98.6 | 98.1 | 99.4 | 94.6 | Pent | ||
| 99.8 | 99.6 | 99.8 | 99.1 | 99.2 | 99.1 | 98.9 | 99.2 | 98.7 | 98.3 | 99.3 | 94.7 | PretB | ||
| 87.9 | 87.9 | 99.5 | 99.0 | 99.0 | 98.8 | 98.8 | 99.0 | 98.6 | 98.1 | 99.6 | 94.6 | PretT | ||
| 87.2 | 87.3 | 87.2 | 98.8 | 99.2 | 98.9 | 98.9 | 99.1 | 98.4 | 98.4 | 99.2 | 93.5 | PverT | ||
| 84.0 | 84.1 | 84.7 | 85.0 | 99.3 | 98.6 | 99.6 | 98.8 | 98.4 | 97.9 | 99.1 | 94.3 | PalcT | ||
| 83.5 | 83.4 | 83.2 | 82.9 | 82.4 | 99.2 | 99.3 | 99.0 | 98.4 | 98.0 | 98.7 | 94.3 | PburT | ||
| 83.2 | 83.3 | 83.4 | 83.4 | 82.6 | 82.9 | 98.4 | 98.5 | 98.0 | 98.0 | 98.5 | 93.4 | PheiT | ||
| 85.0 | 85.0 | 84.9 | 84.9 | 87.3 | 83.8 | 84.7 | 98.6 | 98.1 | 97.7 | 98.9 | 94.1 | PrusT | ||
| 82.4 | 82.4 | 83.0 | 82.5 | 82.2 | 84.8 | 82.6 | 84.2 | 98.4 | 98.1 | 99.0 | 94.2 | PsneT | ||
| 82.8 | 82.9 | 82.8 | 83.2 | 83.8 | 84.1 | 82.6 | 89.4 | 84.0 | 99.1 | 98.5 | 94.1 | PstuT | ||
| 86.1 | 86.1 | 87.0 | 86.9 | 87.1 | 86.7 | 86.1 | 87.5 | 87.1 | 89.6 | 98.1 | 93.8 | PthaT | ||
| 88.2 | 88.2 | 92.9 | 81.1 | 84.6 | 83.5 | 84.1 | 85.3 | 83.1 | 82.9 | 86.4 | 94.3 | PhuaT | ||
| ` | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | PsidC | |
| Pent | PretB | PretT | PverT | PalcT | PburT | PheiT | PrusT | PsneT | PstuT | PthaT | PhuaT | PsidC |
Pairwise (average) nucleotide sequence similarity percentages as calculated from a p-distance matrix for the16S rRNA gene and concatenated MLSA markers from Providencia bacteria. Values calculated from 16S ribosomal RNA encoding sequences are displayed in the upper right-hand, those from concatenated MLSA marker sequences in the lower left-hand part of the table. Deviations from the mean value found for averaged similarities (not shown) have in no case been superior to 0.1%. Not determined values are marked “n.d.”.
Fig 2Concatenated MLSA marker NJ tree.
Neighbor Joining (NJ) phylogeny of Providencia bacteria as reconstructed from concatenated MLSA marker nucleotide sequences. Terminal branches are labelled by genus, species and strain designations. GenBank accession numbers are given in the single gene trees, see S3–S7 Figs. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap support values. The size bar corresponds to 1% sequence divergence along phylogram branches. Clades A and B referred to in the text have been indicated at the right margin; clade B comprising the Tunisian isolates has been expanded into a cladogram for better resolution. Concatenated orthologous sequences from the closely related bacterium Proteus mirabilis have been used as outgroup.
Fig 3Comparison of metabolic profiles of Providencia bacteria as determined by the API 20E test system.
Upper part: Picture of an API20E test result obtained with isolate IO-23 after 48 h of incubation. Reactions are in the same order as indicated in the table below. Lower part: Graphic representation (heat chart) of API20E test results for Tunisian isolate IO-23 and type strains of further Providencia species. Activities indicated in the top row are as follows: beta-galactosidase (ONPG), L-arginine dihydrolase (ADH), L-lysine decarboxylase (LDC), L-ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), citrate utilization (CIT), H2S production (H2S), urease (URE), L-tryptophane desaminase (TDA), indole production (IND), acetoin production (VP), gelatinase (GEL), D-glucose fermentation/oxidation (GLU), D-mannitol fermentation/oxidation (MAN), inositol fermentation/oxidation (INO), D-sorbitol fermentation/oxidation (SOR), L-rhamnose fermentation/oxidation (RHA), D-sacchose/sucrose fermentation/oxidation (SAC), D-melibiose fermentation/oxidation (MEL), amygdalin fermentation/oxidation (AMY), L-arabinose fermentation/oxidation (ARA).
Fig 4Virulence bioassay: Mortality profiles.
Accumulated mortality profiles (in %) for virulence bioassays with four bacterial isolates against adult olive flies. Different line drawings correspond to the inoculation methods described under materials and methods.
Virulence bioassay: Accumulated mortalities and Tukey test.
| Treatment | IO-20 | IO-23 | IO-27 | IO-28 | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 ± 20 Aa | 100 ± 0 Aa | 73.33 ± 23.09 Aab | 80 ± 20 Aa | 20 ± 0 B | df = 4; F = 10,000; P = 0.002. | |
| 80 ± 20 Aa | 33.33 ± 23.09 Bb | 100 ± 0 Aa | 100 ± 0 Aa | 20 ± 0 B | df = 4; F = 22,857; P = 0.0001. | |
| 100 ± 0 Aa | 93.33 ± 11.55 Aa | 73.33 ± 11.55 Aab | 73.33 ± 23.09 Aa | 20 ± 0 B | df = 4; F = 18,500; P = 0.0001. | |
| 86.66 ± 23.09 Aa | 93.33 ± 11.55 Aa | 53.33 ± 11.55 ABb | 53.33 ± 23.09 ABa | 20 ± 0 B | df = 4; F = 9,850; P = 0.002. | |
| df = 3; F = 1.212; P = 0.374. | df = 3; F = 9.848; P = 0.005. | df = 3; F = 4.934; P = 0.032. | df = 3; F = 3.094; P = 0.090. | * |
Mortality rates (in %) determined for Providencia isolates assayed against adults of the olive fly. Values followed by the same letter are not statistically different using mean comparisons (Tukey test; P<0.05) angular transformed data. Capital letters represent comparisons within a row and lower case letters comparisons within a column. The asterisk “*” indicates that statistical analysis is not feasible (due to equal percentages for all data).