Adolescent self-harm: over-the-counter medicines fly under the radar.

We read with interest the recent article on adolescent self-harm by Joel King and co-authors.1 It is important that clinicians, patients and families are aware of the lack of evidence for prescription medicines in this area, and the potential benefits of psychological therapies.

The need for new strategies to address adolescent self-harm is increasingly urgent. Child and adolescent self-harm is rapidly increasing in Australia.2,3,4 We found a 98% increase in self-poisonings in people aged 5–19 years in 2006–2016, with a cohort effect showing that those born after 1997 are particularly at risk. The peak age of self-poisoning is getting younger. There is also a large increase in dispensing of psychotropic drugs to this cohort, particularly antidepressants,2 despite the lack of evidence for benefits.

The article mentioned harm minimisation by prescribing limited quantities of drugs. However, the problems presented by over-the-counter medicines were not addressed. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the top two drugs taken in overdose by young Australians2 and are widely available. Many countries do not allow non-pharmacy sales of these medicines,5 and in Denmark paracetamol can only be purchased by people aged over 18 years.6 The UK has restricted pack sizes of paracetamol to decrease harms from self-poisoning.7 Australia has room to move in this legislative space. The recent decisions by the Therapeutic Goods Administration to up-schedule modified-release paracetamol to Schedule 3 (Pharmacist Only) and paracetamol–codeine to Schedule 4 (Prescription Only) indicate the considerable scope for harm minimisation using strategic rescheduling.

Sonja Cabarkapa, Joel King and Fiona Leow, the authors of the article, comment:

The letter makes some valuable comments, especially regarding the urgency of this issue which is indeed cause for concern. The focus of our article was to address the commonly raised questions around treatment of self-harm in a GP setting. The letter offers pertinent considerations in prevention by addressing the restrictions on the sale of over-the-counter medicines and the legislative changes made by other countries. Similar strategies should be considered by the Australian Government.

Recent evidence suggests that self-harm displayed on social media poses a risk to vulnerable users through exposure leading to contagion.1a This combined with unlimited multimedia access and cyber-bullying are additional social factors that need addressing. While not all self-harm behaviour is followed by suicide, patients who self-harm remain at significant and persistent risk of suicide.2a

Self-harm remains a multifaceted issue requiring prompt attention from a societal viewpoint and prospective studies in this area remain limited. Further research can identify strategies to help reduce rates of self-harm which should be a major priority for national suicide prevention programs.