| Literature DB >> 31632277 |
Hao Huang1, Meiling Huang1, Wenyi Lv1, Yong Hu1, Ruihua Wang1, Xiufen Zheng1, Yuetang Ma1, Chunmei Chen1, Hongfeng Tang1.
Abstract
Trichophyton rubrum is a common dermatophyte of the skin. The aim of this experiment was to explore the role of nitric oxide (NO) in the inhibition of T. rubrum growth induced by 420-nm intense pulsed light (IPL). This study found that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and NO levels were increased, whereas asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) level, keratinase activity, and fungal viability were decreased after IPL treatment compared with the control condition in vitro. Moreover, micromorphology was damaged by IPL treatment. Fungal viability was increased, and the damage to the fungal structure was reduced after pretreatment with an NOS inhibitor (L-NMMA) compared with IPL treatment alone. Compared with IPL alone, pretreatment with L-NMMA decreased NOS expression and NO level and increased keratinase activity. We found that 420-nm IPL treatment can inhibit the growth of T. rubrum by regulating NO in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: 420-nm intense pulsed light; Trichophyton rubrum; asymmetric dimethylarginine; keratinase; nitric oxide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31632277 PMCID: PMC6785631 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Effect of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor (L-NMMA) on Trichophyton rubrum. (A) The effects of different L-NMMA concentrations. (B) The effect of L-NMMA on T. rubrum activity after intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment. (*P < 0.05 vs. untreated clinical strain; &P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated clinical strain; #P < 0.05 vs. untreated ATCC4438; %P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated ATCC4438; all the control groups were considered 100%).
Figure 2Changes in the intracellular nitric oxide (NO) levels of T. rubrum. (*P < 0.05 vs. untreated clinical strain; &P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated clinical strain; #P < 0.05 vs. untreated ATCC4438; %P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated ATCC4438; all the control groups were considered 100%).
Figure 3NOS expression in T. rubrum. (*P < 0.05 vs. untreated clinical strain; &P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated clinical strain; #P < 0.05 vs. untreated ATCC4438; %P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated ATCC4438; all the control groups were considered 100%).
Figure 4Changes in the asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) expression of T. rubrum. (#P < 0.05 vs. untreated ATCC4438).
Figure 5Effect of 24 h of IPL treatment on fungal keratinase activity. (#P < 0.05 vs. untreated ATCC4438; %P < 0.05 vs. IPL-treated ATCC; all the control groups were considered 100%).
Figure 6Scanning electron micrographs of T. rubrum with IPL treatment alone and L-NMMA pretreatment + IPL treatment for 24 h.