Literature DB >> 31633625

Biomechanics of two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an infant manikin model.

Jui-Yi Tsou1, Chia-Lung Kao2, Chih-Jan Chang2, Yi-Fang Tu3, Fong-Chin Su4, Chih-Hsien Chi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The loading force applied in infant external chest compression (ECC) has not been determined. The objective of this crossover study was to quantify the actual force involved in two-thumb (TT)-encircling hands and two-finger (TF) methods during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
METHODS: A total of 42 emergency medical professionals performed lone rescuer infant external chest compression (ECC) with TF and TT methods. The order of two methods was arranged randomly, with an interval of 30 min in between. The force was collected by MatScan as primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes, quality of chest compressions, and fatigue level were also recorded by SkillReporter and perceived exertion scale.
RESULTS: Using the TT method, the rescuers performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with higher ECC quality, but more incomplete recoil than they did using the TF method. The mean compression forces delivered in the first and second minutes were 3.53 ± 1.27 kg and 3.22 ± 1.11 kg (P = 0.012) for TF and 4.11 ± 1.80 kg and 4.04 ± 1.83 kg (P = 0.568) for TT, respectively. Pairwise comparison indicates that the compression force delivered through the TF method during the first and second minute of ECC were inferior to that delivered through the TT method. The TF method involved greater perceived exertion than the TT method (5.27 ± 4.69 vs. 4.02 ± 2.31; P = 0.007). The median perceived exertions for the TF and TT methods were 5 and 4, respectively.
CONCLUSION: For infant CPR, the TT method involved greater loading force, lower fatigue, and higher overall ECC quality than the TF method. The optimal compression force is about 3.8-4.3 kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31633625     DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  5 in total

1.  A Comparison between Three Different Techniques Considering Quality Skills, Fatigue and Hand Pain during a Prolonged Infant Resuscitation: A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.

Authors:  Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Martín Barcala-Furelos; Francisco Cano-Noguera; Martín Otero-Agra; Alejandra Alonso-Calvete; Santiago Martínez-Isasi; Silvia Aranda-García; Sergio López-García; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Effect of thoracic stiffness on chest compression performance - A prospective randomized crossover observational manikin study.

Authors:  Chia-Lung Kao; Jui-Yi Tsou; Ming-Yuan Hong; Chih-Jan Chang; Fong-Chin Su; Chih-Hsien Chi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-08

3.  New chest compression method in infant resuscitation: Cross thumb technique.

Authors:  Woochan Jeon; Jungeon Kim; Yura Ko; Jisook Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Analysis of Chest-Compression Depth and Full Recoil in Two Infant Chest-Compression Techniques Performed by a Single Rescuer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Chang; Po-Chen Lin; Yung-Jiun Chien; Chien-Sheng Chen; Meng-Yu Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study.

Authors:  Jui-Yi Tsou; Chia-Lung Kao; Yi-Fang Tu; Ming-Yuan Hong; Fong-Chin Su; Chih-Hsien Chi
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.