| Literature DB >> 31638925 |
P Fusco1, B Parisatto1, E Rampazzo2,3, L Persano2, C Frasson2, A Di Meglio3, A Leslz3, L Santoro4, B Cafferata4, A Zin2, E Cimetta2,5, G Basso2,3, M R Esposito6, G P Tonini1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma (NB) is a paediatric tumour of the sympathetic nervous system. Half of all cases are defined high-risk with an overall survival less than 40% at 5 years from diagnosis. The lack of in vitro models able to recapitulate the intrinsic heterogeneity of primary NB tumours has hindered progress in understanding disease pathogenesis and therapy response.Entities:
Keywords: Neuroblastoma; Patient-derived organoids; Preclinical model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31638925 PMCID: PMC6802324 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6149-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Establishment of NB-PDOs. Bright-field images of PDOs morphological changes on day 7, day 14 and day 40. The isolated cells formed compact 3D structure (left panel, magnification 10x, scale bar 100 μm) and PDOs increase in size along with the cultivation time (middle and right panel, magnification 4x, scale bar 600 μm)
Fig. 2Histological analysis of NB-PDOs. Histological examination was performed on 5 μm formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded PDO sections. Left panels, H&E staining. Middle panels, NB84a and SYP staining. Right panels, CHGA staining. Scale bar 50 μm, magnification 40x. Asterisks: Neurite Formation; Arrows: Primitive cells; Arrowhead: MKI areas
Fig. 3PDOs aCGH profiles. For each organoid, the x-axis of the graph represents the number of each chromosome, while the y-axis represents the extent of gain (red), loss (violet) or amplification (green peak) in logarithmic scale
Fig. 4a Limiting dilution assay of PDOs. The graph represents the percentage of wells without spheres as a function of the number of cells. b Western blot analysis of adrenergic (DBH, p75) and mesenchymal (VIMENTIN, YAP1) markers and stemness marker (LGR5). We confirmed the protein expression of MYCN in all PDOs. The grouping of blots is cropped from different parts of the same gel. The images are representative of three independent experiments
Table 1
| PDO1 | PDO2 | PDO3 | PDO4 | PDO5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD56 (NCAM) | 14.6 | 92.48 | 93.50 | 92.97 | 94.60 |
| CD133 | 58.4 | 1.70 | 3.60 | 2.4 | 2.67 |
| CD117 (c-kit) | 6.1 | 0.50 | 6.17 | 9.5 | 0.30 |
| CD24 | 10.7 | 93.74 | 93.48 | 93.35 | 96.78 |
| CD15-CD29-CD24+ (ND) | 0.04 | 70.81 | 72.16 | 77.63 | 91.47 |
| CD14 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
| CD20 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.35 | 0.75 | 0.95 |
| CD45 | 2.4 | 1.65 | 2.85 | 1.70 | 0.80 |
Data are presented as mean percentage of N = 3 independent experiments
Fig. 5Flow cytometry analysis. Flow cytometry analysis of CD133 surface marker (a) and CD29 versus CD24 surface markers (b) on PDOs. Plots on the left are representative of PDO1, plots on the right are representative of PDO3 and 4 respectively, resembling PDO2–5. The plots are representative of more than three independent experiments