Julie H Ishida1, Alysandra J Zhang2, Stacey Steigerwald2, Beth E Cohen2,3, Marzieh Vali2, Salomeh Keyhani4,5. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, UCSF, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA. salomeh.keyhani@ucsf.edu. 5. Department of Medicine, UCSF, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. salomeh.keyhani@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Marijuana is currently legal for recreational use in 10 states and Washington DC while a total of 34 states have implemented varying degrees of medical marijuana. The commercialization of marijuana has been accompanied by a proliferation of false claims regarding the therapeutic potential of marijuana, which are popularized by several different information sources. To date, no study has examined where US adults get their information regarding marijuana. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sources of information associated with believing unsupported claims about marijuana. DESIGN: Probability-based online survey PARTICIPANTS: 16,820 adults, with a response rate of about 55% (N = 9003) MAIN MEASURES: Most influential sources of information about marijuana and belief of statements consistent with misinformation, for example, smoking marijuana has preventative health benefits, secondhand marijuana smoke or use during pregnancy is completely or somewhat safe, and marijuana is not at all addictive. KEY RESULTS: There were 9003 respondents (response rate 55%). Forty-three percent believed unsupported claims about marijuana. The most influential sources of information were health professionals, traditional media, friends/relatives, and social media/internet. Individuals reporting social media or the Internet (1.46 CI [1.30, 1.64]), the marijuana industry (e.g., advertisements, dispensaries) (2.88 CI [2.15, 3.88]), and friends or relatives (1.41 CI[1.26, 1.58]) as the most influential source of information about marijuana were more likely to believe any statement consistent with misinformation about marijuana in comparison with those who reported other sources as most influential. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals reporting the most significant source of information regarding marijuana was from social media or the Internet, the marijuana industry, or friends or relatives were more likely to believe unsupported claims about marijuana. Public health campaigns to counter the misinformation about marijuana to the public are needed.
BACKGROUND:Marijuana is currently legal for recreational use in 10 states and Washington DC while a total of 34 states have implemented varying degrees of medical marijuana. The commercialization of marijuana has been accompanied by a proliferation of false claims regarding the therapeutic potential of marijuana, which are popularized by several different information sources. To date, no study has examined where US adults get their information regarding marijuana. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sources of information associated with believing unsupported claims about marijuana. DESIGN: Probability-based online survey PARTICIPANTS: 16,820 adults, with a response rate of about 55% (N = 9003) MAIN MEASURES: Most influential sources of information about marijuana and belief of statements consistent with misinformation, for example, smoking marijuana has preventative health benefits, secondhand marijuana smoke or use during pregnancy is completely or somewhat safe, and marijuana is not at all addictive. KEY RESULTS: There were 9003 respondents (response rate 55%). Forty-three percent believed unsupported claims about marijuana. The most influential sources of information were health professionals, traditional media, friends/relatives, and social media/internet. Individuals reporting social media or the Internet (1.46 CI [1.30, 1.64]), the marijuana industry (e.g., advertisements, dispensaries) (2.88 CI [2.15, 3.88]), and friends or relatives (1.41 CI[1.26, 1.58]) as the most influential source of information about marijuana were more likely to believe any statement consistent with misinformation about marijuana in comparison with those who reported other sources as most influential. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals reporting the most significant source of information regarding marijuana was from social media or the Internet, the marijuana industry, or friends or relatives were more likely to believe unsupported claims about marijuana. Public health campaigns to counter the misinformation about marijuana to the public are needed.
Authors: C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Daniel Krewski; Michael Jerrett; Yuanli Shi; Eugenia E Calle; Michael J Thun Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jiani Yu; Rebekah H Nagler; Erika Franklin Fowler; Karla Kerlikowske; Sarah E Gollust Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Wilson M Compton; Beth Han; Christopher M Jones; Carlos Blanco; Arthur Hughes Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Roger D Peng; Howard H Chang; Michelle L Bell; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eldon Spackman; Rebecca Haines-Saah; Vishva M Danthurebandara; Laura E Dowsett; Tom Noseworthy; Fiona M Clement Journal: Healthc Policy Date: 2017-08
Authors: Liam Cresswell; Lisette Espin-Noboa; Malia S Q Murphy; Serine Ramlawi; Mark C Walker; Márton Karsai; Daniel J Corsi Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-03-29
Authors: P A Newcomb; M Ton; R C Malen; J L Heffner; J Labadie; A I Phipps; A N Burnett-Hartman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 2.532