| Literature DB >> 31635083 |
Doris E Ramírez-Herrera1, Ana Patricia Reyes-Cruzaley2, Giselle Dominguez3, Francisco Paraguay-Delgado4, Antonio Tirado-Guízar5, Georgina Pina-Luis6.
Abstract
In this paper, we report the synthesis, characterization, and application of a new fluorescent nanosensor based on water-soluble CdTe quantum dots (QDs) coated with cysteamine (CA) for the determination of folic acid (FA). CdTe/CA QDs were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, the zeta potential, and Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR), UV-visible, and fluorescence spectroscopy. CdTe QDs coated with mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and glutathione (GSH) were prepared for comparison purposes. The effect of FA on the photoluminescence intensity of the three thiol-capped QDs at pH 8 was studied. Only CdTe/CA QDs showed a notable fluorescence quenching in the presence of FA. Then, a nanosensor based on the fluorescence quenching of the CdTe QDs at pH 8 was explored. Under optimum conditions, the calibration curve showed a linear fluorescence quenching response in a concentration range of FA from 0.16 to 16.4 μM (R2 = 0.9944), with a detection limit of 0.048 μM. A probable mechanism of fluorescence quenching was proposed. The nanosensor showed good selectivity over other possible interferences. This method has been applied for FA quantification in orange beverage samples with excellent results (recoveries from 98.3 to 103.9%). The good selectivity, sensitivity, low cost, and rapidity make CdTe /CA QDs a suitable nanosensor for FA determination.Entities:
Keywords: electron transfer; fluorescence quenching; folic acid nanosensor; positive quantum dots
Year: 2019 PMID: 31635083 PMCID: PMC6832340 DOI: 10.3390/s19204548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Structure of folic acid.
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of quantum dots (QDs)/cysteamine (CA) quenching by folic acid (FA).
Figure 2(A) Absorption and (B) fluorescence emission spectra, (C) high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image from CdTe/CA QDs, and (D) FT-IR spectra of CA hydrochloride (green) and CTe/CA QDs (purple).
Figure 3(A) Stability of CdTe/CA QDs, (B) normalized fluorescence of CdTe/CA QDs at different pH, and (C) variation of CdTe/CA QD zeta potential with pH.
Figure 4Response profile of CdTe QDs with different coating ligands (CA, mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), glutathione (GSH)) toward FA.
Figure 5Fluorescence spectra of CdTe/CA QDs in PBS buffer solution (pH 8). Concentration range of FA = 0.16–16.4 µM. The inset shows the FA calibration curve (average from three repetitions).
Figure 6Results of the competition experiments in PBS buffer (pH = 8). Molar ratio of FA:Interference = 1:20.
Comparison of different fluorescence methods for FA determination.
| Sensor | Linear Range (µM) | Detection Limit (µM) | RSD % | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANTS-anchored Zn-Al-CO3-LDH particles | 1–200 | 0.1 | 2.0 (n = 5) | [ |
| Au NCs /BSA | 0.0075–75 | 0.041 | 1.49 (n = 5) | [ |
| CdTe/TGA QDs | 5–100 | 0.095 | 2.7 (n = 6) | [ |
| ZnS:Cu/ZnS/MPA QDs | 0–100 | 11 | * | [ |
| Formation of pterine-6-carboxilic acid | 0.226–0.566 | 0.0045 | 4.6 (n = 11) | [ |
| Tb3+-1,10 phenanthroline | 0.022–0.226 | 0.007 | 1.2 (n = 7) | [ |
| CuInS2 QDs | 0.2–100 | 0.08 | 3.7 (n = 9) | [ |
| PVA-Trp-CdTe QDs | 0.09–1.19 pM | 1.3 pM | * | [ |
| AuNCs/BSA-AuNCs/Cys | 0.11–2.27 | 0.065 | * | [ |
| CdTe/TGA QDs | 9–272 | 0.19 | 1.59 (n = 6) | [ |
| CdTe/CA QDs | 0.16–16.4 | 0.048 | 1.2 (n = 11) | Present work |
* Not reported.
Determination results of FA in orange drink samples (n = 3).
| Sample | Found (µM) | Added (µM) | Total Found (µM) | Recovery (%) | RSD % (n = 3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.88 | 0.66 | 1.56 | 101.32 | 2.7 |
| 1.66 | 2.64 | 103.82 | 2.8 | ||
| 3.32 | 4.13 | 98.28 | 2.5 | ||
| 6.62 | 7.51 | 100.13 | 3.4 | ||
|
| 2.14 | 0.66 | 2.91 | 103.91 | 3.8 |
| 1.66 | 3.86 | 101.54 | 2.9 | ||
| 3.32 | 5.58 | 102.12 | 3.7 | ||
| 6.62 | 8.61 | 98.32 | 4.1 |