Literature DB >> 31631180

Late anastomotic leakages in rectal surgery: a wake-up call about their impact on long-term results.

Carlos Placer1, Juan Vega2, Ignacio Aguirre1, Steffen Rose1, Yolanda Saralegui1, José M Enríquez-Navascués1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the incidence of late anastomotic dehiscences, defined as those occurring after the 60th post-operative day, in the final results of rectal cancer treatment.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed reviewing all anastomotic leakages (AL) recorded in a prospective rectal cancer database, from November 2006 to December 2015.
RESULTS: The analysis included 395 (71.5%) colo-rectal anastomosis performed in 552 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Overall 32 (8.1%). AL were identified: 25 (78%) early and 7 (22%) late. Late AL compared to early AL were significantly associated with: higher ASA score (p = 0.021), higher CLS score (p = 0.005), lower rectal tumours (p = 0.014), neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy (p = 0.028), presence of ileostomy (p = 0.013), early hospital discharge (p = 0.048) and with the need for definitive stoma creation (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Late AL can represent up to 22% of all AL; with significant long-term implications such as an increase of the requirement of definitive stoma or chronic pelvic sepsis. This findings could modify the long-term outcomes in rectal cancer published. In our experience, the late AL do not represent a distinct clinical process compared to early forms, with exception of the chronological criteria. Copyright:
© 2019 Permanyer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoma de recto; Dehiscencia anastomótica sintomática; Dehiscencia precoz; Dehiscencia tardía; Early anastomotic leakage; Late anastomotic leakage; Rectal cancer; Symptomatic anastomotic leakage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31631180     DOI: 10.24875/CIRU.19000531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Cir        ISSN: 0009-7411            Impact factor:   0.361


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Chronic anastomotic leak after low rectal resection-an unsolved problem?]

Authors:  Peter Kienle; Jörn Richard Magdeburg
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Letter to the editor regarding "Late anastomotic leakage after anal sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: is it different from early anastomotic leakage?"

Authors:  Carlos Placer-Galán; Ignacio Aguirre-Allende; Jose Maria Enriquez-Navasues
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Early postoperative endoscopic evaluation of rectal anastomoses: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Steffen Axt; Kristin Haller; Peter Wilhelm; Claudius Falch; Peter Martus; Jonas Johannink; Jens Rolinger; Christian Beltzer; Lena Axt; Alfred Königsrainer; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.