Literature DB >> 31638737

Vascular complications associated with percutaneous left ventricular assist device placement: A 10-year US perspective.

Nilay Patel1, Akshit Sharma1, Tarun Dalia1, Aniket Rali1, Matthew Earnest1, Peter Tadros1, Mark Wiley1, Eric Hockstad1, Ashwani Mehta1, Axel Thors2, Kirk Hance2, Kamal Gupta1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices(p-LVADs). p-LVADs are being increasingly used during complex coronary interventions and for acute cardiogenic shock. These large bore percutaneous devices have a higher risk of vascular complications. We examined the vascular complication rates from the use of p-LVAD in a national database.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the National In-patient Sample (NIS) dataset from 2005 till 2015. We used the ICD-9-CM procedure codes 37.68 and 37.62 for p-LVAD placement regardless of indications. We investigated common vascular complications, defining them by the validated ICD 9 CM codes. χ2 test and t test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively for comparison.
RESULTS: A total of 31,263 p-LVAD placements were identified during the period studied. A majority of patients were male (72.68%) and 64.44% were white. The overall incidence of vascular complications was 13.53%, out of which 56% required surgical treatment. Acute limb thromboembolism and bleeding requiring transfusion accounted for 27.6% and 21.8% of all vascular complications. Occurrence of a vascular complication was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (37.77% vs. 29.95%, p < .001), length of stay (22.7 vs. 12.2 days, p < .001) and cost of hospitalization ($ 161,923 vs. $ 95,547, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of vascular complications with p-LVAD placement including need for vascular surgery. These complications are associated with a higher in-hospital, LOS and hospitalization costs. These findings should be factored into the decision-making for p-LVAD placement.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31638737     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  2 in total

Review 1.  Impella support as a bridge to heart surgery in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Shunsuke Saito; Ikuko Shibasaki; Taiki Matsuoka; Ken Niitsuma; Shotaro Hirota; Yasuyuki Kanno; Yuta Kanazawa; Masahiro Tezuka; Yusuke Takei; Go Tsuchiya; Taisuke Konishi; Koji Ogata; Hirotsugu Fukuda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

2.  Transradial access in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Stratified analysis by shock severity.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Abdulla A Damluji; Matthew W Sherwood; Carolyn Rosner; Alexander G Truesdell; Kelly C Epps; Edward Howard; Scott D Barnett; Anika Raja; Christopher R deFilippi; Charles E Murphy; Christopher M O'Connor; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.585

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.