Brittney Hacken1, Cayce Onks1,2, Donald Flemming3, Timothy Mosher3, Matthew Silvis1,2, Kevin Black1, Dan Stuck4, Aman Dhawan1. 1. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Hershey Bears, Hershey Entertainment and Resort Company, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The literature demonstrates a high prevalence of asymptomatic knee and hip findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in athletes. Baseball pitchers are shown to have a high prevalence of asymptomatic shoulder MRI findings, but the incidence of asymptomatic shoulder MRI findings has not been systematically evaluated in nonthrowing contact athletes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of shoulder abnormalities in asymptomatic professional and collegiate hockey players. We hypothesized that, similar to overhead throwing athletes, ice hockey players will have a high prevalence of asymptomatic MRI findings, including labral, acromioclavicular (AC), and rotator cuff pathology on MRI. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 25 asymptomatic collegiate and professional hockey players (50 shoulders) with no history of missed games or practice because of shoulder injury, pain, or dysfunction underwent bilateral shoulder noncontrast 3.0-T MRI. MRIs were read blinded by 2 board-certified radiologists at 2 separate time points, 3 months apart, to determine the prevalence of abnormalities of the joint fluid, bone marrow, rotator cuff tendon, biceps tendon, labrum, AC joint, and glenohumeral joint. Interrater and intrareader reliability was determined, and regression analysis was performed to identify the prevalence and relationship to stick-hand dominance. RESULTS: Labral abnormalities were seen in 25% of the shoulders. AC joint abnormalities and rotator cuff findings were noted in 8% and 6% of shoulders, respectively. One shoulder was noted to have a biceps tendon abnormality, and 1 shoulder demonstrated glenohumeral joint chondral findings. Interrater reliability coefficients were 0.619 for labral abnormalities. Intrareader reliability kappa coefficients were 0.493 and 0.718 for both readers, respectively, for labral abnormalities. Regression analysis was performed and revealed that the overall shoulder pathology was more common in the nondominant stick hand (top stick hand) (coefficient -0.731; P = .021). CONCLUSION: Professional and collegiate ice hockey players had an overall prevalence of labral abnormalities in 25% of their shoulders, with findings more often found in the nondominant stick hand. Rotator cuff abnormalities were uncommon in ice hockey players. These findings differ significantly from published reports examining professional baseball players and other overhead sports athletes.
BACKGROUND: The literature demonstrates a high prevalence of asymptomatic knee and hip findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in athletes. Baseball pitchers are shown to have a high prevalence of asymptomatic shoulder MRI findings, but the incidence of asymptomatic shoulder MRI findings has not been systematically evaluated in nonthrowing contact athletes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of shoulder abnormalities in asymptomatic professional and collegiate hockey players. We hypothesized that, similar to overhead throwing athletes, ice hockey players will have a high prevalence of asymptomatic MRI findings, including labral, acromioclavicular (AC), and rotator cuff pathology on MRI. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 25 asymptomatic collegiate and professional hockey players (50 shoulders) with no history of missed games or practice because of shoulder injury, pain, or dysfunction underwent bilateral shoulder noncontrast 3.0-T MRI. MRIs were read blinded by 2 board-certified radiologists at 2 separate time points, 3 months apart, to determine the prevalence of abnormalities of the joint fluid, bone marrow, rotator cuff tendon, biceps tendon, labrum, AC joint, and glenohumeral joint. Interrater and intrareader reliability was determined, and regression analysis was performed to identify the prevalence and relationship to stick-hand dominance. RESULTS: Labral abnormalities were seen in 25% of the shoulders. AC joint abnormalities and rotator cuff findings were noted in 8% and 6% of shoulders, respectively. One shoulder was noted to have a biceps tendon abnormality, and 1 shoulder demonstrated glenohumeral joint chondral findings. Interrater reliability coefficients were 0.619 for labral abnormalities. Intrareader reliability kappa coefficients were 0.493 and 0.718 for both readers, respectively, for labral abnormalities. Regression analysis was performed and revealed that the overall shoulder pathology was more common in the nondominant stick hand (top stick hand) (coefficient -0.731; P = .021). CONCLUSION: Professional and collegiate ice hockey players had an overall prevalence of labral abnormalities in 25% of their shoulders, with findings more often found in the nondominant stick hand. Rotator cuff abnormalities were uncommon in ice hockey players. These findings differ significantly from published reports examining professional baseball players and other overhead sports athletes.
Injuries are common in ice hockey, with a rate of 14.2 per 1000 player-games according to
data from the International Ice Hockey Federation.[20] Face and lower extremity injuries are the most common followed by upper extremity
injuries, with a rate of 3.1 per 1000 player-games. The shoulder has been reported to be
the most common site of injury for the upper extremity in ice hockey.[20]Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most common imaging modality for evaluation of
soft tissue abnormalities of the shoulder.[19] It has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for detection of
labral injuries.[9]Studies examining the incidence of shoulder MRI findings in asymptomatic athletes have
previously focused on overhead throwing athletes. Miniaci and colleagues[11] found a rate of 79% of labral abnormalities in asymptomatic professional baseball
players. Similarly, high rates of asymptomatic shoulder findings have been found in
tennis players, water polo players, and volleyball players.[4-6] MRI evaluation of asymptomatic hip and knee pathology in collegiate and
professional ice hockey athletes has demonstrated a significant incidence of abnormal findings.[13,18] Silvis and colleagues[18] found a 56% rate of labral tears in the hip in asymptomatic collegiate and
professional ice hockey athletes. Because MRI is frequently utilized to evaluate new
shoulder injuries in collegiate and professional hockey players, understanding the
prevalence of asymptomatic findings will help in decision making when evaluating new and
chronic injuries.The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of shoulder abnormalities on MRI
imaging in asymptomatic professional and collegiate ice hockey players. We hypothesized
that, similar to overhead throwing athletes, ice hockey players would have a high
prevalence of asymptomatic findings on MRI, including labral, acromioclavicular (AC),
and rotator cuff pathology.
Methods
Subjects
After institutional review board approval, collegiate hockey players from a
National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III team and professional
hockey players from an American Hockey League/National Hockey League team were
recruited for the study. Fifty shoulders in 25 male collegiate (n = 13) and
professional (n = 12) ice hockey players were examined. To be eligible for the
study, players needed to be >18 years of age and an active member of one of
the abovementioned teams, as well as willing to undergo an MRI of the bilateral
shoulders with no contraindications to MRI. Athletes were excluded from the
study if there was any current or previous known shoulder injury, as determined
by player records and patient self-reporting, that resulted in missed practice
or playing time from athletic participation. Written informed consent was
obtained from all participants.
Clinical Evaluation/Intake Form
Upon study enrollment at the beginning of the 2016-2017 ice hockey season,
players completed an intake questionnaire and had a physical examination of
bilateral shoulders performed by a sports medicine board-certified orthopaedic
surgeon (A.D.) or primary care sports medicine physician (C.O., M.S.). The
physical examination included palpation, range of motion, neurovascular
examination, and strength testing. Provocative examinations of bilateral
shoulders were also completed for all players and the results recorded. This
assessment included anterior apprehension and relocation test and Yergason,
O’Brien, Speed, Neer, Hawkins, and Jobe tests, as well as palpation for pain
over the AC joint and completion of a crossarm adduction.
MRI Evaluation
In addition to the clinical evaluation, the athletes underwent noncontrast MRI
scans of both shoulders at our research MRI facility with the use of 3.0-T
scanners (PRISMA-Fit scanner; Siemens) and a dedicated shoulder phased-array
coil. Table 1
describes the imaging sequences used in the study. After the completion of the
MRIs, the images were blindly reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists
specialized in musculoskeletal radiology with extensive experience in reading
shoulder MRIs (D.F., T.M.). Data from the reviews were recorded on a
standardized form evaluating the following 7 areas for each side: joint fluid,
bone marrow signal, rotator cuff tendon, biceps tendon,
superior/anterior/posterior/inferior labrum, AC joint, and determination of
whether chondral injuries of the glenohumeral joint were present. Three months
later, both radiologists, blinded to their previous readings, reviewed the MRIs
for a second time and recorded their findings on a new standardized form. Thus,
there were 4 interpretations for each MRI.
Table 1
MRI Protocol Used for Imaging Shoulder
Repetition Time, ms
Echo Time, ms
Slice Thickness, mm
Field of View, cm
Echo Train Length
Axial proton-density fat-saturated sequence
4000
9.8
3.0
13
5
Coronal T1-weighted sequence
720
12.0
3.0
13
4
Coronal T2 fat-saturated sequence
3500
55.0
3.0
13
11
Sagittal T2 fat-saturated sequence
5510
65.0
2.5
13
14
MRI Protocol Used for Imaging ShoulderRegarding overall prevalence, a finding at a given shoulder site and side was
considered positive for abnormality if at least 3 of the 4 interpretations (ie,
>50%) were classified as positive; otherwise, a negative finding was
recorded.
Statistical Analysis
For each of the 7 areas noted above as well as for each extremity side,
observations from both readers were combined to form a single binary
(positive/negative for abnormality) summary value for each participant. Counts
and percentages of positive findings at each site and side were computed. We
used R 3.4.1[14] and the psych R package[16] to compute kappa statistics and the associated 95% confidence intervals
for measuring interrater and intrareader reliability at each site. Separate
repeated-measures logistic regression models were developed for each site to
assess the statistical significance of the association between the players'
stick hand and positive finding. However, not all models could be fit because of
the small number or absence of positive findings at certain sites. For this
reason, we also fit an alternating logistic regression model using data from all
sites. SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute) was used to fit all regression
models.
Results
A total of 30 ice hockey players were initially enrolled in the study, of which 5
were excluded because of either incomplete physical examination data or incomplete
MRI imaging. Of the 25 athletes that completed the study, 13 were collegiate ice
hockey players and 12 were professional ice hockey players. Their average age was
22.1 years and ranged from 18 to 28 years. On average, they had played ice hockey
for 16.8 years with a range from 10 to 24 years.
Clinical Evaluation
All athletes had normal physical examination findings for palpation, range of
motion, neurovascular, and strength testing. One athlete had a positive O’Brien
test on his nondominant stick hand, but otherwise all athletes had a normal
provocative testing of the bilateral shoulders.
MRI Findings
A total of 49 MRIs were available to be read by the radiologists (25 right
shoulders, 24 left shoulders). Images for 1 athlete’s left shoulder MRI was
completed, but the images were not saved on the research facility computer
system following completion of the MRI. This examination could not be
interpreted, hence the reason for the total of 49 MRIs on 25 athletes.Labral abnormalities were seen in 12 (25%) of the shoulders. Of these labral
abnormalities, all were read as tears, and 75% were found in the nondominant
(top) stick hand of the players. Two were found to be consistent with superior
labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) tear and 2 were noted to be isolated to the
anterior inferior labrum. The remaining 8 were noted to involve the posterior
labrum. Interrater reliability coefficients were 0.619 for labral abnormalities.
Intrareader reliability kappa coefficients were 0.493 and 0.718 for reader 1 and
reader 2, respectively, for labral abnormalities.AC joint abnormalities were noted in 4 (8%) shoulders. No AC joint separations
were noted. All 4 shoulders with AC joint abnormalities were found to have
varying degrees of arthrosis, with 1 of the 4 shoulders additionally showing
osteolysis/resorption of the distal clavicle. Of these AC joint abnormalities,
75% were noted in the dominant shoulders of athletes.Rotator cuff findings were seen in only 3 (6%) of the shoulders. One abnormality
involved a partial tear of the subscapularis tendon in the nondominant stick
hand of a hockey player. An additional shoulder had intrasubstance signal near
the supraspinatous/infraspinatous junction, again in the nondominant stick hand.
The last abnormality noted was a partial articular tear with intratendinous
extension lesion of the infraspinatus tendon in the dominant stick hand of a
player.One shoulder was noted to have a biceps tendon abnormality. This player had MRI
findings consistent with tendinopathy and subluxation of the biceps tendon out
of the bicipital groove. Of note, this was also the same player found to have a
partial articular-sided tear of the subscapularis tendon.Finally, 1 shoulder was found to have Modified Outerbridge Classification grade
2-3 cartilage changes of the glenohumeral joint. No shoulders were noted to have
joint fluid abnormalities or abnormalities of the bone marrow.We performed regression analysis, which revealed that the overall shoulder
pathology was more common in the nondominant (top) stick hand (coefficient
–0.731; P = .021).
Discussion
Studies have demonstrated a high frequency of incidental shoulder pathology in
baseball pitchers, volleyball players, swimmers, and water polo athletes.[2,5,6,11] Because incidental findings are common, MRIs should be reviewed within the
framework of the patient’s symptoms and clinical picture. Our hypothesis in this
study, that asymptomatic MRI abnormalities in collegiate and professional hockey
players would be similar to that historically seen in overhead athletes, was
refuted. To our surprise, we found overall fewer asymptomatic shoulder MRI
abnormalities in the contact sport of ice hockey as compared with overhead
sports.Labral tears were the most common finding on MRI in asymptomatic ice hockey players.
Previously reported rates have ranged anywhere from 7.5% to 84% of asymptomatic
shoulders showing labral abnormalities.[1,2,17] Our study found the prevalence of incidental labral tears to be 25%.
Interestingly, 8 of 12 labral tears in our study involved the posterior labrum, and
the nondominant stick hand was more commonly involved. This is in contrast to MRI
studies performed on professional ice hockey athletes who had sustained a traumatic
injury to the shoulder with a history of acute subluxation or dislocation, in which
75% of the shoulders had an anterior labral lesion/Bankart lesion on MRI and only
8.4% of patients had isolated posterior labral tears.[3] The higher prevalence of posterior as compared to anterior labral tears in
our study may be explained by repetitive trauma from actions such as checking and
contact with the boards. Another potential cause is repetitive microtrauma from the
flexed, internally rotated position of the nondominant shoulder experienced during
the act of shooting, in contrast to the abduction–external rotation position
associated with throwing.Determining if a labral tear is the source of shoulder pain in a symptomatic athlete
has significant consequences when surgery is being considered. Rangavajjula et al[15] found that in professional ice hockey players, the average return to play
time after arthroscopic treatment for a labral tear was 4.3 months. That is more
than half of the normal professional ice hockey season, with significant short-term
economic implications as well as long-term career implications.Previous studies on asymptomatic athletes have generally reported a much higher
prevalence of incidental findings in the labrum and rotator cuff than that found in
our study on ice hockey athletes. Miniaci et al reported that in asymptomatic
professional baseball pitchers (average age, 20.1 years), labral abnormalities on
MRI were found in 79% of the 28 shoulders studied.[11] In addition, they reported grade 1 changes, defined as a low signal intensity
tendon with an area of intermediate signal either in the substance of the tendon or
extending to the articular or bursal surface, in 79% of throwing shoulders and 86%
of nonthrowing shoulders. These authors noted that such rotator cuff findings are
similar to the data found in an asymptomatic nonathletic population and may
represent normal variants or stem from imaging artifact. Of important difference,
their study was performed with a 1.5-T MRI scanner as compared with the 3.0-T
scanner used in our study.[11]In another study, Miniaci and colleagues[10] noted in 30 shoulders in patients with an average age of 29 years (range,
17-49 years) that no shoulder they examined was normal with homogeneous low signal
intensity throughout the entire tendon. All shoulders had at least grade 1 changes
with intermediate signal intensity in the tendon, and an additional 23% of shoulders
had grade 2 changes indicating a partial-thickness tear. Liou and coauthors[7] found similar results, with nearly all shoulders having intermediate signal
intensity of the supraspinatous junction.Our findings of a much lower incidence of rotator cuff pathology may have multiple
explanations. This may represent the lower prevalence in the ice hockey population
as compared with the throwing population. Another explanation is that with 3-T MRI a
more accurate image is obtained.[12] This may explain why we had fewer findings as compared with the Miniaci et al[11] study performed with a 1.5-T MRI. Finally, our radiologist may not consider
intermediate signal in a tendon to be a partial rotator cuff tear and may instead
contribute this to a normal variant or magic angle if tendon morphology was normal
leading to fewer partial rotator cuff tears being reported.This study has several limitations. It is important to note that this study was
performed at the start of the ice hockey season, and therefore the prevalence of
findings on MRI may differ if the study had been performed in the middle or end of
the hockey season. An area for further research would be to follow these athletes
over time to see if they develop symptoms consistent with their MRI findings.The study was limited to 25 athletes with a total of 49 shoulders. In addition, the
study was limited to players from 2 teams, 1 at the American Hockey League
professional level and the other at the Division III collegiate level. There is also
a possibility that athletes may have underreported their pain and symptoms.
Weightlifting regimens or history of bodybuilding were not recorded, and athletes
also participated in other recreational activities that could have influenced their
shoulder findings. MRI has less sensitivity in detecting labral pathology as
compared with MRI arthrogram.[8] The use of a 3-T magnet may differ from that used by some in practice, and
thus our imaging, and incidence of detected abnormalities, may be different. In
addition, there was no arthroscopic confirmation of the MRI findings, but the lack
of surgical data simulates the decision-making assessment scenario, with just
clinical and MRI findings. Finally, only moderate interrater and intrareader
reliability was achieved in the study, possibly due in part to known normal
variability in the anatomy of the labrum, leading to variation in interpretation of
the images.
Conclusion
Overall, 25% of professional and collegiate ice hockey players had labral
abnormalities in their shoulders, with findings more often seen in their nondominant
stick hand. AC osteoarthritis was the next most common finding in 8% of shoulders.
Finally, there was only a small prevalence of rotator cuff abnormalities found in
hockey players (6%). These findings are in contrast to those of previously published
studies examining professional baseball players and overhead sports athletes. They
suggest that pathologic findings on MRI imaging of a hockey athlete are more likely
to be new as compared with imaging of overhead and throwing athletes. While the
prevalence of asymptomatic abnormal findings in elite hockey athletes is low and the
data helpful in the evaluation of new injuries in hockey athletes, we certainly
recommend continued utilization of MRI in the framework of an athlete’s clinical
examination and symptoms.
Authors: Matthew L Silvis; Timothy J Mosher; Brandon S Smetana; Vernon M Chinchilli; Donald J Flemming; Eric A Walker; Kevin P Black Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Georg Lajtai; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Gernot Aitzetmüller; Christof Pirkl; Christian Gerber; Bernhard Jost Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: George P Pappas; Melissa A Vogelsong; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry E Gold; Marc R Safran Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Ashwin Rangavajjula; Adam Hyatt; Eli Raneses; Jim McCrossin; Steven Cohen; Peter DeLuca Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 2.241
Authors: Maria Klein; Ignazio Tarantino; René Warschkow; Claus Joachim Berger; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Bernhard Jost; Michael Badulescu Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2014-05-01
Authors: Randy Schwartzberg; Bryan L Reuss; Bradd G Burkhart; Matt Butterfield; James Y Wu; Kevin W McLean Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2016-01-05
Authors: Joseph D Cooper; Max N Seiter; Joseph J Ruzbarsky; Ricky Poulton; Grant J Dornan; Eric K Fitzcharles; Charles P Ho; Thomas R Hackett Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-02-11