Literature DB >> 31636201

Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds.

Ignacio Palomo1,2, Yann Dujardin3, Estelle Midler4, Manon Robin5,6, María J Sanz5,7, Unai Pascual5,7,8.   

Abstract

The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries. REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets (20% and 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2030. The model combines the prioritization of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and social equity, accounting for the equitable distribution of international REDD+ funds. Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under alternative fund allocation criteria, especially for scenarios of low carbon emission reduction. Trade-offs increase when distributional equity is considered as an additional criterion, especially under higher equity requirements. The analysis helps to better understand the inherent trade-offs between enhancing distributional equity and meeting environmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  REDD+; biodiversity; climate change; equity; trade-offs

Year:  2019        PMID: 31636201      PMCID: PMC6842634          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1908683116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses.

Authors:  Crow White; Benjamin S Halpern; Carrie V Kappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species.

Authors:  Christopher J Brown; Michael Bode; Oscar Venter; Megan D Barnes; Jennifer McGowan; Claire A Runge; James E M Watson; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Elinor Ostrom
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity.

Authors:  Oscar Venter; William F Laurance; Takuya Iwamura; Kerrie A Wilson; Richard A Fuller; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.

Authors:  Will Steffen; Katherine Richardson; Johan Rockström; Sarah E Cornell; Ingo Fetzer; Elena M Bennett; Reinette Biggs; Stephen R Carpenter; Wim de Vries; Cynthia A de Wit; Carl Folke; Dieter Gerten; Jens Heinke; Georgina M Mace; Linn M Persson; Veerabhadran Ramanathan; Belinda Reyers; Sverker Sörlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Feedbacks between conservation and social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Brian W Miller; Susan C Caplow; Paul W Leslie
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation.

Authors:  Jos Barlow; Gareth D Lennox; Joice Ferreira; Erika Berenguer; Alexander C Lees; Ralph Mac Nally; James R Thomson; Silvio Frosini de Barros Ferraz; Julio Louzada; Victor Hugo Fonseca Oliveira; Luke Parry; Ricardo Ribeiro de Castro Solar; Ima C G Vieira; Luiz E O C Aragão; Rodrigo Anzolin Begotti; Rodrigo F Braga; Thiago Moreira Cardoso; Raimundo Cosme de Oliveira; Carlos M Souza; Nárgila G Moura; Sâmia Serra Nunes; João Victor Siqueira; Renata Pardini; Juliana M Silveira; Fernando Z Vaz-de-Mello; Ruan Carlo Stulpen Veiga; Adriano Venturieri; Toby A Gardner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The extent and predictability of the biodiversity-carbon correlation.

Authors:  Moreno Di Marco; James E M Watson; David J Currie; Hugh P Possingham; Oscar Venter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Progress toward Equitably Managed Protected Areas in Aichi Target 11: A Global Survey.

Authors:  Noelia Zafra-Calvo; Eneko Garmendia; Unai Pascual; Ignacio Palomo; Nicole Gross-Camp; Daniel Brockington; Jose-Antonio Cortes-Vazquez; Brendan Coolsaet; Neil David Burgess
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 8.589

10.  Global warming has increased global economic inequality.

Authors:  Noah S Diffenbaugh; Marshall Burke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fair payments for effective environmental conservation.

Authors:  Lasse Loft; Stefan Gehrig; Carl Salk; Jens Rommel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.