Literature DB >> 31634268

Who Will be the Costliest Patients? Using Recent Claims to Predict Expensive Surgical Episodes.

Karan R Chhabra1,2,3, Ushapoorna Nuliyalu2, Justin B Dimick2,4, Hari Nathan2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgery accounts for almost half of inpatient spending, much of which is concentrated in a subset of high-cost patients. To study the effects of surgeon and hospital characteristics on surgical expenditures, a way to adjust for patient characteristics is essential.
DESIGN: Using 100% Medicare claims data, we identified patients aged 66-99 undergoing elective inpatient surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, colectomy, and total hip/knee replacement) in 2014. We calculated price-standardized Medicare payments for the surgical episode from admission through 30 days after discharge (episode payments). On the basis of predictor variables from 2013, that is, Elixhauser comorbidities, hierarchical condition categories, Medicare's Chronic Conditions Warehouse (CCW), and total spending, we constructed models to predict the costs of surgical episodes in 2014.
RESULTS: All sources of comorbidity data performed well in predicting the costliest cases (Spearman correlation 0.86-0.98). Models on the basis of hierarchical condition categories had slightly superior performance. The costliest quintile of patients as predicted by the model captured 35%-45% of the patients in each procedure's actual costliest quintile. For example, in hip replacement, 44% of the costliest quintile was predicted by the model's costliest quintile.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of surgical spending can be predicted using patient factors on the basis of readily available claims data. By adjusting for patient factors, this will facilitate future research on unwarranted variation in episode payments driven by surgeons, hospitals, or other market forces.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31634268      PMCID: PMC6814263          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Large variations in Medicare payments for surgery highlight savings potential from bundled payment programs.

Authors:  David C Miller; Cathryn Gust; Justin B Dimick; Nancy Birkmeyer; Jonathan Skinner; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Long-term trends in the concentration of Medicare spending.

Authors:  Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The hot spotters: can we lower medical costs by giving the neediest patients better care?

Authors:  Atul Gawande
Journal:  New Yorker       Date:  2011-01

5.  Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; Jose F Figueroa; Nancy Beaulieu; Robert C Wild; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Variation in Medicare Expenditures for Treating Perioperative Complications: The Cost of Rescue.

Authors:  Jason C Pradarelli; Mark A Healy; Nicholas H Osborne; Amir A Ghaferi; Justin B Dimick; Hari Nathan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Predicting hospital costs for first-time coronary artery bypass grafting from preoperative and postoperative variables.

Authors:  P D Mauldin; W S Weintraub; E R Becker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Prices don't drive regional Medicare spending variations.

Authors:  Daniel J Gottlieb; Weiping Zhou; Yunjie Song; Kathryn Gilman Andrews; Jonathan S Skinner; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) is a Novel Cost Assessment Tool for Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Roxane D Staiger; Matteo Cimino; Ammar Javed; Sebastiano Biondo; Constantino Fondevila; Julie Périnel; Ana Carolina Aragão; Guido Torzilli; Christopher Wolfgang; Mustapha Adham; Hugo Pinto-Marques; Philipp Dutkowski; Milo A Puhan; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Variations in Medicare payments for episodes of spine surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Mitchel B Harris; Haiyin Liu; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Low Urologist Density Predicts High-Cost Surgical Treatment of Stone Disease.

Authors:  David B Bayne; Manuel Armas-Phan; Sudarshan Srirangapatanam; Justin Ahn; Timothy T Brown; Marshall Stoller; Thomas L Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.