Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice might enhance patient- centeredness and effectiveness of physiotherapy practice. Although patients have a crucial role in using PROMs, little is known about their perspective on its usefulness. Purpose: Explore the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal health problems on using PROMs for quality improvement in primary care physiotherapy practice, and determine what barriers and facilitators patients perceive. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were performed in 21 patients recruited from primary care physiotherapy practice and analyzed using theoretical thematic analysis. Barriers and facilitators on PROMs implementation were categorized into four predefined domains conform. Results: Across all domains, three major themes were identified: 1) Practicality; 2) Interaction with the physiotherapist for decision-making; and 3) Sharing information outside the clinical context. Generally, PROMs were perceived practically applicable instruments with added value to the interaction with the physiotherapist for shared decision-making and for stimulating quality improvement. The perceived barriers were: difficulties in administering PROMs for patients with poor computer skills, suboptimal efficiency when PROMs were administered at the expense of the consultation, the insufficient added value of PROMs for patients with recurrent health problems, and reluctance about sharing aggregated data for accountability purposes. Limitations: The dependence on the participating physiotherapists in patient recruitment might have resulted in selection bias. Conclusion: Patients perceive that using PROMs has an added value in primary care physiotherapy practice. Optimizing implementation using tailored implementation strategies related to the identified barriers in all four domains might further improve the use of PROMs in clinical practice.
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice might enhance patient- centeredness and effectiveness of physiotherapy practice. Although patients have a crucial role in using PROMs, little is known about their perspective on its usefulness. Purpose: Explore the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal health problems on using PROMs for quality improvement in primary care physiotherapy practice, and determine what barriers and facilitators patients perceive. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were performed in 21 patients recruited from primary care physiotherapy practice and analyzed using theoretical thematic analysis. Barriers and facilitators on PROMs implementation were categorized into four predefined domains conform. Results: Across all domains, three major themes were identified: 1) Practicality; 2) Interaction with the physiotherapist for decision-making; and 3) Sharing information outside the clinical context. Generally, PROMs were perceived practically applicable instruments with added value to the interaction with the physiotherapist for shared decision-making and for stimulating quality improvement. The perceived barriers were: difficulties in administering PROMs for patients with poor computer skills, suboptimal efficiency when PROMs were administered at the expense of the consultation, the insufficient added value of PROMs for patients with recurrent health problems, and reluctance about sharing aggregated data for accountability purposes. Limitations: The dependence on the participating physiotherapists in patient recruitment might have resulted in selection bias. Conclusion:Patients perceive that using PROMs has an added value in primary care physiotherapy practice. Optimizing implementation using tailored implementation strategies related to the identified barriers in all four domains might further improve the use of PROMs in clinical practice.
Authors: Léonie Hofstetter; Melanie Häusler; Malin Mühlemann; Luana Nyirö; Daniel Mühlemann; Cesar A Hincapié Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2022-02-11