Literature DB >> 31632932

Molecular characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from cheese and biocontrol of Shiga toxigenic E. coli with essential oils.

Heba Hussien1, Ayman Elbehiry2,3, Marwa Saad4, Ghada Hadad5, Ihab Moussa6,7, Turki Dawoud6, Ayman Mubarak6, Eman Marzouk3.   

Abstract

The current research was carried out to study the incidence of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in Egyptian cheese (Kariesh and Ras) and molecular characterization of certain E. coli virulence genes (stx1, stx2, eaeA, hlyA and fimH) using multiplex PCR technique. Biocontrol of E. coli with essential oils (clove and thyme oil) was also studied. A total of 150 random samples of Kariesh and Ras cheese (75 each) were collected from various areas in Governorate of Menoufia. According to our results, the frequency of E. coli isolated from Kariesh and Ras cheese was 16% and 5.3%, respectively. Serological identification classified the E. coli strains into two groups, enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) serogroup (O26: H11, O91: H21, O111: H2 and O103: H2). While the enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) serogroup were detected as O125: H21 which is the most prevalent strain. O171: H2, O86 and O119: H6 belonging to enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC). The most prevalent gene detected in E. coli strains was stx1 (87.5%) followed by stx2 (86%), fimH (75%), hlyA (50%) and eaeA (25%) genes. Concerning the antimicrobial activity with essential oils, thyme oil (1%) is considered as the bactericidal effect against E. coli (ATCC35150) with improved the sensory evaluation than clove oil (1%). In conclusion, Kariesh and Ras cheese are extremely tainted with pathogenic E. coli strains, which represent a strong hazard on the human health. ©Copyright: the Author(s), 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocontrol; Cheese; Escherichia coli; Essential oils; Virulence genes

Year:  2019        PMID: 31632932      PMCID: PMC6784595          DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2019.8291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Food Saf        ISSN: 2239-7132


Introduction

Food safety is considered one of the most common urgent matters in the food industry worldwide. Spoilage of the food products with foodborne pathogens receive a special concern among food producers, investigators and customers. Consequently, producing a safe food represents one of the most imperative urgencies in the food processing (Friedman et al., 2002; Mohamed et al., 2013). The outbreaks of foodborne illnesses caused by E. coli have been studied previously in developing countries after ingestion of milk products such as oldstyle cheese which is considered the major source of various types of pathogenic bacteria (Elhadidy and Mohammed, 2013). E. coli is one of the major significant bacteria, which has a bad effect on both human and animal species. Thus, this type of bacteria can deteriorate the milk particularly raw milk and other milk products as a result of poor hygienic measures (Lara et al., 2016; Garbaj et al., 2016). E. coli is classified into six pathotypes: enteroaggregative, enterohemorrhagic/ Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), enteroinvasive, enteropathogenic, enterotoxigenic, and diffuse adherent (Jafari et al., 2012). lethal STEC named EHEC were also detected (Beutin et al., 2007). Previous studies indicated that STEC represents one of the most significant pathotypes which lead to foodborne illnesses compared with other types E. coli (Brett et al., 2003; Kaufmann et al., 2006). In human, the pathogenic effect of STEC nearly due to its ability to produce certain types of cytotoxins for example Shiga toxins (stx1 and stx2), enterohemolysin (hly) and intimin (eae) virulent genes (Slanec et al., 2009 and Assumpção et al., 2015). Among the dairy products, cheese is considered one of the most public sources of vital nutrients (e.g. vitamins, minerals and proteins) which represent the main part of healthy food (López-Expósito et al., 2012). In Egypt, Ras cheese is a hard cheese prepared from milk of large animals. It needs a prolonged time, 90-95% humidity and about 12°C to be prepared (El-Hofi et al., 2010). Moreover, Kariesh cheese is another prevalent type of cheese which contains a higher protein content with a small amount of fats (Hamad, 2015). Nevertheless, cheese is considered a safe food for human being, sometimes its deterioration by various types of foodborne pathogens may take place. Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) are considered the most common bacteria isolated from cheese. EHEC such as E. coli O157:H7 may also cause high morbidity and mortality rates among young and old people (Kousta et al., 2010). Essential oils (EO) are known to have antibacterial and antioxidant effects (Yousefi et al., 2017). Numerous researches reported that EO have a potent antibacterial effect against different types of pathogens which indicated their ability to protect the foodstuffs (Burt, 2004; Kotzekidou et al., 2008; Yahyazadeh et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2010; Bajpai et al., 2012 and Jeong et al., 2014). Various EO with multiple effects such as antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and carcinopreventive effects have been established previously by Chorianopoulos et al. (2008) and São Pedro et al. (2013). From the previously revealed data, the current research was achieved to isolate and identify the pathogenic E. coli and recognition of its virulence genes (e.g. stx1, stx2, hlyA eaeA and fimH) using multiplex PCR technique as well as studying the ability and effectiveness of essential oils extracted from thyme, clove and laurel plant on isolated pathogenic E. coli in soft cheese.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

One hundred fifty samples including Egyptian Kariesh cheese (n=75) and Ras cheese (n=75) were collected randomly from various markets in certain areas in Menoufia Governorate and preserved in the ice box for culturing process within two hours of collection.

Isolation of E. coli

According to the method described by De Boer and Heuvelink (2000), the isolation of E. coli was carried out. In brief, 25 grams of each specimen were moved to sterile tube comprising 225 mL of tryptiase soya broth (TSB, Oxoid, UK) and then stored at 37°C for 18-24 hours. From the broth of each incubated tube, one loopful was speckled onto the Eosin Methylene Blue agar (EMB, Oxoid, England). After two days of incubation, the probable colonies were sub-cultured and then incubated for another two days at 37°C for further identification.

Serological identification of E. coli

The identified E. coli isolates were serologically typed using slide agglutination test (standard polyvalent and monovalent E. coli antisera) based on the method described by Edwards and Ewing (1972).

Molecular characterization of STEC strains

DNA Extraction

QIAamp kits were used for extraction of DNA from E. coli isolates, according to the technique described previously by Hessain et al. (2015).

Primer sequences used for identification of E. coli virulence genes

The Shiga toxins (stx1 & stx2), intimin (eaeA), hemolysin (hlyA) and D-Mannosespecific adhesion “type 1 fimbriae” (fimH) virulent genes of E. coli were amplified according to the technique recommended by Fagan et al. (1999) using designated primers (Pharmacia Biotech) as shown in Table 1. The amplification of fimH gene was carried out according to Pusz et al. (2014)
Table 1.

Primer sequences used for identification of E. coli virulence genes.

PrimerOligonucleotide sequence (5′ → 3′)Product size (bp)References
stx1 (F)ACACTGGATGATCTCAGTGG614Dhanashree and Mallya (2008)
stx1 (R)CTGAATCCCCCTCCATTATG
stx2 (F)CCATGACAACGGACAGCAGTT779Dhanashree and Mallya (2008)
stx2 (R)CCTGTCAACTGAGCAGCACTTTG
eaeA (F)GTGGCGAATACTGGCGAGACT890Mazaheri et al. (2014)
eaeA (R)CCCCATTCTTTTTCACCGTCG
hylA (F)ACGATGTGGTTTATTCTGGA165Fratamico et al.. (1995)
hylA (R)CTTCACGTGACCATACATAT
fimH (F)TGCAGAACGGATAAGCCGTGG165Chapman et al.(2006)
fimH (R)GCAGTCACCTGCCCTCCGGTA

In vitro susceptibility testing of thyme and clove essential oils on isolated strains of E. coli and ATCC35150

Preparation of bacterial strains

Stock cultures of 16 E. coli strains that obtained from our present study were preserved in nutrient Broth (NB, Oxoid, UK) at 4°C. Microorganism inoculum was fortified in NB at 37°C for 24 h. Peptone Water (Oxoid CM0009) was used to dilute the cell suspension to provide 106 CFU/mL (Celikel and Kavas, 2008). ATTCC 35150 (E. coli O157:H7) strain EDL931 genome (GenBank accession no. AWXM00000000.2) was also used in our study.

Extraction of essential oil

From dry clove and thyme plants, the extraction of active ingredients were achieved based on the method described by (Tandon and Rane, 2008).

Preparation of Kariesh cheese

According to El-Khawas and Hassan (2015), cow’s milk was got from the College of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt in which the percentage of fat’s milk is 4.2% (AOAC, 2000). Milk was pasteurized at 75ºC for 15 seconds, there after cooled to 43ºC then inoculated with 3% (v/v) of yoghurt starter culture. All treatments were incubated at 37ºC, up to curding. The combination was divided into four 8 pars as: (I); Control (no essential oils or bacterial strains are present), salt at 1% was added between cheese layers and the curd was left to whey drain into small cheese molds at 22-25°C and the mixture was then divided into four 4 parts as follow: (I); Control without antimicrobials or biological agent; (II) E. coli strain with CFU at 106/mL; (III) E. coli with thyme oil 0.5%; (IV) E. coli with clove; (V) E. coli with thyme oil 1%; (VI) E. coli with clove oil 1%. Two parts of clove 1% and thyme oils were set for sensory assessment (1% for each oil), Cheeses from various handlings were kept in firmly locked plastic bottles and enclosed with whey at 6±2°C for two weeks.

Cheese samples examination

The cheese specimens were tested after two weeks for sensory evaluation and E. coli counting. All tests were accomplished in three replicates and the mean values were then measured. Sensory evaluation for both control and treated Kariesh cheese specimens was performed based on the method suggested by Clark et al. (2009). The samples were assessed for flavor, body and texture, color and appearance. Ten grams of cheese sample was transferred to 90 mL of diluents containing 2% of sodium citrate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for preparation the cheese homogenate. One mL of main dilution was then moved to 10 mL of diluents to get sequential dilutions (ISO, standard DIS 6887-5, 2010). One mL of the serial dilutions was moved onto two plates of Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (Oxoid, UK) for bacterial counting. Subsequently, the plates were kept at 37oC for 24-48 hours. Distinctive E. coli colonies were calculated and recorded according to APHA (2004). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was carried out to investigate the statistical significance (P≤0.05). Primer sequences used for identification of E. coli virulence genes.

Results and Discussion

Dairy products are liable to be contaminated from different sources during production, contamination and their presence in food lead to be unfit for consumption and constitute a public health hazard (Virpari et al., 2013). In our research, the incidence of E. coli was 16% and 5.33% in examined Kariesh and Ras cheese samples, respectively from (75 examined samples of each). For Kariesh cheese, higher result (74.5%) was obtained by Farhad et al. (2017). For Ras cheese, higher results (28%) was obtained by Virpari et al. (2013) and Farhad et al. (2017). Lower result (11.54%) for kareish cheese was recorded by Farhad et al. (2017). The main factors which affect on the quality and composition may be as a result of the clotted skimmed milk, the process of production, the period needed to complete the whey drain, the superiority of the added salt and the practice of management complete cheese (Aldo et al., 2013). The incidence of E. coli in in our samples may be as a result of deficiency of appropriate hygiene and lack of sterilization of milk utilized for cheese manufacture. In our article we identified the EPEC, ETEC and EHEC serogroups in samples of cheese and the EHEC was considered one of the major predominant serogroup (Table 2). In this study EHEC serogroup were detected as O26: H11, O91: H21, O111: H2 and O103: H2. While ETEC serogroup was detected as O125: H21 which is the most prevalent strain. O171: H2, O86 and O119: H6 belonging to EPEC. Ladan and Reza (2006) indicated that O119 represents one of the dominant EPEC serogroup recovered from cheese.
Table 2.

Serological identification of isolated E. coli from the examined samples.

ProductSerodiagnosisStrain characterization
Kareish cheese3 O125 : H21ETEC
O171 : H2EPEC
O86EPEC
3 O26 : H11EHEC
O91 : H21EHEC
O111 : H2EHEC
O156 : H7EPEC
O103 : H2EHEC
Ras cheeseO119 : H6EPEC
O111 : H2EHEC
O26 : H11EHEC
O91 : H21EHEC
E. coli bacteria contain multiple virulence genes that encourage its establishment and attack of the human cells (Ejrnæs, 2011). There are other virulence genes in E. coli strains such as toxins which is a secretary virulence factors and the most important of these factors is α hemolysin, this factor encoded by hly gene (Bien et al., 2012). The Multiplex PCR was used for the recognition of stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA virulence genes in 16 E. coli isolates. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 1, 14 (87.5%), 11 (86%), 4 (25%), 8 (50%) of isolates contains stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA virulence genes, respectively. Whereas; 12 (75%) of isolates contain fimH (Figure 2). Similar results regarding the prevalence of stx1 producing strains were described previously by Martin and Beutin (2011). Lower incidence of stx1, stx2 was recorded by Virpari et al. (2013). 15 % and 22.50% of E. coli isolates found positive for stx1 and stx2 genes, respectively. Higher incidence was obtained by Elhadidy and Mohammed (2013) who reported that all recovered isolates contain 100% stx1 and stx2 genes whereas eae gene was excited in 21% of E. coli isolates, which is nearly similar to our study (25%). In contrast, Farhad et al. (2017) couldn’t detect any isolate has eae gene. The eae gene is necessary for the attachment of bacterium with epithelial cells (Vu-Khac et al., 2006). The pathogenic effect of STEC is related to the production of stx1 and stx2 genes as verocytotoxins. Elhadidy and Mohammed (2013) stated that stx2 gene is considered one of the furthermost important virulence genes and the majority of hemolytic- uremic disorder in individuals are caused mainly by STEC strains that carry stx2 gene. The eaeA gene is an additional virulence gene for STEC that was important to increase the pathogenicity of STEC. However, the eaeA gene hasn’t been detected in some STEC strains that cause human diseases (Kruger and Lucchesi, 2015). Furthermore, Douellou et al. (2017) showed that the virulence gene profiles of dairy products were similar to human STEC strains.
Table 3.

Incidence of virulence genes of EPEC strains isolated from the examined samples.

No. examined isolatesstx1stx2eaeAhlyAfimH
No.%No.%No.%No.%No.%
161487.511684258501275
Figure 1.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of multiplex PCR of stx1 (614 bp), stx2 (779 bp), eaeA (890 bp) and hlyA (165 bp). Lane M: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker; lane C+: Control positive E. coli for stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA genes; lane C-: negative control; lanes 1, 2, 4 (O26) and 9 (O111): positive E. coli for stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA genes; lanes 6 (O91), 8 (O103) and 10 (O111): positive E. coli for stx1, stx2 and hlyA genes; lanes 3 (O26) and 11 (O119): positive E. coli for stx1 and stx2 genes; lanes 7 (O91): positive E. coli for stx1 and hlyA genes; lanes 12, 13, 14 (O125) and 16 (O171): positive E. coli for stx1 gene; lanes 5 (O86) and 15 (O156): positive E. coli for stx2 gene.

Figure 2.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR of fimH (508 bp). Lane M: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker; lane C+: control positive E. coli for fimH gene; lane C-: control negative; lanes 1, 2, 4 (O26); 6, 7 (O91); 8 (O103); 9, 10 (O111); 11 (O119); 13, 14 (O125) and 15 (O156): positive E. coli for fimH gene. Lanes 3(O26); 5 (O86); 12 (O125) & 16 (O127): negative E. coli for fimH gene.

Serological identification of isolated E. coli from the examined samples. Incidence of virulence genes of EPEC strains isolated from the examined samples. Agarose gel electrophoresis of multiplex PCR of stx1 (614 bp), stx2 (779 bp), eaeA (890 bp) and hlyA (165 bp). Lane M: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker; lane C+: Control positive E. coli for stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA genes; lane C-: negative control; lanes 1, 2, 4 (O26) and 9 (O111): positive E. coli for stx1, stx2, eaeA and hlyA genes; lanes 6 (O91), 8 (O103) and 10 (O111): positive E. coli for stx1, stx2 and hlyA genes; lanes 3 (O26) and 11 (O119): positive E. coli for stx1 and stx2 genes; lanes 7 (O91): positive E. coli for stx1 and hlyA genes; lanes 12, 13, 14 (O125) and 16 (O171): positive E. coli for stx1 gene; lanes 5 (O86) and 15 (O156): positive E. coli for stx2 gene. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR of fimH (508 bp). Lane M: 100 bp ladder as molecular size DNA marker; lane C+: control positive E. coli for fimH gene; lane C-: control negative; lanes 1, 2, 4 (O26); 6, 7 (O91); 8 (O103); 9, 10 (O111); 11 (O119); 13, 14 (O125) and 15 (O156): positive E. coli for fimH gene. Lanes 3(O26); 5 (O86); 12 (O125) & 16 (O127): negative E. coli for fimH gene. Biocontrol of E. coli strains (O26) by thyme and clove essential oils was also investigated in our study. The statistics demonstrated in Tables 4 and 5 indicated that the counts of E. coli (O26) were gradually decreased from zero time 3.0×106 ± 0.2×106, 2.2×105 ± 0.1×105 and 5.7×104 ± 1.0×104 in cheese sample with thyme oil 0.5% with reduction % reach to 92.7% at 1st week and 98.1% while in cheese sample with 1% thyme oil the reduction % reach 99.8% at 1st week and disappear at 2nd week of refrigerated storage. Similar results were described by Al Maqtari et al. (2011) who stated that the Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli strains were highly susceptible to the thyme oil and exhibited an imperative antimicrobial effect.
Table 4.

The effect of different essential oils (0.5%) on E. coli (O26) count (CFU/g) inoculated into Kariesh cheese.

Storage timeStrain onlyThyme oilClove oil
CountR %*CountR %CountR %
Zero time3.0×106± 0.2×106-3.0×106± 0.2×106-3.0×106± 0.2×106-
1st week2.6×106± 0.1×10613.302.2×105± 0.1×10592.707.9×105± 1.2×10573.70
2nd weeks2.4×106± 0.1×10620.005.7×104± 1.0×10498.102.8×105± 0.3×10590.60

R %*= Reduction %

The reduction percentages were in cheese sample with 0.5% clove oil 73.7% and 98.1at 1st and 2nd week with mean value 7.9×105 ± 1.2×105 and 2.8×105 ± 0.3×105, respectively, while in samples with 1% clove oil the reduction % were 92.3 and 98.5 in 1st and 2nd week with mean value 2.3×105 ± 0.1×105 and 4.5×104 ± 0.8×104, respectively. While in control group (cheese with E. coli only) the count of E. coli still high from zero time to 2nd week of refrigerated storage with mean 3.0×106 ± 0.2×106, 2.6×106 ± 0.1×106 and 2.4×106 ± 0.1×106, respectively. These results agree with that reported by Ayah and Saad (2016). According to our results, the antimicrobial activity with essential oils, thyme oil (1%) is considered as the bactericidal effect against E. coli (ATCC35150) with improved the sensory evaluation than clove oil (1%). The usage of higher concentration of in vivo EOs than in vitro may be as a result of the more complex growth environment in foodstuffs, which play an important role in the microbial cells protection from antimicrobial agents (Marija and Nevena, 2009). The bactericidal effect of EOs may due to their ability of cellular wall degradation, cell membrane damage, obliteration of membrane proteins and enhanced permeability of the cell membrane leading to escape the different ions and other contents of the bacterial cell (Nazzaro et al., 2013). Thyme oil is recognized to has antibacterial effect against various microorganisms including E. coli isolated from foodstuffs. Smith-Palmer et al. (2001) and Burt and Reinders (2003) indicated that thyme oil has bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects against E. coli O157: H7. The effect of different essential oils (0.5%) on E. coli (O26) count (CFU/g) inoculated into Kariesh cheese. R %*= Reduction % The effect of different essential oils (1%) on E. coli count (CFU/g) inoculated into kariesh cheese. R %*= Reduction % Sensory evaluation scores of fresh manufactured soft cheese treated with essential oils (1%). S: Spoiled samples. The first impression about food is usually visible, and the most important thing regarding the consumer’s willingness to consume the food is based mainly on its inspection. Frequently if its appearance is unappealing, the consumer doesn’t accept any other characteristics such as flavor and texture (Gambaro et al., 2001). The scores for sensory assessment of fresh kariesh cheese hand-made by different methods are listed in Table 6. At first two weeks of storage, a high flavor score was detected in the thyme oil cheese specimens, whereas a reduced value was detected in clove oil cheese specimens at the 2nd week of refrigerated storage. After adding EOs, no momentous influence on the texture value. The entire value of cheese specimens was significantly (P<0.05) increased at zero day with both thyme and clove oils. A greater sensory value was detected in cheese with thyme oil in the first two weeks of storage compared with the control and clove oil usage, whereas the lowermost score was stated in control samples at the 1st week. Similar results were obtained by Ismail et al. (2006). White cheese treated with essential oils had softer consistency than in the control group; because the existence of EOs in cheese can improve the enzymatic action (Mervat et al., 2010).
Table 6.

Sensory evaluation scores of fresh manufactured soft cheese treated with essential oils (1%).

GroupTraits
Flavor (30)Texture (60)Appearance and color (10)Over all (100)
Fresh cheese (zero time)
    Control2254985
    Clove oil2453986
    Thyme oil2655990
1st week
    Control2252883
    Clove oil2653988
    Thyme oil2855992
2nd week
    ControlSSSS
    Clove oil2550883
    Thyme oil2654888

S: Spoiled samples.

Conclusions

From the above-mentioned results, it can be clarified the public health importance of pathogenic E. coli and its virulence genes that were determined in our study in milk products (Kariesh and Ras cheese) in Egypt, that might be attributed to contamination which might be explained by improper sanitation, lack of health education and lack awareness about efficient control measures. Furthermore, contamination of milk and milk products as a foodborne zoonosis are remained a constant public concern with various implications in Egypt.
Table 5.

The effect of different essential oils (1%) on E. coli count (CFU/g) inoculated into kariesh cheese.

Storage timeStrain onlyThyme oilClove oil
CountR %*CountR %CountR %
Zero time3.0×106± 0.2×106-3.0×106± 0.2×106-3.0×106± 0.2×106-
1 week2.6×106± 0.1×10613.33.6×103± 0.5×10399.82.3×105± 0.1×10592.3
2 weeks2.3×106± 0.1×10620.0ND-4.5×104± 0.8×10498.5

R %*= Reduction %

  28 in total

1.  Type 1 fimbriae in commensal Escherichia coli derived from healthy humans.

Authors:  Paweł Pusz; Ewa Bok; Justyna Mazurek; Michał Stosik; Katarzyna Baldy-Chudzik
Journal:  Acta Biochim Pol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.149

2.  Isolation and characterization of a novel analyte from Bacillus subtilis SC-8 antagonistic to Bacillus cereus.

Authors:  Nam Keun Lee; In-Cheol Yeo; Joung Whan Park; Byung-Sun Kang; Young Tae Hahm
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Disinfectant test against monoculture and mixed-culture biofilms composed of technological, spoilage and pathogenic bacteria: bactericidal effect of essential oil and hydrosol of Satureja thymbra and comparison with standard acid-base sanitizers.

Authors:  N G Chorianopoulos; E D Giaouris; P N Skandamis; S A Haroutounian; G-J E Nychas
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from raw milk cheese in Egypt: prevalence, molecular characterization and survival to stress conditions.

Authors:  M Elhadidy; M A Mohammed
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.858

5.  Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from lettuce samples in tehran, iran.

Authors:  Somayeh Mazaheri; Siavosh Salmanzadeh Ahrabi; Mohammad Mahdi Aslani
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 0.747

6.  Escherichia coli: a brief review of diarrheagenic pathotypes and their role in diarrheal diseases in Iran.

Authors:  A Jafari; M M Aslani; S Bouzari
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2012-09

7.  Serotypes, virulence genes, and PFGE profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with postweaning diarrhoea in Slovakia.

Authors:  Hung Vu Khac; Emil Holoda; Emil Pilipcinec; Miguel Blanco; Jesús E Blanco; Azucena Mora; Ghizlane Dahbi; Cecilia López; Enrique A González; Jorge Blanco
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Filomena Nazzaro; Florinda Fratianni; Laura De Martino; Raffaele Coppola; Vincenzo De Feo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-25

9.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Alouatta spp. Feces to Essential Oils.

Authors:  Valéria Maria Lara; Adriano Bonfim Carregaro; Deise Flores Santurio; Mariangela Facco de Sá; Janio Moraes Santurio; Sydney Hartz Alves
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 in milk and dairy products from Libya: Isolation and molecular identification by partial sequencing of 16S rDNA.

Authors:  Aboubaker M Garbaj; Enas M Awad; Salah M Azwai; Said K Abolghait; Hesham T Naas; Ashraf A Moawad; Fatim T Gammoudi; Ilaria Barbieri; Ibrahim M Eldaghayes
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-11-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from milk samples with regard to virulence factors and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Waleed Younis; Sabry Hassan; Hams M A Mohamed
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-09-17

2.  Critical occurrence of verotoxgenic E.coli and non-typhoidal salmonella in some heat treated dairy products.

Authors:  Fatma Elzhraa; Maha Al-Ashmawy; Mohammed El-Sherbini; Adel Abdelkhalek
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2021-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.