M-E Fernández-Montolí1, S Tous2,3, G Medina1, M Castellarnau1,4, A García-Tejedor1, S de Sanjosé2,5. 1. Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain. 4. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital General de L'Hospitalet, Consorci Sanitari Integral, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 5. CIBER Epidemiologíay Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term risk factors predicting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) and time to recurrence after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Colposcopy clinic. POPULATION: 242 women with CIN 2-3 treated between 1996 and 2006 and followed up until June 2016. METHODS: Age, margins, and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard and unconditional logistic regression models. The cumulative probability of treatment failure was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Histologically confirmed CIN 2-3, HR-HPV, margins, age. RESULTS: CIN 2-3 was associated with HR-HPV (HR = 30.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.80-246.20), age >35 years (HR = 5.53, 95% CI = 1.22-25.13), and margins (HR = 7.31, 95% CI = 1.60-33.44). HR-HPV showed a sensitivity of 88.8% and a specificity of 80%. Ecto+ /endocervical+ (16.7%), uncertain (19.4%) and ecto- /endocervical+ margins (9.1%) showed a higher risk of recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 13.20, 95% CI = 1.02-170.96; OR = 15.84, 95% CI = 3.02-83.01; and OR = 6.60, 95% CI = 0.88-49.53, respectively). Women with involved margins and/or who were HR-HPV positive had more treatment failure than those who were HR-HPV negative or had clear margins (P-log-rank <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HR-HPV and margins seem essential for stratifying post-LLETZ risk, and enable personalised management. Given that clear margins present a lower risk, a large excision may be indicated in older women to reduce the risk. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: After LLETZ for CIN 2-3, recurrences appear more often in women with positive HR-HPV and involved margins and aged over 35.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term risk factors predicting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) and time to recurrence after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Colposcopy clinic. POPULATION: 242 women with CIN 2-3 treated between 1996 and 2006 and followed up until June 2016. METHODS: Age, margins, and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard and unconditional logistic regression models. The cumulative probability of treatment failure was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Histologically confirmed CIN 2-3, HR-HPV, margins, age. RESULTS:CIN 2-3 was associated with HR-HPV (HR = 30.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.80-246.20), age >35 years (HR = 5.53, 95% CI = 1.22-25.13), and margins (HR = 7.31, 95% CI = 1.60-33.44). HR-HPV showed a sensitivity of 88.8% and a specificity of 80%. Ecto+ /endocervical+ (16.7%), uncertain (19.4%) and ecto- /endocervical+ margins (9.1%) showed a higher risk of recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 13.20, 95% CI = 1.02-170.96; OR = 15.84, 95% CI = 3.02-83.01; and OR = 6.60, 95% CI = 0.88-49.53, respectively). Women with involved margins and/or who were HR-HPV positive had more treatment failure than those who were HR-HPV negative or had clear margins (P-log-rank <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HR-HPV and margins seem essential for stratifying post-LLETZ risk, and enable personalised management. Given that clear margins present a lower risk, a large excision may be indicated in older women to reduce the risk. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: After LLETZ for CIN 2-3, recurrences appear more often in women with positive HR-HPV and involved margins and aged over 35.
Authors: Mariana K Bonas; Michelle G Discacciati; Hisa M Videira; Lucas A Cavalcante; Julio C Teixeira; Diama B Vale Journal: Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) Date: 2022-06-22
Authors: Annu Heinonen; Maija Jakobsson; Mari Kiviharju; Seppo Virtanen; Karoliina Aro; Maria Kyrgiou; Pekka Nieminen; Ilkka Kalliala Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 6.639