| Literature DB >> 31632438 |
Xingyong Chen1,2, Wenjun Zhu1, Yeye Du1, Xue Liu1, Zhaoyu Geng1,2.
Abstract
The yolk cholesterol has been reported to affect egg quality and breeding performance in chickens. However, the genetic parameters and molecular mechanisms regulating yolk cholesterol remain largely unknown. Here, we used the Wenchang chicken, a Chinese indigenous breed with a complete pedigree, as an experimental model, and we examined 24 sire families (24 males and 240 females) and their 362 daughters. First, egg quality and yolk cholesterol content were determined in 40-week-old chickens of two consecutive generations, and the heritability of these parameters was analyzed using the half-sib correlation method. Among first-generation individuals, the egg weight, egg shape index, shell strength, shell thickness, yolk weight, egg white height, Haugh unit, and cholesterol content were 45.36 ± 4.44 g, 0.81 ± 0.12, 3.07 ± 0.92 kg/cm2, 0.340 ± 0.032 mm, 15.57 ± 1.64 g, 3.36 ± 1.15 mm, 58.70 ± 12.33, and 274.3 ± 36.73 mg/egg, respectively. When these indexes were compared to those of the following generation, no statistically significant difference was detected. Although yolk cholesterol content was not associated with egg quality in females, an increase in yolk cholesterol content was correlated with increased yolk weight and albumin height in sire families (p < 0.05). Moreover, the heritability estimates for the yolk cholesterol content were 0.328 and 0.530 in female and sire families, respectively. Therefore, the yolk cholesterol content was more strongly associated with the sire family. Next, chickens with low and high yolk cholesterol contents were selected for follicular membrane collection. Total RNA was extracted from these samples and used as a template for transcriptional sequencing. In total, 375 down- and 578 upregulated genes were identified by comparing the RNA sequencing data of chickens with high and low yolk cholesterol contents. Furthermore, Gene Ontology term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses indicated the involvement of energy metabolism and immune-related pathways in yolk cholesterol deposition. Several genes participating in the regulation of the yolk cholesterol content were located on the sex chromosome Z, among which lipoprotein lipase (LPL) was associated with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling pathway and the Gene Ontology term cellular component. Collectively, our data suggested that the ovarian steroidogenesis pathway and the downregulation of LPL played critical roles in the regulation of yolk cholesterol content.Entities:
Keywords: Wenchang chicken; egg quality; heritability; lipoprotein lipase; yolk cholesterol
Year: 2019 PMID: 31632438 PMCID: PMC6786094 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Primers used for RT-qPCR verification of the RNA-Seq data.
| No. | Gene symbol | Ensembl accession no. | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CCL19 | ENSGALG00000028256 | GAAGCTTTAGGGGGAGCCAATCCTCTAAGACCTCTCCGGG | 57 |
| 2 | OSMR | ENSGALG00000003747 | TAACTAAAGCAGCGGAGTGCTTTCCCGGGGAGGGTTATCA | 55 |
| 3 | ALOX5 | ENSGALG00000005857 | CAAACACACGGGAAACCACCCCACCGTCACATCGTAGGAG | 57 |
| 4 | FABP3 | ENSGALG00000037050 | CCTGGAAGCTGGTGGATACGCCGTGGTCTCATCGAACTCC | 59 |
| 5 | ApoA1 | ENSGALG00000007114 | GGACCGCATTCGGGATATGGACTTGGCGGAGAACTGGTC | 57 |
| 6 | CYP19A | ENSGALG00000013294 | ATGGGGATTGGAAGTGCCTGTCATGAAGAAAGGGCGGACC | 57 |
| 7 | LPL | ENSGALG00000015425 | CCCACTGAAACTTTTTCGCCGCTGTCCAGGAACCAGGTAGC | 57 |
Egg quality among first- and second-generation female individuals and sire families.
| Source | Generation | Egg weight (g) | Egg shape index | Shell strength (kg/cm2) | Shell thickness (mm) | Yolk weight (g) | Egg white height (mm) | Haugh unit | Cholesterol (mg/egg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | 1 | 45.36 ± 4.44 | 0.81 ± 0.12 | 3.07 ± 0.92 | 0.340 ± 0.032 | 15.57 ± 1.64 | 3.36 ± 1.15 | 58.70 ± 12.33 | 274.3 ± 36.73 |
| 2 | 45.16 ± 4.02 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 2.97 ± 0.84 | 0.338 ± 0.031 | 15.57 ± 1.57 | 3.32 ± 0.86 | 58.42 ± 8.90 | 265.2 ± 22.88 | |
| Sire families | 1 | 44.81 ± 2.89 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 3.07 ± 0.51 | 0.337 ± 1.72 | 15.52 ± 0.77 | 3.36 ± 0.26 | 58.86 ± 3.08 | 285.2 ± 128.1 |
| 2 | 43.88 ± 1.87 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 3.83 ± 0.403 | 0.373 ± 0.016 | 13.72 ± 0.61 | 4.68 ± 0.301 | 60.20 ± 3.52 | 282.7 ± 53.5 |
Correlation between the level of cholesterol in egg yolk and egg quality indexes.
| Source | Trait | Egg weight | Yolk weight | Egg shape index | Shell thickness | Shell strength | Egg white height | Haugh unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Cholesterol | 0.573 | 0.978 | 0.412 | 0.152 | 0.432 | 0.155 | 0.142 |
| Egg weight | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.607 | 0.520 | 0.101 | ||
| Yolk weight | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.082 | 0.042 | 0.238 | |||
| Sire families | Cholesterol | 0.375 | <0.001 | 0.118 | <0.001 | 0.387 | <0.001 | 0.341 |
| Egg weight | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.010 | 0.653 | ||
| Yolk weight | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.747 | 0.405 | 0.572 |
Paternal half-sib family structure and heritability estimates.
| Trait | Egg weight (g) | Egg shape index | Shell strength (kg/cm2) | Shell thickness (mm) | Yolk weight (g) | Egg white height (mm) | Haugh unit | Cholesterol (mg/egg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sires | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
|
| 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.27 | 7.27 |
| Progeny | 362 | 362 | 362 | 362 | 362 | 362 | 362 | 362 |
| Heritability | ||||||||
| Females | 0.432 | 0.024 | 0.030 | 0.374 | 0.146 | / | / | 0.328 |
| Sire families | 0.354 | 0.070 | 0.206 | 0.516 | 0.176 | / | / | 0.530 |
K = (N - Σni2/N)/(S - 1), N = total number of progeny, ni = number of progeny for sire i, and S = number of sires.
Figure 1Heatmap analysis of key genes involved in yolk cholesterol deposition. Each row represents a single gene, and each column corresponds to a sequenced sample. The level of expression of each gene is color coded with green and red representing low and high expression levels, respectively.
Figure 2Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis of candidate genes. The scatter plot presents the results of the GO term enrichment analysis for the candidate genes. The y-axis shows the GO terms significantly enriched (p < 0.05), and the x-axis shows the log 10 p values. The size of the bubble corresponding to a specific GO term indicates the number of candidate genes annotated with this term.
Figure 3Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes. The x-axis shows the enrichment score, the size of a bubble indicates the log value of the number of genes enriched in a pathway, and the color shade represents the p value determined using Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 4Protein–protein interaction network analysis of selected differentially expressed genes. Proteins highlighted in red and green were significantly down- and upregulated, respectively, while proteins highlighted in yellow showed no significant difference. In the network, each line represents the strength of the relationship between two proteins. Strong interactions are indicated by high STRING combined scores and wide lines, while weak interactions are indicated by low STRING combined scores and narrow lines.
Figure 5Validation of the RNA-Seq results via real-time quantitative PCR RT-qPCR analyses. (A) Diagram showing the reads per kilobase per million value of each gene in both low (L) and high (H) cholesterol content groups. (B) Diagram showing the expression level quantified by RT-qPCR of the indicated genes in both L and H groups.