Colin A Ellis1, Samuel F Berkovic2,3, Michael P Epstein4, Ruth Ottman5,6. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Epilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne (Austin Health), Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. 3. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 5. Departments of Epidemiology and Neurology, and the G. H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, NY. 6. Division of Translational Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have observed that epilepsy risk is higher among offspring of affected women than offspring of affected men. We tested whether this "maternal effect" was present in familial epilepsies, which are enriched for genetic factors that contribute to epilepsy risk. METHODS: We assessed evidence of a maternal effect in a cohort of families containing ≥3 persons with epilepsy using 3 methods: (1) "downward-looking" analysis, comparing the rate of epilepsy in offspring of affected women versus men; (2) "upward-looking" analysis, comparing the rate of epilepsy among mothers versus fathers of affected individuals; and (3) lineage analysis, comparing the proportion of affected individuals with family history of epilepsy on the maternal versus paternal side. RESULTS: Downward-looking analysis revealed no difference in epilepsy rates among offspring of affected mothers versus fathers (prevalence ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-1.2). Upward-looking analysis revealed more affected mothers than affected fathers; this effect was similar for affected and unaffected sibships (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.2) and was explained by a combination of differential fertility and participation rates. Lineage analysis revealed no significant difference in the likelihood of maternal versus paternal family history of epilepsy. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence of a maternal effect on epilepsy risk in this familial epilepsy cohort. Confounding sex imbalances can create the appearance of a maternal effect in upward-looking analyses and may have impacted prior studies. We discuss possible explanations for the lack of evidence, in familial epilepsies, of the maternal effect observed in population-based studies. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:132-138.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have observed that epilepsy risk is higher among offspring of affected women than offspring of affected men. We tested whether this "maternal effect" was present in familial epilepsies, which are enriched for genetic factors that contribute to epilepsy risk. METHODS: We assessed evidence of a maternal effect in a cohort of families containing ≥3 persons with epilepsy using 3 methods: (1) "downward-looking" analysis, comparing the rate of epilepsy in offspring of affected women versus men; (2) "upward-looking" analysis, comparing the rate of epilepsy among mothers versus fathers of affected individuals; and (3) lineage analysis, comparing the proportion of affected individuals with family history of epilepsy on the maternal versus paternal side. RESULTS: Downward-looking analysis revealed no difference in epilepsy rates among offspring of affected mothers versus fathers (prevalence ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-1.2). Upward-looking analysis revealed more affected mothers than affected fathers; this effect was similar for affected and unaffected sibships (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.2) and was explained by a combination of differential fertility and participation rates. Lineage analysis revealed no significant difference in the likelihood of maternal versus paternal family history of epilepsy. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence of a maternal effect on epilepsy risk in this familial epilepsy cohort. Confounding sex imbalances can create the appearance of a maternal effect in upward-looking analyses and may have impacted prior studies. We discuss possible explanations for the lack of evidence, in familial epilepsies, of the maternal effect observed in population-based studies. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:132-138.
Authors: Deb K Pal; Martina Durner; Irene Klotz; Elisa Dicker; Shlomo Shinnar; Stanley Resor; Jeffrey Cohen; Cynthia Harden; Solomon L Moshé; Karen Ballaban-Gill; Edward B Bromfield; David A Greenberg Journal: Brain Dev Date: 2006-01-18 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Colin A Ellis; Leonid Churilov; Michael P Epstein; Sharon X Xie; Susannah T Bellows; Ruth Ottman; Samuel F Berkovic Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Anna L Peljto; Christie Barker-Cummings; Vincent M Vasoli; Cynthia L Leibson; W Allen Hauser; Jeffrey R Buchhalter; Ruth Ottman Journal: Brain Date: 2014-01-26 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Julie W Dreier; Colin A Ellis; Samuel F Berkovic; Chris Cotsapas; Ruth Ottman; Jakob Christensen Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2020-11-29 Impact factor: 4.511