| Literature DB >> 31638947 |
Liyan Huang1, Li Shang1, Wenfang Yang2,3, Danyang Li1,4, Cuifang Qi1, Juan Xin1, Shanshan Wang1, Liren Yang1, Lingxia Zeng5, Mei Chun Chung1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There was a wider disparity in the diet characterization among most studies on diet and pregnancy outcomes in different countries, and the research in northern China is limited. Therefore, the purpose of the present study that was conducted in northwest China was to understand the dietary characteristics of periconceptional women and to explore the relationship between and specific dietary patterns with adverse pregnancy outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse pregnancy outcomes; Chinese women; Factor analysis; Nested case-control study; Periconceptional dietary patterns; Starchy food
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31638947 PMCID: PMC6802140 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2524-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Equilibrium test of demographic characteristics between the case and control groups
| Total | Overall adverse pregnancy outcomes | χ2 | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | Case( | Control( | |||
| Age | |||||
| ≤ 25 | 25 (8.3) | 1 (1.6) | 24 (10.1) | 16.957 | 0.001* |
| 26–30 | 173 (57.7) | 31 (49.2) | 142 (59.9) | ||
| 31–35 | 77 (25.7) | 19 (30.2) | 58 (24.5) | ||
| > 35 | 25 (8.3) | 12 (19.0) | 13 (5.5) | ||
| Residence | |||||
| suburb/rural | 276 (92.0) | 54 (85.7) | 222 (93.7) | 4.281 | 0.041* |
| city | 24 (8.0) | 9 (14.3) | 15 (6.3) | ||
| Education | |||||
| junior high school or below | 19 (6.3) | 12 (11.1) | 12 (5.1) | 3.176 | 0.204 |
| senior high school or graduate | 126 (42.0) | 102 (38.1) | 102 (43.0) | ||
| undergraduate or above | 155 (50.7) | 123 (50.8) | 123 (51.9) | ||
| Economic situation a (per month) | |||||
| poor level | 33 (10.7) | 10 (15.9) | 23 (11.0) | 1.162 | 0.559 |
| moderate level | 217 (73.7) | 44 (69.8) | 173 (73.0) | ||
| good level | 50 (15.6) | 9 (14.3) | 34 (16.0) | ||
| Occupation | |||||
| peasants | 19 (6.3) | 6 (9.5) | 13 (5.5) | 1.368 | 0.242 |
| others | 281 (93.7) | 57 (90.5) | 224 (94.5) | ||
| Smoking | |||||
| yes | 5 (1.67) | 3 (4.8) | 2 (0.8) | 4.662 | 0.031* |
| no | 295 (98.3) | 60 (95.2) | 235 (99.2) | ||
| Alcohol intake | |||||
| yes | 8 (2.7) | 5 (7.9) | 3 (1.3) | 8.553 | 0.003* |
| no | 292 (97.3) | 58 (92.1) | 234 (98.7) | ||
a The poor, moderate and good levels of economic status were defined as the monthly household income per capita were less than or equal to 4000 RMB (581.3 dollars), 4001 to 12,000 RMB (581.4 to 1744 dollars) and more than 12000RMB (1744 dollars), respectively
* p < 0.05
The association between basic characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes
| Overall adverse pregnancy outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | OR(95% CI) | OR(95% CI)a | |
| Age | |||
| ≤ 25 | 1 (4.0) | 0.19 (0.025,1.465) | 0.184 (0.023, 1.485) |
| 26–30 | 31 (17.9) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 31–35 | 19 (24.7) | 1.501 (0.785, 2.867) | 1.438 (0.712, 2.902) |
| > 35 | 12 (48.0) | 4.228 (1.762,10.149)* | 4.743 (1.786,12.599)* |
| Residence | |||
| suburb/rural | 54 (19.6) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| city | 9 (37.5) | 2.467 (1.025, 5.937) * | 2.192 (0.682, 7.041) |
| Education | |||
| junior high school or below | 7 (36.8) | 2.474 (0.896, 6.835) | 0.671 (0.153, 2.940) |
| senior high schoolor graduate | 24 (19.0) | 0.998 (0.547, 1.821) | 0.863 (0.434, 1.716) |
| undergraduate or above | 29 (19.1) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Economic situation (per month) | |||
| poor level | 8 (25.8) | 1.075 (0.312, 9.694) | 1.153 (0.322, 4.123) |
| moderate level | 41 (19.2) | 0.733 (0.342, 1.567) | 0.827 (0.362, 1.887) |
| good level | 11 (24.4) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Occupation | |||
| peasants | 6 (31.6) | 1.814 (0.661, 4.980) | 1.493 (0.375, 5.945) |
| others | 57 (20.3) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Smoking | |||
| yes | 3 (60.0) | 62.142 (8.931,432.397)* | 59.201 (6.877,369.251)* |
| no | 7 (2.37) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Alcohol intake | |||
| yes | 5 (62.5) | 6.724 (1.562, 28.952) * | 6.583 (1.337, 26.589) * |
| no | 3 (1.03) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
a Multivariate regression analysis and adjustment of age and residence, economic situation, smoking and alcohol intake
* p < 0.05
The association between nutritional status and nutrient supplementation and adverse pregnancy outcomes
| Total | Overall adverse pregnancy outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | OR(95%CI) | OR(95%CI)a | |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI | ||||
| emaciation | 44 (14.9) | 6 (13.6) | 0.735 (0.289,1.873) | 0.699 (0.247,1.982) |
| normal | 198 (66.2) | 35 (17.7) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| overweight or obesity | 57 (19.01) | 22 (38.6) | 2.927 (1.534,5.587)* | 2.412 (1.143,5.089)* |
| Nutrient supplement before pregnancy | ||||
| short term and small dose | 205 (69.0) | 43 (21.0) | 1.150 (0.314, 4.219) | 0.815 (0.173,3.836) |
| short term but large dose | 12 (4.0) | 2 (16.7) | 0.867 (0.121, 6.215) | 1.402 (0.160,12.25) |
| long term but small dose | 64 (21.6) | 14 (21.9) | 1.213 (0.303, 4.863) | 1.049 (0.206,5.351) |
| long term and large dose | 16 (5.4) | 3 (18.8) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Nutrient supplement of first trimester | ||||
| short term and small dose | 57 (19.4) | 18 (31.6) | 2.885 (1.262,6.593)* | 2.557 (0.810,8.068) |
| short term but large dose | 37 (12.6) | 6 (16.2) | 1.210 (0.417, 3.511) | 1.496 (0.480,4.664) |
| long term but small dose | 113 (38.5) | 25 (22.1) | 1.776 (0.835, 3.774) | 2.009 (0.672,6.006) |
| long term and large dose | 87 (29.6) | 12 (13.8) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Types of nutrients | ||||
| pure folic acid | 164 (56.3) | 40 (24.4) | 1.618 (0.904, 2.933) | 1.092 (0.417,2.863) |
| multivitamin with folic acid | 127 (43.7) | 21 (16.5) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
a Multivariate analysis and adjustment of age and residence, economic situation, smoking and alcohol intake
* p < 0.05
Fig. 1Associations between dietary patterns and adverse pregnancy outcomes during the three months before pregnancy (a) and the first trimester of pregnancy (b). The values presented are adjusted ORs (aOR) with 95% CIs and corresponded to the results derived from the multivariate analysis. The analysis was based on the noted covariates which were indicated in Tables 1 and 2. ORs adjusted for age, residence, economic situation, smoking and alcohol intake, and pre-pregnancy BMI. For the first trimester of pregnancy (b), ORs were additionally adjusted the nutrient supplementation