INTRODUCTION: Carers support programmes are commonly delivered in person, limiting attendance opportunities for rural carers and others who have access barriers. Studies using technology typically use text-based forums rather than real-time technology such as videoconferencing (VC). Delivering home-based carers support programmes by VC may mitigate barriers for accessing support. We report implementation findings for delivering a telehealth peer-support programme for isolated carers of people with dementia. METHODS:Participants were recruited through aged care providers, peak bodies and media activities. Inclusion criteria were primary dementia caregiver with Internet access and being socially or geographically isolated. The study design was a staggered randomised waitlist design. Measures included the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-6) and selected scales from the e-Health Literacy Questionnaire. Recruitment activities utilised digital processes. Participants completed a six-week programme delivered by VC. Qualitative data comprised logs detailing administration and IT procedures and difficulties. Post programme, 28 participants undertook semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS:There were 16 groups comprising 69 participants located throughout Australia, with 87% using their own devices. Technical issues were few but included connection problems, which were compounded by low digital literacy skills. Qualitative data themes included changing perceptions in using technology, differences in communicating by VC and technical support required. Recruitment activities were time-consuming and would benefit from IT tailored for group-based work. Eight groups continued to meet on a self-organised basis. DISCUSSION: Providing peer-support groups using telehealth may have the potential to develop self-sustaining peer networks for isolated caregivers of people with dementia.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Carers support programmes are commonly delivered in person, limiting attendance opportunities for rural carers and others who have access barriers. Studies using technology typically use text-based forums rather than real-time technology such as videoconferencing (VC). Delivering home-based carers support programmes by VC may mitigate barriers for accessing support. We report implementation findings for delivering a telehealth peer-support programme for isolated carers of people with dementia. METHODS:Participants were recruited through aged care providers, peak bodies and media activities. Inclusion criteria were primary dementia caregiver with Internet access and being socially or geographically isolated. The study design was a staggered randomised waitlist design. Measures included the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-6) and selected scales from the e-Health Literacy Questionnaire. Recruitment activities utilised digital processes. Participants completed a six-week programme delivered by VC. Qualitative data comprised logs detailing administration and IT procedures and difficulties. Post programme, 28 participants undertook semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were 16 groups comprising 69 participants located throughout Australia, with 87% using their own devices. Technical issues were few but included connection problems, which were compounded by low digital literacy skills. Qualitative data themes included changing perceptions in using technology, differences in communicating by VC and technical support required. Recruitment activities were time-consuming and would benefit from IT tailored for group-based work. Eight groups continued to meet on a self-organised basis. DISCUSSION: Providing peer-support groups using telehealth may have the potential to develop self-sustaining peer networks for isolated caregivers of people with dementia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Telehealth; dementia caregivers; digital literacy; implementation; videoconferencing
Authors: Carmen Moreno; Til Wykes; Silvana Galderisi; Merete Nordentoft; Nicolas Crossley; Nev Jones; Mary Cannon; Christoph U Correll; Louise Byrne; Sarah Carr; Eric Y H Chen; Philip Gorwood; Sonia Johnson; Hilkka Kärkkäinen; John H Krystal; Jimmy Lee; Jeffrey Lieberman; Carlos López-Jaramillo; Miia Männikkö; Michael R Phillips; Hiroyuki Uchida; Eduard Vieta; Antonio Vita; Celso Arango Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Clarissa Giebel; Kerry Hanna; Hilary Tetlow; Kym Ward; Justine Shenton; Jacqueline Cannon; Sarah Butchard; Aravind Komuravelli; Anna Gaughan; Ruth Eley; Carol Rogers; Manoj Rajagopal; Stan Limbert; Steve Callaghan; Rosie Whittington; Lisa Shaw; Mark Gabbay Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2021-03-11
Authors: Clare Wilding; Hilary Davis; Tshepo Rasekaba; Mohammad Hamiduzzaman; Kayla Royals; Jennene Greenhill; Megan E O'Connell; David Perkins; Michael Bauer; Debra Morgan; Irene Blackberry Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Claire Waddington; Emma Harding; Emilie V Brotherhood; Ian Davies Abbott; Suzanne Barker; Paul M Camic; Victory Ezeofor; Hannah Gardner; Adetola Grillo; Chris Hardy; Zoe Hoare; Roberta McKee-Jackson; Kirsten Moore; Trish O'Hara; Jennifer Roberts; Samuel Rossi-Harries; Aida Suarez-Gonzalez; Mary Pat Sullivan; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Millie Van Der Byl Williams; Jill Walton; Alicia Willoughby; Gill Windle; Eira Winrow; Olivia Wood; Nikki Zimmermann; Sebastian J Crutch; Joshua Stott Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-07-20