| Literature DB >> 31639005 |
Rui-Xu Yang1, Qin Pan1, Xiao-Lin Liu1, Da Zhou1, Feng-Zhi Xin1, Ze-Hua Zhao1, Rui-Nan Zhang1, Jing Zeng1, Liang Qiao2, Chun-Xiu Hu3, Guo-Wang Xu3, Jian-Gao Fan4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Keywords: Autophagy; Ceramides; High fat diet; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31639005 PMCID: PMC6805575 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-019-1118-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1The workflow of NASH model building and myriocin intervention
Effects of myriocin on body weight and serum biochemical indicators
| Control | HFD | HFD + myriocin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 566.7 ± 8.1 | 661.7 ± 15.9** | 614.0 ± 14.2# |
| ALP | 7.70 ± 0.68 | 8.40 ± 0.73 | 6.90 ± 0.35 |
| ALT | 37.40 ± 1.89 | 114.30 ± 26.71* | 32.70 ± 3.08# |
| AST | 92.10 ± 5.55 | 160.10 ± 16.79** | 87.80 ± 4.02## |
| TB | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 1.14 ± 0.22 | 0.78 ± 0.05 |
| DB | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.05* | 0.48 ± 0.04 |
| HDL | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01** | 0.34 ± 0.03# |
| LDL | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.04** | 0.22 ± 0.02## |
| TC | 0.71 ± 0.08 | 1.28 ± 0.12** | 0.81 ± 0.07## |
| TG | 1.59 ± 0.05 | 2.36 ± 0.18** | 2.09 ± 0.13 |
| FPG | 8.82 ± 0.39 | 8.51 ± 0.53 | 7.86 ± 0.30 |
Notes: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *: P<0.05, **: P<0.01 between HFD and control group; #: P<0.05, ##: P<0.01 between HFD and HFD + myriocin group
Fig. 2Inhibition of ceramide synthesis by myriocin alleviates NASH severity in the liver of HFD fed rats. a The gross appearance, H&E and Oil red O staining of liver. b Body weight of experimental rats; c-d Liver index and fat index at 16 weeks. e TG level in liver issues. f-h Histology score of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning. Data represents the mean ± SEM. (n = 10 per group); *: P < 0.05
Fig. 3Effect of myriocin on the de novo lipogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, triglyceride transportation and autophagy in the livers of HFD fed rats. a Expression of genes involved in fatty acid transport and oxidation in rat livers. b Expression of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis in rat livers. c Autophagy markers (LC-3, p62) in rat livers were examined by Western blot analysis
Fig. 4Effect of myriocin in HepG2 cells exposed to PA and OA. a TG content (μmol/g protein) in HepG2 cells co-cultured with PA + OA in the presence of myriocin (10 μM). b Oil Red O staining of HepG2 cells co-cultured with FFAs and myriocin (10 μM). c Expression of autophagy markers (LC-3, p62) was examined by Western blot in HepG2 cells co-cultured with FFAs and various concentrations of myriocin (0, 10, and 25 μM). d-e Quantitative analysis of LC-3 II/I ratio and p62/Actin ratio in c
General characteristics of the human study population
| Subgroup | Control | NAFL | NASH | CHB without NASH | CHB with NASH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 23 | 12 | 30 | 25 | 14 |
| Age | 39.91 ± 1.19 | 42.33 ± 3.57 | 38.20 ± 2.66 | 36.76 ± 2.59 | 39.00 ± 3.75 |
| Male (%) | 14 (60.87%) | 8 (66.67%) | 18 (60.00%) | 16 (64.00%) | 9 (64.29%) |
| Waistline | 80.96 ± 1.32 | 89.17 ± 1.19** | 92.34 ± 1.43** | 80.38 ± 3.28 | 90.00 ± 1.68** |
| BMI | 23.80 ± 0.52 | 26.74 ± 0.85** | 27.73 ± 0.61** | 22.61 ± 0.64 | 26.25 ± 0.53** |
| TB | 15.63 ± 0.79 | 13.48 ± 1.46 | 19.06 ± 3.32 | 25.30 ± 5.00 | 12.98 ± 0.85 |
| DB | 2.53 ± 0.19 | 4.86 ± 0.69** | 9.43 ± 3.03* | 11.15 ± 3.63* | 3.97 ± 0.40** |
| ALP | 69.30 ± 3.87 | 78.98 ± 9.89 | 95.38 ± 7.60** | 84.73 ± 8.66 | 96.01 ± 15.22* |
| γ-GT | 25.47 ± 4.51 | 31.76 ± 4.22 | 157.26 ± 56.40* | 82.35 ± 20.69* | 46.39 ± 9.02 |
| ALT | 24.17 ± 2.23 | 43.94 ± 5.70** | 99.55 ± 11.87** | 113.91 ± 30.18** | 59.13 ± 9.79** |
| AST | 21.17 ± 0.93 | 24.13 ± 1.54 | 60.32 ± 6.20** | 60.93 ± 12.75** | 41.73 ± 7.23** |
| TC | 4.60 ± 0.18 | 4.38 ± 0.26 | 4.84 ± 0.19 | 3.75 ± 0.17** | 5.43 ± 0.30* |
| TG | 1.37 ± 0.16 | 1.51 ± 0.24 | 2.05 ± 0.22* | 1.25 ± 0.15 | 2.70 ± 0.83* |
| HDL | 1.25 ± 0.04 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 1.17 ± 0.06 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | 1.31 ± 0.08 |
| LDL | 2.83 ± 0.15 | 2.78 ± 0.09 | 2.89 ± 0.13 | 2.32 ± 0.12* | 2.93 ± 0.22 |
| FPG | 5.00 ± 0.14 | 6.02 ± 0.57* | 5.67 ± 0.30 | 4.83 ± 0.21 | 6.31 ± 0.84 |
| Stiffness | 4.35 ± 0.20 | 6.68 ± 0.97* | 12.20 ± 2.50** | 10.13 ± 1.44** | 7.64 ± 0.93** |
| CAP | 222.83 ± 7.98 | 280.42 ± 10.56** | 314.97 ± 9.27** | 241.43 ± 12.84 | 274.93 ± 12.38** |
Notes: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM
*:P < 0.05, **: P <0.01 vs control group
Fig. 5Ceramides were significantly elevated in NASH subjects. a Serum sphingolipids in normal subjects and patients with NAFL, NASH, CHB with or without NASH. b Analysis of specific ceramide species in five subgroups. c analysis of serum sphingolipids in control, non-NASH subjects (NAFL and CHB without NASH) and NASH subjects (NASH and CHB with NASH). d-h Comparison of specific ceramide species between the non-NASH subjects (NAFL and CHB without NASH) and the NASH subjects (NASH and CHB with NASH)