| Literature DB >> 31636687 |
Yi-Chia Huang1,2,3,4, Chien-Jung Lin2, Shu-Meng Cheng4, Chi-Kuei Lin2, Sunny Jui-Shan Lin1,2,3,5, Yi-Chang Su1,3,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying patients with high risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is often difficult in outpatient clinic settings. This study aimed to explore if the measurement of body constitution can be adopted to predict the risk of CAD diagnosis. The objective of this study is to conduct a prospective observational study and a case-control study to answer the research question. STUDYEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31636687 PMCID: PMC6766256 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8218013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of demographic characteristics between patients with and without coronary artery disease.
| Variable | CAD ( | Non-CAD ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male: | 85 (78.7%) | 26 (74.3%) | NS |
| Age (yr) | 59.96 ± 9.44 | 49.56 ± 15.29 | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.22 ± 3.95 | 25.81 ± 4.88 | NS |
| Comorbidity | |||
| Hypertension ( | 69 (63.9%) | 16 (45.7%) | NS |
| Diabetes ( | 37 (34.3%) | 2 (5.7%) | <0.01 |
| Hyperlipidemia ( | 45 (41.7%) | 11 (31.4%) | NS |
| SBP (mmHg) | 135.28 ± 14.90 | 131.26 ± 20.52 | NS |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.70 ± 9.58 | 79.83 ± 10.16 | NS |
| FPG (mg/dl) | 147.46 ± 62.35 (97) | 116.76 ± 31.45 (29) | <0.01 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 166.11 ± 34.28 (55) | 158.77 ± 24.72 (22) | NS |
| TG (mg/dl) | 136.26 ± 58.07 (57) | 131.91 ± 75.39 (22) | NS |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 109.45 ± 31.44 (58) | 103.33 ± 24.40 (21) | NS |
|
| 35.38 ± 9.65 | 35.74 ± 12.08 | NS |
|
| 34.06 ± 9.98 | 35.83 ± 11.28 | NS |
|
| 29.57 ± 9.08 | 30.83 ± 10.02 | NS |
Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD. Categorical data are presented as number of patients (percentages). P < 0.05 being statistically significant. For FPG, total cholesterol, LDL, and TG, the number of people examined is indicated in parentheses. NS: not significant. BMI: body mass index = weight (kg)/height (m2). CAD: coronary artery disease; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; FPG : fasting plasma glucose; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride.
Multivariate analysis of predicting factors for CAD.
| Variable |
| Wald | Prediction rate: 83.2% odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.07 | 11.52 | 1.08 | 1.03–1.12 | <0.01 |
| Gender | −0.93 | 2.56 | 0.39 | 0.13–1.23 | NS |
| BMI | 0.05 | 0.64 | 1.05 | 0.93–1.18 | NS |
| Hypertension | −0.08 | 0.03 | 0.92 | 0.36–2.39 | NS |
| Diabetes | 2.19 | 6.61 | 8.96 | 1.69–47.67 | 0.01 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.30 | 0.37 | 1.35 | 0.51–3.55 | NS |
|
| 0.11 | 4.46 | 1.11 | 1.01–1.23 | 0.04 |
|
| −0.12 | 5.68 | 0.89 | 0.80–0.98 | 0.02 |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by the “backward” method. P < 0.05 being statistically significant. NS: not significant. CI: confidence interval.
Comparison of demographic characteristics between CAD patients and healthy cases.
| Variable | CAD ( | TWB-HC ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male: | 85 (78.7%) | 391 (82.1%) | NS |
| Age (yr) | 59.96 ± 9.44 | 58.05 ± 8.30 | NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.22 ± 3.95 | 24.69 ± 3.16 | <0.01 |
| Comorbidity | |||
| Hypertension ( | 69 (63.9%) | 106 (22.3%) | <0.01 |
| Diabetes ( | 37 (34.3%) | 79 (16.6%) | <0.01 |
| Hyperlipidemia ( | 45 (41.7%) | 90 (18.9%) | <0.01 |
| | 35.38 ± 9.65 | 25.31 ± 5.69 | <0.01 |
| | 34.06 ± 9.98 | 25.57 ± 5.58 | <0.01 |
| | 29.57 ± 9.08 | 20.45 ± 4.55 | <0.01 |
Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD. Categorical data are presented as the number of patients (percentages). P < 0.05 being statistically significant. NS: not significant. BMI: body mass index = weight (kg)/height (m2). CAD: coronary artery disease; TWB-HC : Taiwan Biobank healthy cases.
Multivariate analysis of predicting factors for CAD.
| Variable |
| Wald | Prediction rate: 82.5% odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.02 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.97–1.05 | NS |
| Gender | −0.37 | 1.67 | 0.68 | 0.38–1.22 | NS |
| BMI | 0.06 | 2.83 | 1.06 | 0.99–1.14 | NS |
| Hypertension | 1.53 | 38.52 | 4.64 | 2.86–7.52 | <0.01 |
| Diabetes | 0.33 | 1.51 | 1.39 | 0.82–2.37 | NS |
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.78 | 9.46 | 2.19 | 1.33–3.61 | <0.01 |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by the“enter” method. P < 0.05 being statistically significant. NS: not significant. CI: confidence interval.
Multivariate analysis of predicting factors (body constitution scores included) for CAD.
| Variable |
| Wald | Prediction rate: 89.0% odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.05 | 6.36 | 1.05 | 1.01–1.09 | 0.01 |
| Gender | 0.61 | 2.50 | 1.84 | 0.86–3.91 | NS |
| BMI | 0.08 | 4.05 | 1.09 | 1.00–1.18 | 0.04 |
| Hypertension | 1.46 | 23.68 | 4.29 | 2.39–7.70 | <0.01 |
| Diabetes | 0.24 | 0.51 | 1.27 | 0.66–2.42 | NS |
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.58 | 3.38 | 1.78 | 0.96–3.29 | NS |
|
| 0.08 | 5.97 | 1.08 | 1.02–1.15 | 0.02 |
|
| 0.15 | 14.22 | 1.16 | 1.08–1.26 | <0.01 |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by “backward” method. Yang-Xu score and Stasis score: variables measured by Body Constitution Questionnaire (BCQ). P < 0.05 being statistically significant. NS: not significant. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 1Receiver operator curves comparing model 1 and model 2 for predicting coronary artery disease. Model 1 (CAD risk factors: age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia): AUC = 0.766. Model 2 (the above CAD risk factors and scores of Yang-Xu and Stasis): AUC = 0.896. AUC: area under the curve.