Clare L Burns1,2,3, Elizabeth C Ward2,3,4, Amy Gray5, Lisa Baker6, Brooke Cowie7, Natalie Winter8, Rukmani Rusch8, Robyn Saxon9, Sarah Barnes10, Jodie Turvey10. 1. Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia. 3. Centre for Research Excellence in Telehealth, The University of Queensland, Australia. 4. Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 5. Gayndah Community Health, Wide Bay Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 6. Wide Bay Rural Allied Health & Community Health Service, Wide Bay Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 7. Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 8. Cairns Hospital, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 9. Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia. 10. Charleville Hospital, South West Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Timely assessment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) by speech pathologists helps minimise patient risk, optimise quality of life, and limit healthcare costs. This study involved a multi-site implementation of a validated model for conducting adult clinical swallowing assessments via telepractice and examined its service outcomes, costs and consumer satisfaction. METHODS: Five hub-spoke telepractice services, encompassing 18 facilities were established across a public health service. Service implementation support, including training of the telepractice speech pathologists (T-SP) and healthcare support workers in each site, was facilitated by an experienced project officer. New referrals from spoke sites were managed by the hub T-SP as per published protocols for dysphagia assessments via telepractice. Data was collected on existing service models prior to implementation, and then patient demographics, referral information, session outcomes, costs and patient and T-SP satisfaction when using telepractice. RESULTS: The first 50 sessions were analysed. Referrals were predominantly for inpatients at spoke sites. Telepractice assessments were completed successfully, with only minor technical issues. Changes to patient management (i.e. food/fluid changes post assessment) to optimise safety or progress oral intake, was required for 64% of patients. Service and cost efficiencies were achieved with an average 2-day reduction in waiting time and an average cost benefit of $218 per session when using the telepractice service over standard care. High clinician and patient satisfaction was reported. CONCLUSION: Telepractice services were successfully introduced across multiple sites, and achieved service and cost benefits with high consumer satisfaction.
INTRODUCTION: Timely assessment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) by speech pathologists helps minimise patient risk, optimise quality of life, and limit healthcare costs. This study involved a multi-site implementation of a validated model for conducting adult clinical swallowing assessments via telepractice and examined its service outcomes, costs and consumer satisfaction. METHODS: Five hub-spoke telepractice services, encompassing 18 facilities were established across a public health service. Service implementation support, including training of the telepractice speech pathologists (T-SP) and healthcare support workers in each site, was facilitated by an experienced project officer. New referrals from spoke sites were managed by the hub T-SP as per published protocols for dysphagia assessments via telepractice. Data was collected on existing service models prior to implementation, and then patient demographics, referral information, session outcomes, costs and patient and T-SP satisfaction when using telepractice. RESULTS: The first 50 sessions were analysed. Referrals were predominantly for inpatients at spoke sites. Telepractice assessments were completed successfully, with only minor technical issues. Changes to patient management (i.e. food/fluid changes post assessment) to optimise safety or progress oral intake, was required for 64% of patients. Service and cost efficiencies were achieved with an average 2-day reduction in waiting time and an average cost benefit of $218 per session when using the telepractice service over standard care. High clinician and patient satisfaction was reported. CONCLUSION: Telepractice services were successfully introduced across multiple sites, and achieved service and cost benefits with high consumer satisfaction.
Authors: Anna Miles; Nadine P Connor; Rinki Varindani Desai; Sudarshan Jadcherla; Jacqui Allen; Martin Brodsky; Kendrea L Garand; Georgia A Malandraki; Timothy M McCulloch; Marc Moss; Joseph Murray; Michael Pulia; Luis F Riquelme; Susan E Langmore Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 3.438