Literature DB >> 31632176

Extensive sampling and thorough taxonomic assessment of Afrotropical Rhyssinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) reveals two new species and demonstrates the limitations of previous sampling efforts.

Tapani Hopkins1, Heikki Roininen2, Simon van Noort3,4, Gavin R Broad5, Kari Kaunisto1, Ilari E Sääksjärvi1.   

Abstract

Tropical forest invertebrates, such as the parasitoid wasp family Ichneumonidae, are poorly known. This work reports some of the first results of an extensive survey implemented in Kibale National Park, Uganda. A total of 456 individuals was caught of the subfamily Rhyssinae Morley, 1913, which in the Afrotropical region was previously known from only 30 specimens. Here, the six species found at the site are described and the Afrotropical Rhyssinae are reviewed. Two new species, Epirhyssa johanna Hopkins, sp. nov. and E. quagga sp. nov., are described and a key, diagnostic characters, and descriptions for all 13 known Afrotropical species are provided, including the first description of the male of Epirhyssa overlaeti Seyrig, 1937. Epirhyssa gavinbroadi Rousse & van Noort, 2014, syn. nov. is proposed to be a synonym of E. uelensis Benoit, 1951. Extensive sampling with Malaise traps gave an unprecedented sample size, and the method is recommended for other poorly known tropical areas. Tapani Hopkins, Heikki Roininen, Simon van Noort, Gavin R. Broad, Kari Kaunisto, Ilari E. Sääksjärvi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ichneumonidae ; Africa; Kibale National Park; Uganda Malaise trapping 2014–2015

Year:  2019        PMID： 31632176      PMCID： PMC6791898          DOI： 10.3897/zookeys.878.37845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN： 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

Like many taxa, the parasitoid wasps of the family are poorly known in the tropics. So much so, that the family was once assumed to be exceptionally species-poor in the equatorial region and to peak in species richness in mid latitudes (Owen and Owen 1974, Janzen and Pond 1975, but see Morrison et al. 1979). More recent extensive sampling has revealed rich ichneumonid faunas in the tropical forests of Costa Rica and Amazonia (Gauld 1991, Gaston and Gauld 1993, Sääksjärvi et al. 2004), and the family appears to be too poorly sampled in the tropics to allow reliable conclusions as to the distribution of its species richness (Quicke 2012). In Sub-Saharan Africa, only 2097 of an estimated 12,100 species have been described (Townes and Townes 1973, Yu et al. 2016, van Noort 2019), and even sites that have been studied remain strongly under-sampled (e.g., van Noort et al. 2000, van Noort 2004, Hopkins et al. 2018). The ichneumonid subfamily is especially poorly known in the Afrotropical region. It was reviewed in 2014 (Rousse and van Noort 2014), resulting in five new species and a total of twelve species for Sub-Saharan Africa. This is very low compared to the currently known (and increasing) 49 Neotropical, 125 Oriental, 23 Australasian, 40 Palaearctic, and 17 Nearctic species (Yu et al. 2016). Insufficient sampling, rather than a genuine scarcity, is presumably the main reason for the low African species count: even after gathering together material from several African and European museums, Rousse and van Noort (2014) were unable to find more than 30 specimens collected from the whole of the Afrotropical region. One possible reason for the lack of rhyssine specimens is that adequately inventorying tropical ichneumonids appears to need long-term, extensive sampling (for reasons summarised in Hopkins et al. 2019b). Such sampling is laborious and has rarely been done in the tropics. Ichneumonids have been extensively sampled by Malaise traps in Costa Rica (e.g., more than 1200 trap months: Gauld 1991, about 190 trap months: Shapiro and Pickering 2000) and in Amazonia (185 trap months: Sääksjärvi et al. 2004, at least 72 additional trap months: Gómez et al. 2017). For Sub-Saharan Africa, we know of only two large-scale sampling programs, one of which returned an unexpectedly low sample size of ichneumonids (231 trap months using traps smaller than the standard size, Hopkins et al. 2018). The results of the second program have not yet been published (258 trap months conducted by SvN in Hantam National Botanical Garden, South Africa). In this and a sister paper, we report the first results of an extensive one-year sampling of Afrotropical ichneumonids in Kibale National Park, Uganda. In the sister paper we report the ecological results for the subfamily , including descriptions of the habitat use and phenology of the species (Hopkins et al. 2019b). Here, we update the taxonomy of the subfamily and describe the new species found at our site, providing a key, diagnostic characters, and updates to descriptions for all known Afrotropical .

Materials and methods

We sampled ichneumonids with 34 Malaise traps for a full year (2014–2015) in Kibale National Park, Uganda. The traps were placed in a wide variety of habitats ranging from primary forest to clear-cut former plantations and farmland, and the total sampling effort was roughly 382 trap months (11662.13 trap days, of which 271.16 trap days were unrepresentative of a normal catch). We describe the sampling in greater detail in Hopkins et al. (2019b) and its associated dataset (Hopkins et al. 2019a). As well as using Malaise traps, we also collected ichneumonids by hand netting. Hand-netted ichneumonids were stored individually in 96% ethanol. We processed the samples at the Zoological Museum of the University of Turku, Finland. We separated the ichneumonoid wasps (families and ) from the Malaise samples, then pinned the subfamily and sorted specimens into species. We did not pin the hand netted rhyssines; instead, we stored these specimens individually in 96% ethanol. The samples are deposited at the Zoological Museum. Layer photographs were taken using a Canon 7 D mark 2 digital camera, attached to an Olympus SZX 16 stereomicroscope. Photographs were captured using the programmes Deep Focus 3.1 and Quick Photo Camera 2.3. Photographs were finally combined with the program Zerene and edited in Photoshop CC. Additional images were acquired at SAMC with a Leica LAS 4.9 imaging system, comprising a Leica Z16 microscope (using either a 2 × or 5 × objective) with a Leica DFC450 Camera and 0.63 × video objective attached. The imaging process, using an automated Z-stepper, was managed using the Leica Application Suite V 4.9 software installed on a desktop computer. Diffused lighting was achieved using a Leica LED5000 HDI dome. All images presented in this paper, as well as supplementary images, are available at www.waspweb.org. Because earlier diagnostic characters (Rousse and van Noort 2014) did not work well with our material, we collected a partly new set of nine diagnostic characters for all Afrotropical species (Fig. 1). We retrieved diagnostic characters for the previously known 30 specimens from Rousse and van Noort (2014) if available, or from the specimens themselves if not.
Figure 1.

Diagnostic characters for the thirteen known Afrotropical rhyssine species. The figure shows the frons median carinae (A converge, B diverge, C absent), frons lateral carinae (A present, B absent), hypostomal flange (D wider than second maxillary palp, E narrower than or comparable to second maxillary palp), subalar prominence (F flanged, G no flange), mesopleuron margin (H flanged, G no flange) and female apical horn (I ellipse, J half-ellipse). Not shown are the epicnemial carina (laterally absent, only just reaches the mesopleuron, reaches high onto the mesopleuron), areolet (present, absent) and tergite 3 structure (mostly striate, mostly punctate, mostly smooth). The images are of http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5766, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2520 (A, F), http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853 (B, D, H, J), http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788 (C, E, I) and http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663 (G). Image F has been flipped horizontally.

Morphological terminology largely follows Gauld (1991) and body measurements follow Rousse and van Noort (2014). We measured body length from the base of the antennae to the tip of the metasoma. If the metasoma was bent, we measured it in several line segments. We measured the slenderness of tergite 1 by dividing the median length by the apical width. The images used to take the measurements are available in the supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). We generated an identification key automatically, based on the nine diagnostic characters (Hopkins et al. 2019c). The diagnostic characters, descriptions, identification key and data for all Ugandan specimens are available in table format in the supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c).

Repositories

Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France (Agnièle Touret-Alby) Natural History Museum, London, UK (Gavin Broad) KwaZulu-Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (John Midgley) Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervueren, Belgium (Stéphane Hanot) Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa (Simon van Noort) Zoological Museum of the University of Turku, Finland (Ilari Sääksjärvi) Diagnostic characters for the thirteen known Afrotropical rhyssine species. The figure shows the frons median carinae (A converge, B diverge, C absent), frons lateral carinae (A present, B absent), hypostomal flange (D wider than second maxillary palp, E narrower than or comparable to second maxillary palp), subalar prominence (F flanged, G no flange), mesopleuron margin (H flanged, G no flange) and female apical horn (I ellipse, J half-ellipse). Not shown are the epicnemial carina (laterally absent, only just reaches the mesopleuron, reaches high onto the mesopleuron), areolet (present, absent) and tergite 3 structure (mostly striate, mostly punctate, mostly smooth). The images are of http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5766, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2520 (A, F), http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853 (B, D, H, J), http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788 (C, E, I) and http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663 (G). Image F has been flipped horizontally.

Results

We caught 448 rhyssines by Malaise sampling and eight by hand netting. They belonged to six species of which two are new. We provide a key to all 13 known Afrotropical species below. We also provide diagnostic characters and descriptions or updates to descriptions for all species. The key, diagnostic characters, and descriptions are also available in table form in the supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). Online identification keys are available on www.waspweb.org. Diagnostic character traits used in the identification key. A Areolet ( holotype) B open areolet (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788) C subalar prominence flange (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2520) D subalar prominence without flange and dorsal margin of mesopleuron with flange (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853) E dorsal margin of mesopleuron without flange (SAMC SAM–HYM–P048018) F elliptical apical horn of metasoma (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5766) G half-elliptical apical horn of metasoma (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853) H frons without carinae (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4920) I frons without lateral carinae (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3234) J striate tergite 3 (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788) K punctate tergite 3 (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663) L hypostomal carina raised into elevated flange (SAMC SAM–HYM–P048018) M hypostomal carina raised into low flange ( holotype) N half-elliptical apical horn of metasoma (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663) O elliptical apical horn of metasoma ( holotype). Image A is from van Noort (2019). Image D has been flipped horizontally.

Taxonomic descriptions

Family Latreille, 1802

Subfamily Diagnosis. The subfamily can be recognised by a combination of the transverse rugae covering much of the mesoscutum; the short, broad mandibles and small, rectangular clypeus; the long ovipositor; and the female 8th metasomal tergite being produced posteriorly as a truncate horn-like projection. Other genera that present a potential confusion risk, such as Merril (), Kriechbaumer, and Kriechbaumer () are not present in the Afrotropical region.

Cresson, 1865 36652094-E3B6-55B9-B3BF-D4189A6283D8 Tosquinet, 1903: 255. Kriechbaumer, 1890: 489. Baltazar, 1961: 75.
Diagnosis.
The genus is easily recognised in the Afrotropical region as the species lack the fore wing areolet (vein 3rs-m is missing), whereas the areolet is closed by vein 3rs-m in Ashmead, the only other rhyssine genus found in the Afrotropical region. can be distinguished from other rhyssine genera by the lack of an areolet (cf. Rohwer, Cameron), the lack of an anterior glymma on tergite 1 (cf. Gravenhorst), the upper tooth being slightly wider than the lower and not subdivided (cf. Baltazar, Baltazar) and the pterostigma being angled where it meets the metacarpus (compared to gradually merging in Baltazar) (Baltazar 1964, Townes 1969, Porter 2001). Old World have fore wing vein 2rs-m only a little proximal to 2m-cu, unlike New World species. The species are rather heterogeneous, with confusion with other genera particularly likely in the Oriental region, and the genus may well prove not to be monophyletic.
Distribution.
Afrotropical region: Central African Republic, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda. Australasian region: Papua New Guinea. Nearctic region: Mexico, U.S.A. Neotropical region: Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad. Oriental region: China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam. Palaearctic region: Russia. Rousse & van Noort, 2014 9B22C444-85EB-5839-BE3C-08D09E62A5CF Figs 3–6
Figures 3–6.

female (holotype, SAM–HYM–P048018). This species was not found in Uganda. 3 Habitus 4 hypostomal flange 5 mesopleuron dorsal margin 6 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 3 is from van Noort (2019).

Material examined.
Type material: CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC: • 1 ♀, holotype; Préfecture Sangha-Mbaéré, Réserve Spéciale de Forêt Dense de Dzanga-Sangha (12.7 km, 326 degrees NW of Bayanga); ; alt. 420 m; 13 May 2001; Simon van Noort leg.; Sweep; CAR01–S158; Lowland rainforest; SAMC SAM–HYM–P048018. Known material: One specimen (1 ♀, see Rousse and van Noort 2014, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of an elevated hypostomal flange, the absence of a raised flange on the dorsal margin of the mesopleuron, an elliptical apical horn of the metasoma, and a finely punctate (over 50% of surface) tergite 3. In practice its colour pattern makes it instantly recognisable. : frons with median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 punctate. Central African Republic. female (holotype, SAM–HYM–P048018). This species was not found in Uganda. 3 Habitus 4 hypostomal flange 5 mesopleuron dorsal margin 6 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 3 is from van Noort (2019). Seyrig, 1937 9EE7D460-6856-5D03-A2FB-1940A7F18BB7 Figs 7–13
Figures 7–13.

female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853), a species found in Uganda. 7 Habitus 8 face and clypeus 9 frons 10 hypostomal flange 11 mesopleuron dorsal margin 12 apical horn of metasoma 13 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (8–13), 1 mm (7).

Type material: DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: • 1 ♀, holotype; Eala []; Nov. 1935; “J. Ghesquière”; “R. Dét. G 3330”; RMCARMCA-ENT-000017927 • 1 ♂, paratype; Bambesa; Dec. 1946; “P.L. Benoit”; RMCARMCA-ENT-000017928. Non-type material: CAMEROON: • 1 ♂; Korup; Dec. 1980–Jan. 1981; Mrs D. Jackson leg.; NHMUK • 1 ♂; Korup; 1981; Mrs D. Jackson leg.; NHMUK. UGANDA: • 1 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site R93, Malaise trap R93T1; (WGS84); alt. 1510 m (GPS, WGS84); 23 Sep. 2014–7 Oct. 2014; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.53 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K30S, Malaise trap K30ST4; (WGS84); alt. 1420 m (GPS, WGS84); 25 Aug. 2015–11 Sep. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1263 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K15, Malaise trap K15T2; (WGS84); alt. 1470 m (GPS, WGS84); 4 May 2015–20 May 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5592 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 15 Dec. 2014–29 Dec. 2014; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5701 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; 24 Feb. 2015–10 Mar. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5737 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; 13 Jan. 2015–27 Jan. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853 • 1 ♂; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site K31, Malaise trap K31T4; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 29 Dec. 2014–16 Jan. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2300 • 1 ♂; same data as preceding; Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 30 Jun. 2015–14 Jul. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5610. Non-type material (only diagnostic characters checked): UGANDA: • 109 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1250, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1251, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1252, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1257, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1258, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1260, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1264, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1269, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1271, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1282, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1335, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1365, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1526, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1695, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1720, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2569, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2799, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3010, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3077, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3095, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3100, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3103, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3104, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3459, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3495, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3496, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3529, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3542, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3611, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3638, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4375, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4738, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5594, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5598, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5599, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5603, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5612, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5615, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5617, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5621, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5624, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5627, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5634, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5636, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5638, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5639, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5649, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5654, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5659, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5661, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5664, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5666, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5667, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5671, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5676, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5677, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5680, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5685, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5686, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5691, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5695, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5696, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5706, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5707, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5710, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5711, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5715, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5716, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5718, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5721, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5723, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5724, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5735, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5745, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5747, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5751, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5753, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5756, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5759, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5760, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5761, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5769, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5770, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5776, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5782, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5786, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5796, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5799, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5800, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5802, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5809, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5810, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5812, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5813, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5819, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5826, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5827, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5830, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5837, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5840, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5841, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5842, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5843, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5847, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6015, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6043, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6050, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6051, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6053 • 47 ♂; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1351, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1359, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1588, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1791, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2170, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2505, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2622, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2647, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3098, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3099, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3528, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3684, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3694, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4322, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4514, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4636, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4641, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5588, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5590, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5602, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5611, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5633, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5651, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5656, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5660, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5682, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5700, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5703, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5714, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5730, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5731, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5744, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5746, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5777, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5779, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5795, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5828, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5833, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5848, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5852, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5859, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6046, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6047, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6048, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6049, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6052, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6054. Known material: 168 specimens (164 Ugandan, 4 other): 112 ♀, 44 ♂; Ugandan specimens caught by Malaise trap, data above and also in supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). 3 ♀, 5 ♂; Ugandan hand-netted specimens, data above and also in supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). 1 ♀, 3 ♂; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), data above in material examined. This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of a half-elliptical apical horn of the metasoma and a mostly smooth tergite 3. : frons with diverging median carinae, without clear lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron with an elevated flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn half-elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth.
Additional or updated characters.
Apart from the diagnosis, we provide the following additional or updated character traits to the description in Rousse and van Noort (2014). Female. Body length 11.4 mm–17.2 mm. Frons rugulose or smooth, often with more or less distinct rugae that fan out from the median carinae towards the ocelli. Antenna with 32–34 flagellar segments. Tergites mostly smooth, but with variable structure on some tergites (4–7 pubescent and anterior margins of 3–5 slightly punctate or striate in Ugandan specimens, 3–6 shallowly punctate with anterior striations in other specimens), tergite 1 2.2–2.5 times as long as apically wide. The Ugandan specimens are more orange than yellow in colour, generally have no dark spots on the lateral lobes of the mesoscutum, and the colour of their interocellar area varies from orange (most frequent) to black. Male. Body length 11.5 mm–14.1 mm. Antenna with 31–33 flagellar segments. Anterior margin of tergite 3 sometimes neither punctate nor striate. Tergite 1 2.5–3.0 times as long as apically wide. Males are smaller than females on average. Democratic Republic of Congo, Cameroon. New record: Uganda.
Biology.
In Uganda, this species was most abundantly caught in primary forest near decaying wood, during the dry season (Hopkins et al. 2019b). It has not been caught outside the forest. Many of the hand-netted individuals were caught after landing on a fallen tree trunk ( Robyns & Ghesq.). The males especially seemed to be repeatedly visiting the tree. female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5853), a species found in Uganda. 7 Habitus 8 face and clypeus 9 frons 10 hypostomal flange 11 mesopleuron dorsal margin 12 apical horn of metasoma 13 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (8–13), 1 mm (7). Hopkins sp. nov. 35061147-23AF-5725-8208-155D6A1A3118 http://zoobank.org/67413463-3BD1-4812-B6F5-DA6E768ABE03 Figs 14–20
Figures 14–20.

female (holotype http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4920), a new species from Uganda. 14 habitus 15 face and clypeus 16 frons 17 hypostomal flange 18 mesopleuron dorsal margin 19 apical horn of metasoma 20 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (15–20), 1 mm (14).

Type material: UGANDA: • 1 ♀, holotype; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site R03, Malaise trap R03T2; (WGS84); alt. 1490 m (GPS, WGS84); 7 May 2015–21 May 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4920. Known material: One specimen (1 ♀, Ugandan specimen, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of a smooth frons without median carinae and a laterally absent epicnemial carina. No other species has the same colour pattern. : frons without median carinae, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina laterally absent. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth.
Description (female).
Body length 8.4 mm. : Frons without median carinae, without lateral carinae, smooth or very faintly striate. Occipital carina interrupted dorsally and interrupted or extremely faint near hypostomal carina. Hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to maximum width of second maxillary palp segment. Face smooth or very faintly punctate. Clypeus sparsely punctate, with a median apical tubercle. Antenna with 28 flagellar segments. : Subalar prominence without a lateral flange. Mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin. Epicnemial carina laterally absent. Fore wing with 2m-cu distal to rs-m. : Tip of apical horn elliptical (flattened ellipse) in posterior view. Tergites mostly smooth, anterior of tergites 2–6 medially striate, tergite 1 1.2 times as long as apically wide. : General colour orange. Other colour: white face, lower 1/4 of genae, lateral frons, black mandibles, median frons, occiput, upper genae, and median spot on apical half of tergite 6 and entire tergite 7, dark brown hind tarsi. Antennae black. Ovipositor sheaths dark testaceous. Wings hyaline, faintly infuscate near apex. Male. Unknown.
Etymology.
Dedicated to Johanna Hopkins, the first author’s wife. This species is known from only one, quite exceptional, female specimen. Uganda.
Remarks.
Only one specimen was caught during 382 trap months of sampling, in a habitat (successional forest logged 2002–2004) that generally yielded few rhyssines. female (holotype http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4920), a new species from Uganda. 14 habitus 15 face and clypeus 16 frons 17 hypostomal flange 18 mesopleuron dorsal margin 19 apical horn of metasoma 20 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (15–20), 1 mm (14). Benoit, 1951 66E92BAF-B28F-5DCC-AE05-8C219A9C55BE Figs 21–24
Figures 21–24.

female (paratype RMCA-ENT-000017924). This species was not found in Uganda. 21 Habitus 22 hypostomal flange 23 mesopleuron dorsal margin 24 apical horn of metasoma. Scale bars 1 mm (22–24), 5 mm (21). Figures courtesy of RMCA (Stéphane Hanot).

Type material: DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: • 1 ♀, holotype; Bambesa []; Dec. 1933; “J.V. Leroy”; RMCARMCA-ENT-000017923 • 1 ♀, paratype; Ubangui-Bumba; Dec. 1939; H. de Saeger; RMCARMCA-ENT-000017924. Known material: Two specimens (2 ♀, see Rousse and van Noort 2014, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of converging median carinae on the frons, the absence of lateral carinae on the frons, an epicnemial carina that reaches high onto the mesopleuron, and a mostly smooth tergite 3. No other species is known to have a black mesosternum. : frons with median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height slightly greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth. Democratic Republic of Congo. female (paratype RMCA-ENT-000017924). This species was not found in Uganda. 21 Habitus 22 hypostomal flange 23 mesopleuron dorsal margin 24 apical horn of metasoma. Scale bars 1 mm (22–24), 5 mm (21). Figures courtesy of RMCA (Stéphane Hanot). Benoit, 1952 45CF9BA7-12CB-5EC0-A793-D2F010E23EE9 Figs 25–27
Figures 25–27.

male (25: holotype, 26–27: SAM–HYM–P049437). This species was not found in Uganda. 25 Habitus 26 hypostomal flange 27 mesopleuron dorsal margin. Figure 25 is from van Noort (2019).

Non-type material: CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC: • 1 ♂; Préfecture Sangha-Mbaéré, Parc National de Dzanga-Ndoki (38.6 km, 173 degrees S of Lidjombo); ; alt. 350 m; 27 May 2001; Simon van Noort leg.; Handnet; CAR01-H25; Lowland rainforest; SAMC SAM–HYM–P049437. Known material: Three specimens (0 Ugandan, 3 other): 1 ♂, holotype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Democratic Republic of Congo, Albertville [Kalemie, ]; Jul. 1918; “R. Mayné”; MRAC. 1 ♂, paratype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Democratic Republic of Congo, Bambesa; Dec. 1946; “P.L. Benoit”; MRAC. 1 ♂; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), data above in material examined. This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the epicnemial carina only just reaching the mesopleuron. The fore wing colour pattern makes it instantly recognisable. : frons with median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina short, barely extending onto mesopleuron. : tip of apical horn of unknown shape (no females are known); tergite 3 mostly smooth. Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic. male (25: holotype, 26–27: SAM–HYM–P049437). This species was not found in Uganda. 25 Habitus 26 hypostomal flange 27 mesopleuron dorsal margin. Figure 25 is from van Noort (2019). Seyrig, 1932 7D7269AD-B092-5787-A07F-A800D5E1FF5D Figs 28–31
Figures 28–31.

female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 28 Habitus 29 hypostomal flange 30 mesopleuron dorsal margin 31 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 28 is from van Noort (2019).

Type material: MADAGASCAR: • 1 ♀, paralectotype; Rogez, Forêt Cote Est; Mar. 1932; “A Seyrig”; NHMUK. Known material: Eight specimens (0 Ugandan, 8 other): 1 ♀, lectotype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Madagascar, Rogez []; Sep. 1930; “A. Seyrig”; MNHN EY8815. 3 ♂; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), same label data as lectotype. 1 ♀, paralectotype; previously unpublished specimen, data above in material examined. 1 ♀, 2 ♂; previously unpublished specimens, same data as paralectotype except collection dates Apr. 1931, Sep. 1932, Dec. 1932; NHMUK. This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of diverging median carinae on the frons, the lateral absence of the epicnemial carina, and an open areolet. Its yellow and black colour pattern is distinctive. : frons with median carinae diverging towards ocelli, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina laterally absent. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth. Madagascar. female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 28 Habitus 29 hypostomal flange 30 mesopleuron dorsal margin 31 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 28 is from van Noort (2019). Seyrig, 1937 89669B5F-6792-54AF-830F-660F2CE3E525 Figs 32–38
Figures 32–38.

male (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1280) and female (34: http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2291, 37: http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5766), a species found in Uganda. 32 Habitus 33 face and clypeus 34 frons 35 hypostomal flange 36 mesopleuron dorsal margin 37 apical horn of metasoma 38 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (33–38), 1 mm (32).

Non-type material: UGANDA: • 1 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 10 Mar. 2015–24 Mar. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1249 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K31, Malaise trap K31T4; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 16 Jul. 2015–30 Jul. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2291 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 18 Nov. 2014–2 Dec. 2014; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5591 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site R93, Malaise trap R93T2; (WGS84); alt. 1510 m (GPS, WGS84); 20 May 2015–1 Jun. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5766 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site HILL, Malaise trap HILLT1; (WGS84); alt. 1520 m (GPS, WGS84); 30 Jul. 2015–13 Aug. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6013 • 1 ♂; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site K31, Malaise trap K31T2; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 9 Apr. 2015–23 Apr. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1280 • 1 ♂; same data as preceding; Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 24 Feb. 2015–10 Mar. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5738 • 1 ♂; same data as preceding; Site K31, Malaise trap K31T3; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 26 Aug. 2015–12 Sep. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5792. Non-type material (only diagnostic characters checked): UGANDA: • 56 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1261, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1262, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1270, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1336, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1337, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1338, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1345, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1364, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1721, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1761, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1762, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1820, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2056, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2058, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2161, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2706, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2724, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2856, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2985, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3080, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3092, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3541, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3737, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5595, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5600, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5626, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5630, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5640, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5645, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5658, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5672, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5674, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5675, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5697, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5704, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5720, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5727, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5728, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5729, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5741, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5742, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5749, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5752, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5773, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5781, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5783, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5784, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5789, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5791, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5793, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5798, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5814, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5815, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5818, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5822, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5839 • 14 ♂; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2906, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3086, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3089, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3642, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5622, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5652, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5758, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5767, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5771, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5785, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5790, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5832, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5838, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5877 • 1 unknown sex; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6045. Known material: 81 specimens (79 Ugandan, 2 other): 61 ♀, 17 ♂, 1 U; Ugandan specimens, data above and also in supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). 1 ♀, holotype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Democratic Republic of Congo, Lulua [], Kapanga; Apr. 1933; “F.G. Overlaet”; “R. Dét”; MRAC “F 3330”. 1 ♀; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Cameroon, Nkoemvon; Jul. 1980-Aug. 1980; “Ms. D. Jackson”; NHMUK. male (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1280) and female (34: http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2291, 37: http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5766), a species found in Uganda. 32 Habitus 33 face and clypeus 34 frons 35 hypostomal flange 36 mesopleuron dorsal margin 37 apical horn of metasoma 38 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (33–38), 1 mm (32). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of converging median carinae on the frons, lateral carinae on the frons, and the absence of a lateral flange on the subalar prominence. In practice its unique colour pattern and large size make it instantly recognisable. : frons with strong median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, with lateral carinae curving towards lateral ocelli; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height slightly greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron with a raised flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn almost circular in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth.
Description (male).
Body length 16.4 mm–25.1 mm. Males seem slightly smaller than females on average. : Frons with strong median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, with lateral carinae curving towards lateral ocelli, often with faint traces of lateral rugae. Occipital carina interrupted dorsally. Hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height slightly greater than maximum width of second maxillary palp segment. Face punctate. Clypeus punctate, without a clear median apical tubercle. Antenna with 38–40 flagellar segments. : Subalar prominence without a lateral flange. Mesopleuron with a raised flange along dorsal margin. Epicnemial carina reaches approximate height of mesopleural pit. Fore wing with 2m-cu distal to rs-m. : Tergites 1–5 mostly smooth, 6–7 smooth or sparsely pubescent, tergite 1 1.8–2.2 times as long as apically wide. : General colour mottled dark testaceous, testaceous and pale yellow, pale yellow patches of tergites 1 and 2 are fused (cf. female). Antennae black. Wings hyaline, infuscate near apex. Additional or updated characters. Apart from the diagnosis and description of the male, we provide the following additional or updated character traits to the description in Rousse and van Noort (2014). Female. Body length 14.7 mm–37.8 mm. Frons often with faint traces of lateral rugae. Face punctate, transversely rugulose-punctate or transversely striate. Antenna with 38–43 flagellar segments (38–41 in Ugandan specimens). Tergites 1–5 mostly smooth, 6–7 often pubescent, anterior margins of tergites 3–6 (sometimes only 4–5) sightly striate or punctate, tergite 1 1.4–1.8 times as long as apically wide. The colour patches vary in extent, with the pale yellow patches of tergite 1 fused in small individuals. Democratic Republic of Congo, Cameroon. New record: Uganda. In Uganda, this species was mostly caught in primary forest near decaying wood (Hopkins et al. 2019b). It has not been caught outside the forest. was earlier known from only two females. We describe the male for the first time.

sp. nov.

5CA38040-F440-5B6D-928F-FCD9E282FED5 http://zoobank.org/9BABD7C8-7644-45BA-9985-96408F898402 Figs 39–45
Figures 39–45.

female (holotype http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788), a new species from Uganda. 39 Habitus 40 face and clypeus 41 frons 42 hypostomal flange 43 mesopleuron dorsal margin 44 apical horn of metasoma 45 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (40–45), 1 mm (39).

Type material: UGANDA: • 1 ♀, holotype; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 11 Aug. 2015–25 Aug. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788 • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as preceding; Site R03, Malaise trap R03T2; (WGS84); alt. 1490 m (GPS, WGS84); 21 May 2015–4 Jun. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1500 • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as preceding; Site K31, Malaise trap K31T3; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 23 May 2015–4 Jun. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4238 • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as preceding; Site K30S, Malaise trap K30ST4; (WGS84); alt. 1420 m (GPS, WGS84); 2 Dec. 2014–15 Dec. 2014; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5743 • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as preceding; Site R01, Malaise trap R01T2; (WGS84); alt. 1600 m (GPS, WGS84); 27 Mar. 2015–10 Apr. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5801 • 1 ♂, paratype; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 2 Jun. 2015–17 Jun. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3074 • 1 ♂, paratype; same data as preceding; Site K30S, Malaise trap K30ST2; (WGS84); alt. 1480 m (GPS, WGS84); 5 May 2015–19 May 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4000 • 1 ♂, paratype; same data as preceding; Site K15, Malaise trap K15T4; (WGS84); alt. 1510 m (GPS, WGS84); 4 May 2015–20 May 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5836. Non-type material (only diagnostic characters checked): UGANDA • 18 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1259, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2057, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2203, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2358, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2627, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3199, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3649, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4866, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5596, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5647, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5679, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5712, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5717, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5736, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5803, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5804, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5805, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5835 • 20 ♂; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1350, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1355, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1401, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1765, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2645, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2657, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2803, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3076, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3081, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3087, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3097, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3761, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3876, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4990, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5143, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5609, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5768, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5787, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5831, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.6033. female (holotype http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5788), a new species from Uganda. 39 Habitus 40 face and clypeus 41 frons 42 hypostomal flange 43 mesopleuron dorsal margin 44 apical horn of metasoma 45 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (40–45), 1 mm (39). Known material: 46 specimens (23 ♀, 23 ♂, Ugandan specimens, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the distinctive pattern of striation on the frons and the densely striate tergite 3. No other species has the same colour pattern. : frons without median carinae, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 densely striate. Body length 8.5 mm–14.3 mm (holotype 12.3 mm). : Frons without clear median carinae, without lateral carinae, with faint median rugae that fan out towards ocelli. Occipital carina interrupted dorsally. Hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to maximum width of second maxillary palp segment. Face densely and deeply punctate. Clypeus with little or no punctation, with a median apical tubercle. Antenna with 30–33 flagellar segments (32 in holotype). : Subalar prominence without a lateral flange. Mesopleuron without a flange along dorsal margin. Epicnemial carina reaches approximate height of mesopleural pit. Fore wing with 2m-cu varying from clearly distal to opposite rs-m. : Tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view. Tergites 1–5 with dense, light, predominantly longitudinal striation and punctation, 6–7 smoother and more pubescent, tergite 1 1.9–2.4 times as long as apically wide (1.9 in holotype). : General colour mottled black and white with metasoma orange testaceous from tergite 3 onwards. Hind tibia dark brown. Antennae black. Ovipositor sheaths black to dark testaceous. Wings hyaline. : Colour of the dark patches of the legs varies from entirely black to testaceous, the black and white metasomal colour extends onto tergite 3 in some individuals. Male. Similar to female. Body length 7.9 mm–10.4 mm. T1 3.2–3.6. Antenna with 29–33 flagellar segments. Males are smaller than females on average. Refers to the colour pattern which is reminiscent of the plains zebra, especially its extinct subspecies, the . Uganda. In Uganda, this species was most abundantly caught during the dry season (Hopkins et al. 2019b). It has not been caught outside the forest. It appears to be attracted to decaying wood (although the sample size is too small for statistical significance). Rousse & van Noort, 2014 A6876924-1D85-54F2-9137-0068EA7EE919 Figs 46–49
Figures 46–49.

female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 46 Habitus 47 hypostomal flange 48 mesopleuron dorsal margin 49 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 46 is from van Noort (2019).

Type material: SOUTH AFRICA: • 1 ♀, holotype; Natal, 2831 Dd Umlalazi Nat. Res., 1.5 km E of Mtunzini; ; Nov. 1978; R. M. Miller leg.; indigenous forest; Malaise trap; NMSA. Known material: One specimen (1 ♀, see Rousse and van Noort 2014, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of a low hypostomal flange, an elliptical apical horn of the metasoma, and a punctate (over 50% of surface) tergite 3. : frons with median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 punctate. South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal). female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 46 Habitus 47 hypostomal flange 48 mesopleuron dorsal margin 49 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 46 is from van Noort (2019). Rousse & van Noort, 2014 94BAA882-EAC4-5CE6-ADB0-78992535B321 Figs 50–56
Figures 50–56.

female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663, 52: http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3234), a species found in Uganda. 50 Habitus 51 face and clypeus 52 frons 53 hypostomal flange 54 mesopleuron dorsal margin 55 apical horn of metasoma 56 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (51–56), 1 mm (50).

Non-type material: UGANDA: • 1 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site K30, Malaise trap K30T2; (WGS84); alt. 1490 m (GPS, WGS84); 26 Aug. 2015–9 Sep. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1273 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K15, Malaise trap K15T1; (WGS84); alt. 1490 m (GPS, WGS84); 20 Apr. 2015–4 May 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1333 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site HILL, Malaise trap HILLT2; (WGS84); alt. 1510 m (GPS, WGS84); 4 Jun. 2015–18 Jun. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3234 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K30S, Malaise trap K30ST3; (WGS84); alt. 1480 m (GPS, WGS84); 19 May 2015–2 Jun. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5628 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K30, Malaise trap K30T3; (WGS84); alt. 1540 m (GPS, WGS84); 14 Jul. 2015–28 Jul. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site R93, Malaise trap R93T2; (WGS84); alt. 1510 m (GPS, WGS84); 9 Mar. 2015–23 Mar. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5705. Known material: 10 specimens (6 Ugandan, 4 other): 6 ♀; Ugandan specimens, data above and also in supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). 1 ♀, holotype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Cameroon, Nkoemvon []; 16 Mar. 1980–4 May 1980; “Ms. D. Jackson”; NHMUK. 1 ♀, paratype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), same data as holotype. 1 ♀, paratype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), same data as holotype except 30 Mar. 1980–19 Apr. 1980. 1 ♀, paratype; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), same data as holotype except Korup; 1981; “Mrs D. Jackson” This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of a half-elliptical apical horn of the metasoma and a punctate (over 50% of surface) tergite 3. is also predominantly yellow with black spots, but its subalar prominence has a lateral flange. : frons with weak median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, its height slightly less than or equivalent to the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn half-elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 densely punctate. Apart from the diagnosis, we provide the following additional or updated character traits to the description in Rousse and van Noort (2014). Female. Body length 7.2 mm–12.7 mm. Frons without rugae or with faint lateral rugae curving towards lateral ocelli. Face punctate or transversely rugulose-punctate. Clypeus longitudinally strigose and sparsely punctate. Antenna with 28–29 flagellar segments. Tergites 1 mostly smooth, 2–7 punctate (2 sometimes only punctate laterally), anterior margins of 5–6 often striate, tergite 1 1.2–1.5 times as long as apically wide. The Ugandan specimens have black anterior median spots on tergites 1–7 (ranging from very small on tergite 1 to reaching posterior margin on tergite 7), not just on tergites 4–7. Cameroon. New record: Uganda. female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5663, 52: http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3234), a species found in Uganda. 50 Habitus 51 face and clypeus 52 frons 53 hypostomal flange 54 mesopleuron dorsal margin 55 apical horn of metasoma 56 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (51–56), 1 mm (50). Benoit, 1951 7E4997D9-C669-5140-B122-21AF66A1328B Figs 57–63 , 64–67
Figures 57–63.

female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2520), a species found in Uganda. 57 Habitus 58 face and clypeus 59 frons 60 hypostomal flange 61 mesopleuron dorsal margin 62 apical horn of metasoma 63 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (58–63), 1 mm (57).

Figures 64–67.

female (holotype). We treat this species as a synonym of in this work. 64 Habitus 65 hypostomal flange 66 mesopleuron dorsal margin 67 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 64 is from van Noort (2019).

Rousse & van Noort, 2014, syn. nov. Type material: CAMEROON: • 1 ♀, holotype of ; Nkoemvon [Nko’emvon]; ; 16 Mar. 1980–4 May 1980; NHMUK type number HYM 3b.2832. Non-type material: UGANDA • 1 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site K31, Malaise trap K31T4; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 16 Jul. 2015–30 Jul. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2292 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K30, Malaise trap K30T3; (WGS84); alt. 1540 m (GPS, WGS84); 21 Apr. 2015–5 May 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2520 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K31, Malaise trap K31T4; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 30 Jan. 2015–13 Feb. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2878 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K13, Malaise trap K13T1; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 13 Jul. 2015–27 Jul. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5665 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K30, Malaise trap K30T2; (WGS84); alt. 1490 m (GPS, WGS84); 2 Dec. 2014–15 Dec. 2014; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5689 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site CC, Malaise trap CCT1; (WGS84); alt. 1450 m (GPS, WGS84); 27 Jan. 2015–10 Feb. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5732 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; 24 Feb. 2015–10 Mar. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5739 • 1 ♀; same data as preceding; Site K30S, Malaise trap K30ST4; (WGS84); alt. 1420 m (GPS, WGS84); 30 Jun. 2015–14 Jul. 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5844 • 1 ♂; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara, Site R93, Malaise trap R93T2; (WGS84); alt. 1510 m (GPS, WGS84); 20 May 2015–1 Jun. 2015; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5765 • 1 ♂; same data as preceding; Site K13, Malaise trap K13T1; (WGS84); alt. 1460 m (GPS, WGS84); 4 May 2015–20 May 2015; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5807. Non-type material (only diagnostic characters checked): UGANDA: • 150 ♀; Kibale National Park, Kanyawara; Tapani Hopkins leg.; ZMUThttp://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1265, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1266, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1267, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1268, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1272, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1334, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1366, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1367, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1375, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1499, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1673, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1677, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1763, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1764, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.1807, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2015, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2152, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2162, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2165, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2172, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2299, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2317, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2340, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2361, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2362, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2364, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2473, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2573, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2640, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2642, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2643, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2644, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2646, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2648, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2887, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2910, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3022, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3090, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3091, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3093, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3094, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3096, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3102, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3106, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3135, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3225, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3259, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3262, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3334, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3438, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3452, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3619, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3698, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3743, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3745, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3747, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.3947, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4424, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4512, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.4517, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5086, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5315, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5381, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5542, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5589, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5593, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5597, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5601, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5605, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5606, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5607, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5608, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5613, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5614, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5616, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5618, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5619, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5620, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5623, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5625, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5629, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5631, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5632, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5635, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5637, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5641, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5642, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5643, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5644, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5646, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5648, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5650, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5653, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5655, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5657, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5662, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5668, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5669, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5670, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5673, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5678, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5681, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5683, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5684, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5687, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5688, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5690, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5692, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5693, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5694, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5698, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5699, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5702, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5708, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5709, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5719, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5722, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5725, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5726, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5733, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5734, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5740, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5748, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5750, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5754, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5755, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5757, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5762, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5763, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5764, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5772, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5774, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5775, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5778, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5780, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5794, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5797, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5806, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5808, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5811, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5816, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5817, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5821, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5823, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5824, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5825, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5829, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5834, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5845, http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5846. Known material: 167 specimens (160 Ugandan, 7 other): 158 ♀, 2 ♂; Ugandan specimens, data above and also in supplementary material (Hopkins et al. 2019c). 1 ♀, holotype of ; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), data above in material examined. 1 ♀, holotype of ; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Democratic Republic of Congo, Haut-Uele, Paulis [Isiro, ]; Dec. 1947; “P.L.G. Benoit”; MRAC. 1 ♂, paratype of ; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Democratic Republic of Congo, Bambesa; Jul. 1933; “H.J. Bredo”; MRAC. 1 ♀; see Rousse and van Noort (2014); Cameroon, Nkoemvon; 30 Mar. 1980–19 Apr. 1980; “Ms. D. Jackson”; NHMUK. 2 ♀; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), same data as previous except 13 Jul. 1980–4 Aug. 1980. 1 ♀; see Rousse and van Noort (2014), same data as previous except Oct. 1980–Nov. 1980. female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.2520), a species found in Uganda. 57 Habitus 58 face and clypeus 59 frons 60 hypostomal flange 61 mesopleuron dorsal margin 62 apical horn of metasoma 63 tergites 1–7. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (58–63), 1 mm (57). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by its subalar prominence having a lateral flange. is also predominantly yellow with black spots but lacks the flange. : frons with median carinae converging before continuing towards median ocellus, with lateral carinae curving towards lateral ocelli; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence with a lateral flange; mesopleuron with a raised flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth. Apart from the diagnosis, we provide the following additional or updated character traits to the description in Rousse and van Noort (2014). Female. Body length 9.8 mm–15.7 mm (15.7 mm holotype, 9.8 mm–15.1 mm other specimens). Frons with more or less distinct rugae parallel to the lateral carinae, often as distinct as the lateral carinae. Clypeus sparsely punctate or smooth. Antenna with 30–35+ flagellar segments (30–33 in Ugandan specimens, at least 35 in type, 30–34 in other specimens). Fore wing with 2m-cu varying from clearly distal to only just distal to rs-m. Tip of apical horn with an extra dorsal projection in one aberrant female (http://mus.utu.fi/ZMUT.5844). Tergites mostly smooth, except with varied amount of punctation on tergites 3–7 (anteriorly punctate 3–6 in many Ugandan specimens, punctate 3–6 in most non-Ugandan specimens, punctate apex of 5 and 6–7 in holotype), anterior margins of 3–5 or 3–6 often striate, tergite 1 1.2–1.7 times as long as apically wide (1.7 in holotype, 1.2–1.5 in other specimens). The Ugandan specimens have black posterior margins of tergites 2–7 (sometimes faint or patchy, especially on anterior tergites) and median stripes on 4–7 (strongest on 5–6). Non-Ugandan specimens sometimes have black median stripes on 5–7, or 3–6 in the holotype. Male. Body length 8.5 mm–8.7 mm. Antenna with 30 flagellar segments. Tergites 4–7 faintly pubescent, tergite anterior margins smooth, or lightly striate and punctate, tergite 1 1.5–2.0 times as long as apically wide. The two Ugandan males are smaller than females on average. Democratic Republic of Congo, Cameroon. New record: Uganda. In Uganda, this species was most abundantly caught in primary forest near decaying wood, during the dry season (Hopkins et al. 2019b). It has not been caught outside the forest. This species is quite variable, but we are unable to find morphological characters that would reliably split it into more than one species. We propose that (of which there is only one specimen) is a synonym of . It was mainly distinguished from by the punctate clypeus and slender tergite 1, but the Ugandan specimens generally have a punctate clypeus and a stout tergite 1. These two characters also vary considerably in the Ugandan specimens and seem to represent intraspecific variation. The Ugandan material has a very skewed sex ratio with 158 female specimens collected and only two males. female (holotype). We treat this species as a synonym of in this work. 64 Habitus 65 hypostomal flange 66 mesopleuron dorsal margin 67 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 64 is from van Noort (2019). Rousse & van Noort, 2014 C8AD2480-43A0-52F4-9C2B-51A04A3F54DA Figs 68–71
Figures 68–71.

female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 68 Habitus 69 hypostomal flange 70 mesopleuron dorsal margin 71 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 68 is from van Noort (2019).

Type material: NIGERIA: • 1 ♀, holotype; “Ilorin Prov.” []; “18 Jun. 192” [18 Jun 1921?]; “De. G.W.S. Macfie” leg.; “Pres. by Imp. Bur. Ent. 1921–129”; NHMUK. Known material: One specimen (1 ♀, see Rousse and van Noort 2014, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the combination of lateral carinae on the frons and the absence of a raised flange on the dorsal margin of the mesopleuron. No other species has the same colour pattern. : frons with median carinae diverging towards ocelli, with lateral carinae curving towards lateral ocelli; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. : tip of apical horn elliptical in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth. Nigeria. female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 68 Habitus 69 hypostomal flange 70 mesopleuron dorsal margin 71 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 68 is from van Noort (2019). Ashmead, 1900 08CA33FC-BBEC-5FC1-8D5E-6CF0779A36D9 Holmgren, 1859: 122. Shulz, 1906: 115. Derksen, 1941: 721. The genus is easily recognised in the Afrotropical region by the presence of the fore wing areolet (vein 3rs-m is present), whereas vein 3rs-m is missing in , the only other rhyssine genus found in the Afrotropical region. can be distinguished from other rhyssine genera by the presence of an areolet (cf. ), the lack of an anterior glymma on tergite 1 (cf. ), the upper tooth not being subdivided (cf. ), tergite 1 having anterior lateral carinae (cf. which lacks carinae), the occipital carina joining the hypostomal carina some distance from the mandible base (cf. ) and tergites 3–6 not being transversely, non-uniformly aciculate (cf. ) (Baltazar 1964, Porter 2001). The genus includes the largest species of . Afrotropical region: Democratic Republic of Congo. The genus is cosmopolitan with the largest number of species found in the Oriental and Palaearctic regions. Seyrig, 1937 B7534017-F63C-5CB3-91B3-3BCF6209247F Figs 72–75
Figures 72–75.

female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 72 Habitus 73 mesopleuron dorsal margin 74 hypostomal flange 75 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 72 is from van Noort (2019), 73–75 courtesy of MNHN (Agnièle Touret-Alby).

Type material: DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: • 1 ♀, holotype; “reg. Lac Kivu”, “Kadjudju” [Kajuju, ]; 1932; MNHN EY8831. Known material: One specimen (1 ♀, see Rousse and van Noort 2014, data above). This species can be distinguished from other Afrotropical by the presence of a closed areolet. No other species has the same colour pattern. : frons with median carinae diverging towards ocelli, without lateral carinae; hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, its height slightly greater than the maximum width of the second maxillary palp segment. : subalar prominence without a lateral flange; mesopleuron without a flange along the dorsal margin; epicnemial carina laterally absent. : tip of apical horn almost circular in posterior view; tergite 3 mostly smooth. Democratic Republic of Congo. female (holotype). This species was not found in Uganda. 72 Habitus 73 mesopleuron dorsal margin 74 hypostomal flange 75 apical horn of metasoma. Figure 72 is from van Noort (2019), 73–75 courtesy of MNHN (Agnièle Touret-Alby).

Discussion

Sampling tropical ichneumonids for a year with numerous Malaise traps gave us an unprecedented sample size. We caught 456 individuals of the subfamily , which in the Afrotropical region was earlier known from only 30 published specimen records (Rousse and van Noort 2014). This clearly demonstrates the advantage of extensive, long-term sampling in the tropics. Although the method is laborious, involving a full year of sampling and several years processing the samples, it provides much greater sample sizes than the more limited sampling which is often the norm due to logistical constraints (see Owen and Chanter 1970, van Noort et al. 2000, van Noort 2004). We were also able to obtain information on the phenology and habitat use of species, by linking to vegetation and weather data (Hopkins et al. 2019b). Our results strongly support the idea that the Afrotropical region contains a large number of rhyssine species, most of which have simply not been discovered due to insufficient sampling (Rousse and van Noort 2014). Two of the six species at our site were new to science. New information was also obtained on, for example, the male of and the synonymy of with . It is clear that sampling at other Afrotropical sites would reveal numerous new species, and considerably update our knowledge of described species. Further sampling would likely uncover more species even at our site; we caught only one individual of sp. nov., for example, which demonstrates that our site is still under-sampled. Our results also support the claim by Quicke (2012) that it is too early to draw conclusions on how ichneumonid species richness is distributed on our planet. Before this work, no rhyssines were known from our site despite our having sampled there before (Hopkins et al. 2018, SvN pers. obs.). After this work, the species count is six, and further sampling would likely discover more. In such circumstances, any attempt to compare the species richness of different sites may end up merely comparing sample sizes. Of two recent studies that made this attempt, one found the highest rhyssine and pimpline richness at Allpahuayo-Mishana in Amazonia, which may be due to the fact it is also one of the best sampled sites (Gómez et al. 2017). The other study showed that even well sampled sites are so under-sampled that species richness and sample size are interchangeable (Timms et al. 2016, although note that the authors interpret this result differently). Much more sampling, especially in the tropics, will be needed before we can draw conclusions on ichneumonid species richness distributions.
1Fore wing with a closed areolet (Fig. 2A).[Black and orange species with infuscate wings; Fig. 72] Megarhyssa babaulti Seyrig, 1937
–Fore wing without an areolet (Fig. 2B) 2
2Subalar prominence with a lateral flange (Fig. 2C).[Yellow species with black markings; Fig. 57] Epirhyssa uelensis Benoit, 1951
–Subalar prominence without a lateral flange (Fig. 2D) 3
3Dorsal margin of mesopleuron with a raised flange (Fig. 2D) 4
–Dorsal margin of mesopleuron without a raised flange (Fig. 2E) 5
4Apical horn of metasoma shaped like an ellipse in posterior view (Fig. 2F), frons with median carinae that converge before the ocelli, frons with lateral carinae. [Red, yellow, and black species; Fig. 32] Epirhyssa overlaeti Seyrig, 1937
–Apical horn of metasoma shaped like a half-ellipse in posterior view (Fig. 2G), frons with median carinae that diverge before continuing towards the lateral ocelli, frons without lateral carinae. [Orange species, sometimes with black markings; Fig. 7] Epirhyssa ghesquierei Seyrig, 1937
5Epicnemial carina laterally absent, does not reach mesopleuron 6
–Epicnemial carina present on mesopleuron 7
6Frons with median carinae that diverge before continuing towards the lateral ocelli (cf. Fig. 1B). [Yellow species with black on metasoma; Fig. 28] Epirhyssa migratoria Seyrig, 1932
–Frons smooth, without median carinae (Fig. 2H). [Predominantly orange species; Fig. 14] Epirhyssa johanna sp. nov.
7Frons with median carinae that diverge before continuing towards the lateral ocelli (cf. Fig. 1B), frons with lateral carinae. [Black and orange species with infuscate wings; Fig. 68] Epirhyssa villemantae Rousse & van Noort, 2014
–Frons with median carinae that converge before the ocelli or without median carinae (Fig. 2I), frons without lateral carinae (Fig. 2I) 8
8Tergite 3 densely striate (Fig. 2J), frons striate but without median carinae. [Black, white and orange species; Fig. 39] Epirhyssa quagga sp. nov.
–Tergite 3 mostly smooth or mostly punctate (Fig. 2K), frons with median carinae 9
9Tergite 3 mostly smooth 10
–Tergite 3 mostly punctate, over 50% of surface (Fig. 2K) 11
10Epicnemial carina only just reaches the mesopleuron. [Hypostomal carina raised into a low flange, yellow-orange species with yellow and infuscate wings; Fig. 25] Epirhyssa maynei Benoit, 1952
–Epicnemial carina long, reaches the approximate height of the mesopleural pit. [Hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange, yellow species with black mesosternum; Fig. 21] Epirhyssa leroyi Benoit, 1951
11Hypostomal carina raised into an elevated flange (Fig. 2L, see also Fig. 1D). [Black and white species; Fig. 3] Epirhyssa brianfisheri Rousse & van Noort, 2014
–Hypostomal carina raised into a low flange (Fig. 2M, see also Fig. 1E) 12
12Apical horn of metasoma shaped like a half-ellipse in posterior view (Fig. 2N). [Yellow species with black markings as in Fig. 50] Epirhyssa tombeaodiba Rousse & van Noort, 2014
–Apical horn of metasoma shaped like an ellipse in posterior view (Fig. 2O). [Yellow species with black markings as in Fig. 46] Epirhyssa shaka Rousse & van Noort, 2014
  2 in total

1.  We know too little about parasitoid wasp distributions to draw any conclusions about latitudinal trends in species richness, body size and biology.

Authors:  Donald L J Quicke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Extensive sampling reveals the phenology and habitat use of Afrotropical parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Rhyssinae).

Authors:  Tapani Hopkins; Heikki Roininen; Ilari E Sääksjärvi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.963
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Revision of the endemic Afrotropical genus Tetractenion (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) with an identification key to genera of Banchinae for the region.

Authors:  Terry Reynolds Berry; Simon van Noort
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 1.492
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.