| Literature DB >> 31636651 |
Haihao Yu1, Xianru Dong1, Dan Yu1, Chunhua Liu1, Shufeng Fan1.
Abstract
When exotic species are introduced into new areas, establishment is a vital step in their invasion process. Therefore, overwintering strategies determine whether an exotic species from low latitudes can successfully invade middle- and high-latitude areas. In this study, we investigated the effects of nutrient and water drawdown on overwintering in an exotic aquatic plant from the tropical zone, Eichhornia crassipes, at the northern margin of its distribution in China. The population density, size of individuals, and the size and nitrogen concentration of overwintering organs (stem base) of E. crassipes that grew in high-nutrition water were greater than those that grew in low-nutrient water before winter. The overwinter survival rate of E. crassipes was significantly affected by the water level and nutrient. The thick and dense floating mat of E. crassipes can increase the temperature of water bodies; therefore, the overwinter survival rate of E. crassipes was higher in constant-water-level and high-nutrient treatment. In contrast, due to the loss of heat preservation provided by the floating mats and the low nitrogen concentration in the stem base, all individuals of E. crassipes died in constant-water-level and low-nutrient treatment. In the water-drawdown treatments, the stem base of E. crassipes was directly exposed to low-temperature air; therefore, the overwinter survival rate of E. crassipes was lower. Our results reveal that eutrophication can not only improve the competitiveness of E. crassipes but can also improve the survival rate of overwintering plants in temperate regions. Our study also suggests that removing nutrients from the water and regulating the water level can limit the invasion of E. crassipes in temperate and subtropical regions.Entities:
Keywords: Eichhornia crassipes; eutrophication; invasion; overwintering; water drawdown
Year: 2019 PMID: 31636651 PMCID: PMC6788430 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Diagram of the experimental design (the number following the “×” indicates the number of replicates. One plant in diagram represents 10).
Figure 2Number (A), biomass (B), stem base biomass (C), stem base length (D), and stem base diameter (E) (mean ± SD) of Eichhornia crassipes under different nutrient treatments before winter. Significant differences among the treatments are indicated by different letters at P < 0.05.
Figure 3N concentration (A), C concentration (B), C/N ratio (C), soluble sugar concentration (D), and starch concentration (E) (mean ± SD) in the stem base of Eichhornia crassipes under different nutrient treatments before winter. Significant differences among the treatments are indicated by different letters at P < 0.05.
Microenvironment temperature in winter. Significant differences among the treatments are indicated by different letters at P < 0.05.
| Treatments | Temperature of air near plants (ºC) | Temperature of water around plants (ºC) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Max. | Min. | Mean | Max. | Min. | |
|
| 6.41c | 16.1 | −2.8 | |||
|
| 8.09b | 14.1 | −1.2 | |||
|
| 6.33d | 17.1 | −4.0 | |||
|
| 8.10a | 11.1 | 5.2 | |||
Effects of nutrient and water level in winter on survival rate and number of surviving plants of Eichhornia crassipes after winter (two-way ANOVA).
| Trait | Nutrients | Water level | Nutrients × water level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| Survival rate | 7.365 | 0.013* | 3.567 | 0.074 | 14.280 | 0.001*** |
| Number of surviving plants | 13.560 | 0.001*** | 7.327 | 0.014* | 15.242 | 0.001*** |
*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001
Figure 4Plant number (A) and survival rate (B) (mean ± SD) of Eichhornia crassipes in different treatments after winter. Significant differences among the treatments are indicated by different letters at P < 0.05.