Literature DB >> 31633644

Early Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Propensity-Matched Multicenter Study.

Georg Osterhoff1,2, Jonas Noser1, Ulrike Held3, Clément M L Werner1, Hans-Christoph Pape1, Michael Dietrich4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare early operative treatment with nonoperative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis regarding mortality and functional outcome.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Two trauma centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty consecutive patients 60 years of age or older with an isolated low-energy fracture of the pelvis and with a follow-up of at least 24 months. In center 1, treatment consisted of a nonoperative attempt and early operative fixation if mobilization was not possible. In center 2, all patients were treated nonoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications. Patients who survived were contacted by phone, and a modified Majeed score was obtained to assess functional outcome at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: At the final follow-up (mean 61 months, SD 24), 105/230 (45.7%) patients had died. One year after the initial hospitalization, 34/148 patients [23%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 17%-31%] of the early operative group and 14/82 patients (17%, 95% CI: 10%-27%) of the nonoperative group had died (P = 0.294). Nonoperative treatment had a protective effect on survival during the first 2 years (hazard ratio of the nonlinear effect: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.38-5.94, P < 0.001). Patients in the early operative treatment group who survived the first 2 years had a better long-term survival. The functional outcome at the end of follow-up as measured by a modified Majeed score was not different between the 2 groups (early operative: 66.1, SD 12.6 vs. nonoperative: 65.7, SD 12.5, P = 0.910).
CONCLUSION: Early operative fixation of patients who cannot be mobilized within 3-5 days was associated with a higher mortality rate and complication rate at 1 year but with a better long-term survival after more than 2 years. Hence, patients with a life expectancy of less than 2 years may not benefit from surgery with regard to survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31633644     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  14 in total

1.  Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Kensuke Hotta; Takaomi Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Indications for surgical fixation of low-energy pelvic ring fractures in elderly: a systematic review.

Authors:  R A Timmer; S M Verhage; P Krijnen; S A G Meylaerts; I B Schipper
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Focusing on individual morphological fracture characteristics of pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients can support clinical decision making.

Authors:  Franziska Saxer; Henrik Eckardt; Michaela Ramser; Dieter Cadosch; Werner Vach; Nathalie Strub
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.070

4.  Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation.

Authors:  Thomas Mendel; Bernhard W Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Felix Goehre; Stefan Schwan; Florian Brakopp; Friederike Klauke
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis - a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Joshua Kelly; Mark Rickman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The incidence of pelvic fractures and related surgery in the Finnish adult population: a nationwide study of 33,469 patients between 1997 and 2014.

Authors:  Pasi P Rinne; Minna K Laitinen; Pekka Kannus; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  The effect of geriatric comanagement (GC) in geriatric trauma patients treated in a level 1 trauma setting: A comparison of data before and after the implementation of a certified geriatric trauma center.

Authors:  Sascha Halvachizadeh; Lea Gröbli; Till Berk; Kai Oliver Jensen; Christian Hierholzer; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Roman Pfeifer; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A computed tomography based survey study investigating the agreement of the therapeutic strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Daniel Wagner; Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Tim Hohmann; Florian Gras; Sven Märdian; Alexander Pflug; Silvan Wittenberg; Christoph Ihle; Notker Blankenburg; Kevin Dallacker-Losensky; Tanja Schröder; Steven C Herath; Hans-Georg Palm; Christoph Josten; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pelvic fractures in severely injured elderly: a double-adjustment propensity score matched analysis from a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Shekhar Gogna; Rifat Latifi; David J Samson; Jonathan Butler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Trans-sacral bar osteosynthesis provides low mortality and high mobility in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Daniel Wagner; Miha Kisilak; Geoffrey Porcheron; Sven Krämer; Isabella Mehling; Alexander Hofmann; Pol M Rommens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.