Literature DB >> 31634512

Financial incentives and proactive calling for reducing barriers to tobacco treatment among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: A factorial randomized trial.

Michael J Parks1, Kelly D Hughes2, Paula A Keller3, Randi B Lachter3, John H Kingsbury2, Christina L Nelson2, Jonathan S Slater2.   

Abstract

Improved strategies and scalable interventions to engage low-socioeconomic status (SES) smokers in tobacco treatment are needed. We tested an intervention designed to connect low-SES smokers to treatment services, implemented through Minnesota's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (Sage) in 2017; the trial was designed to last 3 months (July through October). Participants were female smokers who were 250% below the federal poverty level (randomized N = 3723; analyzed N = 3365). Using a factorial design, participants were randomized to six intervention groups consisting of a proactive call (no call vs call) and/or a financial incentive offered for being connected to treatment services ($0 vs $10 vs $20). Simple randomization was conducted using Stata v.13. All individuals received direct mail. Participants and staff were blinded to allocation. The outcome was connection via phone to QUITPLAN Services®, Minnesota's population-based cessation services. Groups that received $10 or $20 incentives had higher odds of treatment engagement compared to the no incentive group [respectively, OR = 1.94; 95% CI (1.19-3.14); OR = 2.18; 95% CI (1.36-3.51)]. Individuals that received proactive calls had higher odds of treatment engagement compared to individuals not called [OR = 1.59; 95% CI (1.11-2.29)]. Economic evaluation revealed that the $10 incentive, no call group had the best cost-benefit ratio compared to the no incentive, no call group. Direct mail with moderate incentives or proactive calling can successfully encourage connections to population-based tobacco treatment services among low-SES smokers. The intervention could be disseminated to similar programs serving low-SES populations. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03760107).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Financial incentives; Low-socioeconomic status female populations; Population-based interventions; Proactive calling; Tobacco control; Tobacco-related disparities

Year:  2019        PMID: 31634512     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  3 in total

1.  Smoking Cessation Programs Are Less Effective in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status Even When Financial Incentives for Quitting Smoking Are Offered-A Community-Randomized Smoking Cessation Trial in Denmark.

Authors:  Charlotta Pisinger; Cecilie Goltermann Toxværd; Mette Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in Comprehensive Smoke-Free Rules among Households with Children: A Pilot Intervention Implemented through a National Cancer Program.

Authors:  Michael J Parks; Michelle C Kegler; John H Kingsbury; Iris W Borowsky
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Effects of active referral combined with a small financial incentive on smoking cessation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Xue Weng; Man Ping Wang; Ho Cheung William Li; Yee Tak Derek Cheung; Ching Yin Lau; Antonio Cho Shing Kwong; Vienna Wai Yin Lai; Sophia Siu Chee Chan; Tai Hing Lam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.