Literature DB >> 31633993

Evaluation of Osseous Morphology of the Hip Using Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Ryan E Breighner1, Eric A Bogner1, Susan C Lee1, Matthew F Koff1, Hollis G Potter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a common disorder of the hip resulting in groin pain and ultimately osteoarthritis. Radiologic assessment of FAI morphologies, which may present with overlapping radiologic features of hip dysplasia, often requires the use of computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of osseous abnormality, owing to the difficulty of direct visualization of cortical and subchondral bone with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The use of a zero echo time (ZTE) MRI pulse sequence may obviate the need for CT by rendering bone directly from MRI. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to explore the application of ZTE MRI to the assessment of osseous FAI and dysplasia morphologies of the hip. It was hypothesized that angular measurements from ZTE images would show significant agreement with measurements obtained from CT images. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Thirty-eight hips from 23 patients were imaged with ZTE MRI and CT. Clinically relevant angular measurements of hip morphology were made in both modalities and compared to assess agreement. Measurements included coronal and sagittal center-edge angles, femoral neck-shaft angle, acetabular version (at 1-, 2-, and 3-o'clock positions), Tönnis angle, alpha angle, and modified-beta angle. Interrater agreement was assessed for a subset of 10 hips by 2 raters. Intermodal agreement was assessed on the complete cohort and a single rater.
RESULTS: Interrater agreement was demonstrated in both CT and ZTE, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.636 to 0.990 for ZTE and 0.747 to 0.983 for CT, indicating "good" to "excellent" agreement. Intermodal agreement was also shown to be significant, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.618 to 0.904.
CONCLUSION: Significant agreement of angular measurements for hip morphology exists between ZTE MRI and CT imaging. ZTE MRI may be an effective method to quantitatively evaluate osseous hip morphology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FAI; MRI; femoroacetabular impingement; imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31633993     DOI: 10.1177/0363546519878170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  11 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Glenoid Bone Assessment.

Authors:  Ricardo Andrade Fernandes de Mello; Ya-Jun Ma; Aria Ashir; Saeed Jerban; Heinz Hoenecke; Michael Carl; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  CT-like MRI: a qualitative assessment of ZTE sequences for knee osseous abnormalities.

Authors:  Upasana Upadhyay Bharadwaj; Adam Coy; Daria Motamedi; Dong Sun; Gabby B Joseph; Roland Krug; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  MRI-based synthetic CT of the hip: can it be an alternative to conventional CT in the evaluation of osseous morphology?

Authors:  Lieve Morbée; Min Chen; Thomas Van Den Berghe; Eva Schiettecatte; Robert Gosselin; Nele Herregods; Lennart B O Jans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine.

Authors:  Benedikt J Schwaiger; Charlotte Schneider; Sophia Kronthaler; Florian T Gassert; Christof Böhm; Daniela Pfeiffer; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Markus Wurm; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of Osseous Incorporation After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: Correlation of Computed Tomography Parameters With Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Devon E Anderson; Eric A Bogner; Scott R Schiffman; Scott A Rodeo; Jack Wiedrick; Dennis C Crawford
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-31

6.  Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Georg C Feuerriegel; Felix K Kopp; Daniela Pfeiffer; Jonas Pogorzelski; Markus Wurm; Yannik Leonhardt; Christof Boehm; Sophia Kronthaler; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Jan Neumann; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Is Stage 2 idiopathic osteonecrosis of the hip joint associated with version angles on imaging methods?

Authors:  Cüneyd Günay; Abdurrahman Özçelik
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021-11-19

8.  High-Contrast Lumbar Spinal Bone Imaging Using a 3D Slab-Selective UTE Sequence.

Authors:  Amir Masoud Afsahi; Alecio F Lombardi; Zhao Wei; Michael Carl; Jiyo Athertya; Koichi Masuda; Mark Wallace; Roland R Lee; Ya-Jun Ma
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  MRI-based synthetic CT shows equivalence to conventional CT for the morphological assessment of the hip joint.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Frank Zijlstra; Wouter Foppen; Bart C H van der Wal; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp; Max A Viergever; René M Castelein; Harrie Weinans; Marijn van Stralen; Ralph J B Sakkers; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Vasco V Mascarenhas; Edwin H G Oei; Marijn van Stralen; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.