Tuong T Nguyen1, Paul S Soma2, Teresa Mascenik1, Catherine A Lewis1, Rhianna E Lee1,3, Brian D Thorp4, Adam M Zanation4,5, Charles S Ebert4, Brent A Senior4, Scott H Randell1,3, Brandie M Ehrmann2, Adam J Kimple1,4,5. 1. Marsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 5. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Topical mometasone is frequently used as an intranasal spray, on drug-eluting stents, and compounded by specialty pharmacies as a sinus rinse. A typical sinus rinse contains 1.2 mg of mometasone dissolved in 240 mL of buffered saline and is flushed through the sinonasal cavity. The mometasone irrigation rapidly flows to the contralateral sinonasal cavity or the nasopharynx with a contact time on the order of 5 to 10 seconds. However, no information is available on the absorption rate of topical mometasone on the sinonasal surface. METHODS: To determine the absorption characteristics of mometasone, we harvested nasal epithelium from 2 healthy donors and differentiated them into a mature ciliated epithelium on Millicell membranes. We applied mometasone to the apical surface for various time intervals and then rinsed off non-absorbed mometasone with phosphate-buffered saline. Millicell membranes with the adherent epithelial cells were then harvested and stored in guanidine hydrochloride for quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the maximal absorption occurred after an average of 38 minutes after application, and maximal absorption occurred after an average of 114 minutes. CONCLUSION: Our data provide an estimate for rates of absorption of mometasone applied to the sinonasal cavity and suggest that the absorption rates poorly match contact time during saline lavage.
BACKGROUND: Topical mometasone is frequently used as an intranasal spray, on drug-eluting stents, and compounded by specialty pharmacies as a sinus rinse. A typical sinus rinse contains 1.2 mg of mometasone dissolved in 240 mL of buffered saline and is flushed through the sinonasal cavity. The mometasone irrigation rapidly flows to the contralateral sinonasal cavity or the nasopharynx with a contact time on the order of 5 to 10 seconds. However, no information is available on the absorption rate of topical mometasone on the sinonasal surface. METHODS: To determine the absorption characteristics of mometasone, we harvested nasal epithelium from 2 healthy donors and differentiated them into a mature ciliated epithelium on Millicell membranes. We applied mometasone to the apical surface for various time intervals and then rinsed off non-absorbed mometasone with phosphate-buffered saline. Millicell membranes with the adherent epithelial cells were then harvested and stored in guanidine hydrochloride for quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the maximal absorption occurred after an average of 38 minutes after application, and maximal absorption occurred after an average of 114 minutes. CONCLUSION: Our data provide an estimate for rates of absorption of mometasone applied to the sinonasal cavity and suggest that the absorption rates poorly match contact time during saline lavage.
Authors: Lauren J Luk; Toby O Steele; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler; Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Wytske J Fokkens; Valerie J Lund; Joachim Mullol; Claus Bachert; Isam Alobid; Fuad Baroody; Noam Cohen; Anders Cervin; Richard Douglas; Philippe Gevaert; Christos Georgalas; Herman Goossens; Richard Harvey; Peter Hellings; Claire Hopkins; Nick Jones; Guy Joos; Livije Kalogjera; Bob Kern; Marek Kowalski; David Price; Herbert Riechelmann; Rodney Schlosser; Brent Senior; Mike Thomas; Elina Toskala; Richard Voegels; De Yun Wang; Peter John Wormald Journal: Rhinology Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Xuefeng Liu; Ewa Krawczyk; Frank A Suprynowicz; Nancy Palechor-Ceron; Hang Yuan; Aleksandra Dakic; Vera Simic; Yun-Ling Zheng; Praathibha Sripadhan; Chen Chen; Jie Lu; Tung-Wei Hou; Sujata Choudhury; Bhaskar Kallakury; Dean G Tang; Thomas Darling; Rajesh Thangapazham; Olga Timofeeva; Anatoly Dritschilo; Scott H Randell; Christopher Albanese; Seema Agarwal; Richard Schlegel Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Kornkiat Snidvongs; Eleanor Pratt; David Chin; Raymond Sacks; Peter Earls; Richard J Harvey Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Curtis T Rueden; Johannes Schindelin; Mark C Hiner; Barry E DeZonia; Alison E Walter; Ellen T Arena; Kevin W Eliceiri Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 3.169