Literature DB >> 31634433

Functional Results and Outcomes After Repair of Partial Proximal Hamstring Avulsions at Midterm Follow-up.

Justin W Arner1, Halle Freiman2, Craig S Mauro3, James P Bradley3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Partial avulsions of the proximal hamstring origin remain a challenging problem with nonoperative treatments frequently providing limited success. The literature is limited regarding the outcomes of operative management in the active and athletic population. HYPOTHESIS: Surgical fixation of proximal hamstring ruptures will have favorable outcomes at midterm follow-up. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A total of 64 patients with partial avulsions of the proximal hamstring origin treated with surgical fixation by a single surgeon were reviewed at a 2-year minimum follow-up. All patients had initially undergone failed nonoperative treatment. Patient-reported outcome scores on the Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Marx Activity Rating Scale, custom LEFS and Marx scales, and total proximal hamstring score were evaluated. Data on patient-perceived strength, return to sport, and satisfaction were also collected.
RESULTS: The cohort included 27 male and 37 female (N = 64) patients with a mean age of 47.3 years (range, 16-65 years), and all were reviewed at a mean 6.5-year (range, 2-12.5 years) follow-up. The average postoperative LEFS was 96% (range, 68%-100%), with the custom LEFS being 90% (range, 39%-100%). The mean Marx score was 12.4 (range, 4-16). The Marx custom score demonstrated no disability with activities of daily living. The mean total proximal hamstring score was 94% (range, 69%-100%). No differences in any outcome measures were seen when comparing acute versus chronic repairs. Three patients underwent further hamstring surgery. No patients reported symptoms of numbness in the operative extremity at rest, while 3 patients had a superficial stitch abscess treated with antibiotics alone. The most commonly reported difficulty was with prolonged sitting. Ninety-seven percent were satisfied with surgery, 92% reported they could participate in strenuous activity, and 97% estimated their strength to be >75%, while 64% estimated it to be 100% of their contralateral side. Patients returned to sport at an average of 11.1 months, and all that returned were satisfied with their performance.
CONCLUSION: Both early and delayed anatomic surgical repair of partial proximal hamstring avulsions leads to successful functional outcomes, a high rate of return to athletic activity, and low complication rates at the 6.5-year follow-up. Nonoperative treatments should first be attempted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hamstring; partial hamstring rupture; proximal hamstring; proximal hamstring repair

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31634433     DOI: 10.1177/0363546519879117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

1.  Outcomes following surgical management of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Hillier-Smith; Bruce Paton
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-05

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used After Proximal Hamstring Repair.

Authors:  Tara Reza; Andrew J Hinkle; Andre Perez-Chaumont; Symone M Brown; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 3.  Evidence-Based Management and Factors Associated With Return to Play After Acute Hamstring Injury in Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel S Rudisill; Michael P Kucharik; Nathan H Varady; Scott D Martin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Predictive Factors Influencing Functional Results After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Avulsion Surgery: A Patient-Reported Outcome Study After 227 Operations From a Single Center.

Authors:  Raymond Best; Anorte Meister; Malin Meier; Jochen Huth; Ulrich Becker
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-29

Review 5.  A systematic review of surgical intervention in the treatment of hamstring tendon ruptures: current evidence on the impact on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Aleksi Jokela; Antti Stenroos; Jussi Kosola; Xavier Valle; Lasse Lempainen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

6.  Open Repair of Complete Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Workers' Compensation Patients.

Authors:  Emma E Johnson; Joseph M Brutico; Lasya Rangavajjula; Yuwei Xia; Ryan W Paul; Peters Otlans; Justin W Arner; Sommer Hammoud; James P Bradley; Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-01

7.  [Clinical results after refixation of proximal hamstring tendon ruptures comparing different anchor systems].

Authors:  M Irger; P Forkel; A B Imhoff; L Willinger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Proximal Hamstring Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ajay Asokan; Ricci Plastow; Justin S Chang; Babar Kayani; Peter Moriarty; Joshua W Thompson; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.