| Literature DB >> 31632504 |
Yiju Xia1, Yu Fang2, Haoxiang Zhang1, Caifei Shen1, Pu Wang1, Wu Yan1, Jingwen Li1, Yin Xu1, Shunzi Shao1, Yafei Zhang1, Xiaona Yu1, Zhihong Peng1, Guiyong Peng1, Wensheng Chen1, Dianchun Fang1.
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an acquired condition in which normal squamous epithelium is replaced with metaplastic columnar epithelium as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. BE is known as a precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Currently, the molecular mechanism underlying epithelial metaplasia in BE patients remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the role of Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) signaling in the initiation of BE-associated metaplasia. Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were used to create a surgical model of bile reflux injury. Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze human and mouse esophageal specimens. Human esophageal squamous epithelial (HET-1A) cells were treated with bile acid and used in transfection experiments. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blot analysis were performed to detect the expression of KLF5, CDX2, MUC2 and villin. Epithelial tissue from both the rat BE model and human BE patients strongly expressed KLF5, CDX2, MUC2, and villin. Bile acid treatment also increased the expression of KLF5, CDX2, MUC2 and villin in esophageal epithelial cells in a time-dependent manner. Moreover, siRNA-mediated knockdown of KLF5 blocked the expression of CDX2, MUC2 and villin, but transfection of a KLF5 expression vector into esophageal epithelial cells promoted their transdifferentiation into columnar-like cells, as demonstrated by increased expression of the intestinal markers CDX2, MUC2 and villin. Thus, in addition to its function as a transcription factor, KLF5 may be linked to an increased risk of BE development. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Barrett's esophagus; KLF5; deoxycholic acid; transdifferentiation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31632504 PMCID: PMC6775683 DOI: 10.7150/jca.30050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Expression of markers in normal, esophagitis and BE esophageal epithelium of human based on IHC
| Marker | Expression in normal epithelium (intensity, n, %) | Expression in esophagitis epithelium (intensity, n, %) | Expression in BE epithelium (intensity, n, %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLF5 | -, 0/20 (0%) | +, 16/59 (27.1%) | ++, 18/21 (85.7%) |
| Cdx2 | -, 0/20 (0%) | +, 18/59 (30.5%) | ++, 10/21 (100%) |
| MUC2 | -, 0/20 (0%) | +, 27/59 (45.8%) | ++, 21/21 (100%) |
| Villin | -, 0/20 (0%) | +, 12/59 (20.3%) | ++, 21/21 (100%) |
Expression of KLF5, CDX2, MUC2, Villin was detected by immunohistochemistry in 59 patients. Substantial nuclear expression of KLF5 staining was observed in 85.7% of cases (18/21) of BE. In contrast, KLF5 expression could not be observed in normal esophageal squamous epithelium (0/20). Weak expression (+1) was observed in the basal layers of squamous epithelium in the esophagitis (16/59, 27.1%). IHC, immunohistochemistry; BE, Barrett's esophagus; ++, strong; +, weak; -, negative. (normal vs esophagitis p=0.01053, normal vs BE p=0.0001118, esophagitis vs BE p=0.0001271).
Figure 1Immunohistochemistry findings in human esophageal samples. Representative immunohistochemisty of (A) KLF5; (B) CDX2; (C) MUC2;(D) Villin in human normal.
Histopathological findings at 6 months after surgery.
| Histopathologic findings | Esophagojejunostomy (n =20) | Esophago-gastrojejunostomy (n = 24) | Control (n = 10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperkeratosis | 10 | 14 | 0 |
| Squamous hyperplasia | 10 | 16 | 0 |
| Esophagitis | 19 | 21 | 0 |
| Ulceration | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Barrett's esophagus | 4 (20%) | 5 (20.9%) | 0 |
BE did not occur in control rats, however, 4 of 20 (20%) rats from duodenoesophageal reflux group and 5 of 24 (20.9%) rats in duodenogastroesophageal reflux group developed columnar metaplasia with goblet cells. No obvious difference was found in the incidence of esophageal disease between duodenoesophageal reflux group and duodenogastroesophageal reflux group.
Figure 2Immunohistochemistry findings in rats' esophageal samples. Epithelium was examined 6 months after performance of oesophagealejejunal anastomosis. Representative immunohistochemistry of (A)Klf5; (B) Cdx2; (C) Muc2; (D) Villin in rat normal, reflux esophagitis and BE tissues.
Figure 3Effects of bile acids on transcriptional activation of KLF5, CDX2, MUC2 and villin in Het-1A cells. Het-1A cells were exposed to 200µM DCA for 2, 4, 8 and 12 hours and the effects on the expression of KLF5, CDX2, MUC2 and villin were examined. (A) expressions at protein level. (B)expressions at mRNA levels. (B) determined by immunofluorescence cytochemistry. Results are expressed as the mean ±SEM of three experiments. * p< 0.05, ** p<0.01.
Figure 4Effects of KLF5 siRNA on expressions of Cdx2, MUC2 and villin induced by DCA in Het-1A cells. After KLF5-siRNA, expressions of Cdx2, MUC2 and villin induced by DCA were examined in the Het-1A cells. (A) expressions at protein level. (B)expressions at mRNA levels. (B) determined by immunofluorescence cytochemistry. Results are expressed as the mean ±SEM of three experiments. *p<0.05** p<0.01.
Figure 5Effects of KLF5 over-expression on expressions of Cdx2, MUC2 and villin induced by DCA in Het-1A cells. After transfected with LV- KLF5, the expressions of the Cdx2, MUC2 and villin induced by DCA were carried out in Het-1A cells. (A) expressions at protein level. (B)expressions at mRNA levels. (B) determined by immunofluorescence cytochemistry. Results are expressed as the mean ±SEM of three experiments. *p<0.05, ** p<0.01.
Expression of KLF5 and intestinal markers in normal, esophagitis and BE of rat esophageal epithelium based on IHC
| Marker | Normal epithelium | Esophagitis epithelium | BE epithelium |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLF5 | -, 0/10 (0%) | +, 12/40 (30.0%) | ++, 7/9 (77.7%) |
| Cdx2 | -, 0/10 (0%) | +, 13/40 (32.5%) | ++, 9/9 (100%) |
| MUC2 | -, 0/10 (0%) | +, 17/40 (42.5%) | ++, 9/9 (100%) |
| villin | -, 0/10 (0%) | +, 7/40 (17.5%) | ++, 9/9 (100%) |
Stepwise increased expressions of KLF5, Cdx2, MUC2 and Villin through normal esophageal squamous epithelium, esophagitis and to BE in our rat model. IHC, immunohistochemistry; BE, Barrett's esophagus; ++, strong; +, weak; -, negative. (normal vs esophagitis p=0.009463, normal vs BE p=0.0004483, esophagitis vs BE p=0.0001591).