It has been reported recently that bradykinin (BK) is involved in the regulation of various processes in cancer cells. However, its role and underlying mechanism of action in cervical cancer (CC) are still unknown. In the present study, it was revealed that BK promoted proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells, whereas bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist HOE140 had the inverse effect. Furthermore, it was confirmed that overexpression of bradykinin B2 receptor (B2R) facilitated the proliferation, migration, and invasion of BK‑treated CC cells, while knockdown of B2R had the opposite effect. Mechanistically, the present results revealed that the BK/B2R‑induced biological function of CC cells occured by activating STAT3 signaling pathways, and that knockdown of B2R or B2R antagonist had the opposite effects. Moreover, it was demonstrated that BK/B2R facilitated CC cell migration and invasion by upregulating the expression of the STAT3‑regulated products MMP2 and MMP9, while downregulating the expression of the pro‑apoptotic protein cleaved caspase‑9. Thus, the present findings revealed that BK promoted CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by binding to B2R via STAT3 signaling pathways.
It has been reported recently that bradykinin (BK) is involved in the regulation of various processes in cancer cells. However, its role and underlying mechanism of action in cervical cancer (CC) are still unknown. In the present study, it was revealed that BK promoted proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells, whereas bradykininB2 receptor antagonist HOE140 had the inverse effect. Furthermore, it was confirmed that overexpression of bradykininB2 receptor (B2R) facilitated the proliferation, migration, and invasion of BK‑treated CC cells, while knockdown of B2R had the opposite effect. Mechanistically, the present results revealed that the BK/B2R‑induced biological function of CC cells occured by activating STAT3 signaling pathways, and that knockdown of B2R or B2R antagonist had the opposite effects. Moreover, it was demonstrated that BK/B2R facilitated CC cell migration and invasion by upregulating the expression of the STAT3‑regulated products MMP2 and MMP9, while downregulating the expression of the pro‑apoptotic protein cleaved caspase‑9. Thus, the present findings revealed that BK promoted CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by binding to B2R via STAT3 signaling pathways.
Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Although screening for CC is widespread, over 500,000 new cases of CC were estimated to occur worldwide in 2018, thus ranking it as the second most common malignant tumor in females (1). With advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the five-year survival rate of patients receiving standardized treatment can reach 80%. However, once patients develop metastases, the five-year survival rate drops below 50% (2). Thus, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of CC development and identification of its critical signaling markers as potential targets for improved treatment strategies is crucial.Bradykinin (BK) is an active peptide that is generated by the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) (3). It has been reported that BK is involved in the regulation of various cellular processes in cancer cells, including cell proliferation and angiogenesis (4,5). BK also facilitates cancer migration and invasion by stimulating the activity of membrane matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and integrins (6,7). The effect of BK is mediated via two G protein-coupled receptors, B1 and B2, which have been pharmacologically characterized and defined by molecular cloning (8). Furthermore, recent studies have indicated that activation of the bradykininB2 receptor (B2R) by BK is involved in most BK-mediated biological actions (9–11). Studies performed by our group demonstrated that BK/B2R promoted angiogenesis of cervical cancer and facilitated tumorigenesis (12). In the present study, other underlying molecular mechanisms by which BK promotes tumor progression in CC were explored.Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is persistently activated in many cancers and animal cancer models (13). Studies have also shown that STAT3 is constitutively activated in CC and cervical high-grade lesions (14,15). STAT3Tyrosine705 phosphorylation actives this canonical pathway, and results in malignant transformation by promoting cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis (16–18). The breakdown of the basement membrane and remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are markers for the invasion and metastasis of malignant tumors. The degradation of ECM proteins is mainly accomplished by a variety of MMPs (19,20). Activated STAT3 upregulates MMP expression and activity (15,21) and downregulates expression of pro-apoptotic proteins (22), thus promoting metastasis and proliferation in many cancers. Therefore, the expression of BK and B2R was detected, and their relationship with STAT3 was explored in CC. The effect of BK treatment on CC cells was examined and the function of B2R was further characterized in BK-mediated effects. It was also demonstrated that BK promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells by activating STAT3 in vitro. These results highlighted the important role of BK/B2R in CC.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and cultures
Human cervical cancer cell lines (SiHa and HeLa) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). All the cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Transduction with lentiviruses
B2R-overexpressed and -knockdown cell lines were constructed as previously described (12). Target cells were selected with puromycin (2 µg/ml) for 48 h. B2R expression was detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting. All lentiviruses were obtained from Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd. Cell experiments were finished within three months of cell construction.
RNA isolation and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using a Total RNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Takara Bio, Inc.). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using a Bio-Rad CFX96 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) system with SYBR Green (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) in triplicate. Each sample was normalized to the control gene GAPDH. The primer sequences for PCR are presented as follows: humanBDKRB2 forward, 5′-CCGAAAGAAGTCTTGGGAGGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTGGCGTTCCACGGAGATG-3′; humanGAPDH forward, 5′-GACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTAAAAGCAGCCCTGGTGAC-3′. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 3 min, then 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 30 sec.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics). Concentrations of the proteins extracted from cell lines were determined using the Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 (BioFroxx; neoFroxx GmbH) staining method. Equal amounts of cell lysate (30 µg) were resolved by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The blots were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumen (BSA) at room temperature for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing three times, appropriate secondary antibodies were added, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were as follows: p-STAT3 (dilution 1:2,000; product no. 9145T) and STAT3 (dilution 1:2,000; product no. 4904T; both from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), MMP2 (dilution 1:1,000; product code ab92536; Abcam), MMP9 (dilution 1:600; cat. no. 10375-2-AP; ProteinTech Group, Inc.), caspase-9 (dilution 1:1,000; product no. 9504T) and cleaved caspase-9 (dilution 1:1,000; product no. 9509T; both from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), BDKRB2 (dilution 1:500; product code ab134118; Abcam), GAPDH (dilution 1:2,000, cat. no. AC001; ABclonal Technology), and α-tubulin (dilution 1:2,000; cat. no. A41641; Antgene). The proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The statistical data on protein levels in western blots were analyzed using ImageJ 1.8.0 software (National Institutes of Health).
Plate colony formation assay
Cells were digested and diluted with DMEM. For each group, 800 cells in 2 ml DMEM were seeded in six-well culture plates and then maintained in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Various concentrations of BK (1, 2.5 and 5 µM) and the bradykininB2 receptor antagonist HOE140 (Tocris Bioscience) (1, 5 and 10 µM) were added. Constructed cells were treated with 2.5 µM BK. The culture plates were collected 12 days later, and the clones were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min at room temperature for visualization. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Migration assays
Using a 24-well Transwell plate containing PET membranes with 8-µm pores (Corning Inc.), CC cells were added into the upper chambers with non-coated membranes. Approximately 1×104 cells in 100 µl of serum-free DMEM were placed in the upper chamber, and 500 µl of the same medium containing BK (5 µM; Tocris Bioscience) was placed in the lower chamber. For cells transduced with lentiviruses, 500 µl medium supplemented with 20% FBS and 2.5 µM BK was placed into the lower chambers. After 24 h at 37°C, the cells that migrated into the underside of the membrane were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 20 min, and washed with PBS. At least six random fields were assessed under an Olympus IX73 microscope (Olympus Corp.) (×10, magnification). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Invasion assay
The procedure for the invasion assay was similar to the migration assay described above, except that the upper chambers were coated with Matrigel (10 mg/ml; Corning Incorporated) diluted five times in serum-free DMEM. Briefly, the cells were placed in the upper chamber, and medium containing BK (5 µM) or 20% FBS with 2.5 µM BK was placed into the lower chambers. After 36 h at 37°C, the cells were fixed, stained, washed, and counted. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Scratch assay
Cells were added to six-well plates and then cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Once the cell density reached 80%, a vertical wound was produced in the monolayer and BK (5 µM) or HOE140 (10 µM) were added. Constructed cells were treated with 2.5 µM BK. The closure of the wound was monitored at 0, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h and measured using ImageJ 1.8.0 software (National Institutes of Health). For each experiment, at least three scratched fields were recorded, and all scratch assays were performed in triplicate (×10, magnification).
Statistical analysis
The data are reported as the means ± standard error. Statistical evaluation between groups was conducted with the Student's t-test. Comparisons of more than two groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
Results
BK enhances the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells
To assess the potential role of BK in CC, colony formation, Transwell, and cell wound-healing assays were conducted. Plate colony formation assays were used to assess the proliferative activity of cells (14). In this assay, SiHa and HeLa cells were treated with 1, 2.5 or 5 µM BK or 1, 5, or 10 µM HOE140, respectively. As revealed in Fig. 1A, BK treatment resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cell proliferation, whereas HOE140 had the opposite effect, inhibiting cell proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner as compared with the control cells. Transwell assays revealed that BK enhanced the migration and invasion of human CC cells (Fig. 1B and C). In addition, cell wound-healing assays also revealed that BK promoted CC cell migration and that HOE140 blocked CC cell migration (Fig. 1D and E). These data indicated that BK promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in CC cells.
Figure 1.
BK enhances the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells. (A) Proliferation activity as detected by colony formation in SiHa and HeLa cells treated with different concentrations of BK or HOE140. (B and C) Transwell assays were used to assess cell migration and invasion in terms of cell numbers. (D and E) Representative images and quantification of the wound closure capacities of SiHa and HeLa cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01. BK, bradykinin; CC, cervical cancer.
Involvement of B2R in BK-mediated proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells
To further determine whether B2R is involved in the BK-mediated biological function of CC cell lines, B2R-overexpressed and -knockdown cell lines were constructed. After confirming mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2A), plate cell colony formation assays were conducted. Fig. 2B revealed that B2R overexpression significantly increased cell proliferation and that B2R knockdown markedly reduced cell proliferation. Transwell assays revealed that B2R-overexpressed CC cells exhibited greater migration and invasion abilities compared to those of the control cells, while in B2R-knockdown CC cells, the effect was reversed (Fig. 2C and D). The results of the scratch assays were similar to those of the Transwell assays (Fig. 2E and F). During the incubation period, 2.5 µM BK was added to all cell supernatants. Collectively, these data indicated that BK promoted CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via B2R.
Figure 2.
Overexpression or knockdown of B2R enhances or inhibits, respectively, the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells. (A) SiHa and HeLa cells were transfected with oe-B2R, sh-B2R, or an empty lentiviral vector and analyzed with western blotting and RT-qPCR. (B) Plate colony formation assays were used to assess the proliferation activity of the established cells. (C and D) Transwell assays were used to assess cell migration and invasion by cell numbers. (E and F) Representative images and quantification of the wound closure capacities of the established cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01. B2R, bradykinin B2 receptor; CC, cervical cancer.
BK upregulates MMP expression in CC cells
Whether MMPs are involved in BK-induced invasion and migration of CC cells was also investigated. Notably, treatment with BK resulted in a concentration-dependent upregulation of MMP2 and MMP9 in SiHa and HeLa cells (Fig. 3A and B). However, MMP2 and MMP9 expression was inhibited by HOE140 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A and 3B). Moreover, there was a positive association between B2R expression and MMP2 and MMP9 expression (Fig. 4A and B). Thus, BK/B2R mediated migration and invasion of CC cells by increasing the expression of MMP2 and MMP9.
Figure 3.
Representative blots revealing the protein levels of p-STAT3, STAT3, MMP2, MMP9, cleaved caspase-9, and caspase-9 in (A) SiHa and (B) HeLa cells treated with BK or HOE140 at different concentrations. GAPDH was loaded as a control. The results were similar for three independent experiments. p-STAT3, phosphorylated-STAT3; BK, bradykinin; MMP, matrix metalloprotease.
Figure 4.
Representative blots revealing the protein levels of p-STAT3, STAT3, MMP2, MMP9, cleaved caspase-9, and caspase-9 in (A) SiHa and (B) HeLa cells transfected with oe-B2R, sh-B2R, or an empty lentiviral vector. GAPDH was loaded as a control. The results were similar for three independent experiments. p-STAT3, phosphorylated-STAT3; B2R, bradykinin B2 receptor; MMP, matrix metalloprotease.
BK enhances the activation of STAT3 signaling pathways to promote CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion
Given that abnormal activation of STAT3 signaling plays an important role in CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (23,24), whether STAT3 signaling pathways are involved in the BK-mediated biological function of CC cells was investigated. Western blotting indicated that phosphorylated (p)-STAT3 protein levels were increased after treatment with BK while HOE140 decreased p-STAT3 protein levels in a dose-dependent manner. For the STAT3-regulated pro-apoptotic protein cleaved caspase-9, the effect was reversed (Fig. 3A and B). Similarly, the protein level of p-STAT3 in B2R-overexpressed cells was markedly increased compared with that in the control cells, while B2R-knockdown CC cells exhibit the opposite effect. The expression of B2R also exhibited a positive association with those of MMP2 and MMP9 and a negative association with that of the apoptosis pathway-related protein cleaved caspase-9 (Fig. 4A and B). In summary, the present findings indicated that the activation of B2R and STAT3 played important roles during BK-induced proliferation, migration, and invasion in CC cells.
Discussion
BK, the most prominent member of the kinin group, plays an important role in many cellular processes (25). An increasing number of studies have revealed that BK treatment promotes proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis in many cancers (11,26). The present findings have revealed for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that BK treatment promoted proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells, whereas the B2R inhibitor HOE140 exhibited the opposite effect. Previous research performed by our group determined that BK promoted CC angiogenesis via B2R but not B1R (12). Furthermore, in the present study, overexpression of B2R facilitated BK-treated CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, whereas downregulatoin of B2R blocked them. Collectively, the results of the present study indicated that BK plays a biological role via B2R in CC cells.Several studies have demonstrated that BK promotes tumorigenesis through the MAPK, PKC, NF-κB, and ERK signaling pathways (7,9,11,27). Constitutive STAT3 activation was revealed to be associated with various humancancers and indicated poor prognosis (14,17,28,29). The present study revealed that treatment of CC cells with BK induced an increase in the expression of p-STAT3Tyrosine705 (Y705) in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, the B2R antagonist HOE140 has the opposite effect. Activated STAT3 has been revealed to upregulate MMP expression and reduce the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins (15,22). To the best of our knowledge, the present findings are the first to demonstrate that treatment of CC cells with BK/B2R upregulated p-STAT3 expression while it downregulated the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein cleaved caspase-9, consequently facilitating CC cell migration and invasion by stimulating the activity of MMP2 and MMP9, whereas silencing of B2R blocked these effects. These data confirmed that BK/B2R plays an important role in the malignant progression of CC by activating STAT3.STAT3 plays an important role in tumorigenesis, and many studies have demonstrated that STAT3 inhibitors are promising agents for antitumor therapy (13). However, although small-molecule STAT3 inhibitors exhibit antitumor effects, they also cause serious side effects, some of which are fatal (30,31). The present study revealed that the B2R inhibitor HOE140 hindered the activation of STAT3, thus, it was speculated whether B2R inhibitors can also achieve the same antitumor effect as STAT3 inhibitors, but with reduced side effects. This is a potentially fruitful area of future research and may bring new hope to many cancerpatients.Notably, based on the biological function of BK in tumors, there are several studies that suggest that BK antagonists can be used as novel antitumor drugs (32). In the present study, the B2R antagonist HOE140 was revealed to inhibit the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of CC cells. Moreover, Avdieiev et al reported that the combination of a BK receptor antagonist and thiazolidinone derivatives had a significant synergistic effect on fatality to rat and humanglioma cells and also reduced drug resistance (33). BK antagonists have also been used in human trials and no harmful side effects have been observed. Thus, BK antagonists can be used for anticancer therapy (34). Accordingly, BK antagonists may serve as very promising agents for the treatment of CC. For patients with recurrent CC and/or that are drug resistant, the combination of cisplatin/paclitaxel with Bevacizumab, an antibody directed against VEGF-A, provides a new treatment strategy which can increase the toxicity of drugs to tumor cells (35). For such patients, B2R antagonist treatment may also provide an option worthy of investigation.In summary, it was demonstrated for the first time that BK promoted CC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through activation of the B2 receptor and STAT3 signaling pathways. It was also revealed that BK/B2R facilitated CC cell migration and invasion by upregulating the expression of the STAT3-regulated products MMP2 and MMP9, and that BK/B2R downregulated the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein cleaved caspase-9. These findings will enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of CC tumorigenesis and metastasis, and they may provide an alternative to current CC therapies.
Authors: Sunila Pradeep; Jie Huang; Edna M Mora; Alpa M Nick; Min Soon Cho; Sherry Y Wu; Kyunghee Noh; Chad V Pecot; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Martin A Stein; Stephan Brock; Yunfei Wen; Chiyi Xiong; Kshipra Gharpure; Jean M Hansen; Archana S Nagaraja; Rebecca A Previs; Pablo Vivas-Mejia; Hee Dong Han; Wei Hu; Lingegowda S Mangala; Behrouz Zand; Loren J Stagg; John E Ladbury; Bulent Ozpolat; S Neslihan Alpay; Masato Nishimura; Rebecca L Stone; Koji Matsuo; Guillermo N Armaiz-Peña; Heather J Dalton; Christopher Danes; Blake Goodman; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Carola Kruger; Armin Schneider; Shyon Haghpeykar; Padmavathi Jaladurgam; Mien-Chie Hung; Robert L Coleman; Jinsong Liu; Chun Li; Diana Urbauer; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; David B Jackson; Anil K Sood Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Marie Eve Moreau; Nancy Garbacki; Giuseppe Molinaro; Nancy J Brown; François Marceau; Albert Adam Journal: J Pharmacol Sci Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Teppei Morikawa; Yoshifumi Baba; Mai Yamauchi; Aya Kuchiba; Katsuhiko Nosho; Kaori Shima; Noriko Tanaka; Curtis Huttenhower; David A Frank; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John M Stewart; Lajos Gera; Daniel C Chan; Paul A Bunn; Eunice J York; Vitalija Simkeviciene; Barbara Helfrich Journal: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Anne Cuypers; Anh-Co Khanh Truong; Lisa M Becker; Paula Saavedra-García; Peter Carmeliet Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 5.738