| Literature DB >> 31631039 |
Jeremy M Schraw1, Jacob J Junco2, Austin L Brown2, Michael E Scheurer3, Karen R Rabin2, Philip J Lupo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: End-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) is the strongest predictor of relapse in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), but an understanding of the biological pathways underlying early treatment response remains elusive. We hypothesized that metabolomic profiling of diagnostic bone marrow plasma could provide insights into the underlying biology of early treatment response and inform treatment strategies for high-risk patients.Entities:
Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; Epidemiology; Minimal residual disease; NAMPT; NAMPT inhibitors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31631039 PMCID: PMC6838385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.09.033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EBioMedicine ISSN: 2352-3964 Impact factor: 8.143
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study sample by cohort.
| Discovery partition | Replication partition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRD <0.01% ( | MRD ≥0.01% ( | MRD <0.01% ( | MRD ≥0.01% ( | |||
| Sex, | 0.57 | 0.05 | ||||
| Male | 33 (58.9) | 24 (64.9) | 19 (48.7) | 17 (73.9) | ||
| Female | 23 (41.1) | 13 (35.1) | 20 (51.3) | 6 (26.1) | ||
| Age [years], median (IQR) | 5.3 (5.6) | 8.7 (8.7) | 0.08 | 6.4 (9.4) | 5.8 (6.7) | 0.25 |
| Race-ethnicity, | 0.17 | 0.18 | ||||
| NHW | 19 (33.9) | 7 (18.9) | 14 (35.9) | 5 (21.7) | ||
| Hispanic | 30 (53.6) | 27 (73.0) | 24 (61.5) | 15 (65.2) | ||
| Other non-Hispanic | 7 (12.5) | 3 (8.1) | 1 (2.6) | 3 (13.0) | ||
| BMI category | 0.19 | 0.76 | ||||
| Normal weight | 44 (81.5) | 25 (69.4) | 27 (71.1) | 14 (63.6) | ||
| Overweight or obese | 10 (18.5) | 11 (30.6) | 11 (28.9) | 8 (36.4) | ||
| NCI risk status | <0.001 | 0.84 | ||||
| Standard risk | 41 (73.2) | 13 (35.1) | 21 (53.8) | 13 (56.5) | ||
| High risk | 15 (26.8) | 24 (64.9) | 18 (46.2) | 10 (43.5) | ||
| Immunophenotype, N (%) | 0.31 | 0.03 | ||||
| B-lineage | 52 (92.9) | 32 (86.5) | 39 (100.0) | 19 (82.6) | ||
| T-lineage | 4 (7.1) | 5 (13.5) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (17.4) | ||
| Cytogenetics | 0.08 | 0.45 | ||||
| Favorable or neutral | 51 (91.1) | 29 (78.4) | 33 (84.6) | 21 (91.3) | ||
| Unfavorable | 5 (8.9) | 8 (21.6) | 6 (15.4) | 2 (8.7) | ||
Abbreviations. MRD, minimal residual disease; NHW, non-Hispanic white; BMI, body mass index.
All p-values for categorical values from χ2 test. p-value for age at diagnosis from Kruskal-Wallis test.
Overweight defined as age- and sex-adjusted BMI ≥ 85th percentile. Obese defined as age- and sex-adjusted BMI ≥95th percentile. Not computed for children <2 years of age.
High risk defined as presenting white blood cell count >50,000 cells/µL and/or age at diagnosis ≥10 years.
Unfavorable cytogenetics defined as presence of BCR-ABL1, KMT2A rearrangement, hypodiploidy (<44 chromosomes), or iAMP21 at diagnosis.
Fig. 1Univariate associations between metabolite abundances and end-induction MRD. X-axis shows log2-scale mean fold-change in MRD-positive compared to MRD-negative children in the discovery partition while y-axis indicates statistical significance. The dashed vertical line corresponds to no difference in mean abundance by MRD status. The dashed horizontal line represent the pre-defined threshold for statistical significance in the discovery partition of p < 0.001.
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering based on MRD-associated metabolites and pathways in the combined discovery and replication cohorts identifies two groups of patients with differential rates of MRD positivity. Patients shown in columns and metabolites in rows. Top: horizontal grey bars and cluster dendrogram indicating cluster membership. Right: Shading indicates metabolite abundance in each sample relative to the overall mean; darker colors represent greater relative abundance. Extreme values (>10-fold increase) are suppressed for visualization purposes. Bottom: patient's MRD status, immunophenotype (B: B-lineage; T: T-lineage), cytogenetic findings (F: favourable/neutral; U: unfavourable), NCI risk group (S: standard risk; H: high risk), and ethnicity (H: Hispanic; N: Non-Hispanic).
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample according to cluster.
| Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Sex, | 0.68 | ||
| Male | 57 (58.8) | 36 (62.1) | |
| Female | 40 (41.2) | 22 (37.9) | |
| Age [years], median (IQR) | 6.5 (8.3) | 6.2 (6.5) | |
| Race-ethnicity, | 0.55 | ||
| NHW | 31 (32.0) | 14 (24.1) | |
| Hispanic | 57 (58.8) | 39 (67.2) | |
| Other non-Hispanic | 9 (9.3) | 5 (8.6) | |
| BMI category | 0.90 | ||
| Normal weight | 70 (73.7) | 40 (72.7) | |
| Overweight or obese | 25 (26.3) | 15 (27.3) | |
| NCI risk status | 0.14 | ||
| Standard risk | 60 (61.9) | 28 (48.3) | |
| High risk | 37 (38.1) | 30 (51.7) | |
| Immunophenotype, | 0.33 | ||
| B-lineage | 91 (93.8) | 51 (87.9) | |
| T-lineage | 7 (12.1) | 6 (6.2) | |
| Cytogenetics | 0.20 | ||
| Favorable or neutral | 87 (89.7) | 47 (81.0) | |
| Unfavorable | 10 (10.3) | 11 (19.0) | |
| MRD status, | 0.001 | ||
| Negative | 70 (72.2) | 25 (43.1) | |
| Positive | 27 (27.8) | 33 (56.9) | |
| Early relapse | 24 (26.1) | 14 (25.5) | 0.93 |
Abbreviations: NHW, non-Hispanic white; BMI, body mass index. MRD, minimal residual disease.
All p-values for categorical values from χ2 test. p-value for age at diagnosis from Kruskal–Wallis test.
Overweight defined as age- and sex-adjusted BMI ≥85th percentile. Obese defined as age- and sex-adjusted BMI ≥95th percentile. Not computed for children <2 years of age.
High risk defined as presenting white blood cell count >50,000 cells/µL and/or age at diagnosis ≥10 years.
Unfavorable cytogenetics defined as presence of BCR-ABL1, KMT2A rearrangement, hypodiploidy (<44 chromosomes), or iAMP21 at diagnosis.
Evaluable in 92 patients in Cluster 1 and 55 patients in Cluster 2.
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristics curves showing sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for predicting end-induction MRD in the clinical and combined models. In red, a clinical model incorporating immunophenotype, NCI risk status, and cytogenetics (favourable/neutral vs. unfavourable); in blue, a model additionally incorporating cluster membership. Models were computed in the combined population of N = 155 patients from the discovery and replication cohorts.
Fig. 4NAMPT inhibitors demonstrate potent in vitro cytotoxicity in ALL cell lines through NAD+ depletion. (a) Mean percentage (plus or minus standard deviation) of viable cells for 7 B-ALL and 3 T-ALL cell lines incubated for 96 h with each of three NAMPT inhibitors. (b) IC50s (nM) as calculated from data shown in (a). FK866 was the most cytotoxic in the 8 cell lines sensitive to NAMPT inhibition, followed by STF 118804 and GPP 78. T-ALL cell lines CCRF-CEM and HSB-2 were most resistant to each NAMPT inhibitor. (c) Mean percentage (plus or minus standard deviation) of viable cells in the NALM6 (left) and JM1 (right) cell lines when pre-treated with water or 100 µM NAD+, and then incubated for 96 h with indicated agents. NAD+ supplementation prevented apoptosis for all tested doses of NAMPT inhibitors, but not for doxorubicin (DOX) or etoposide (VP-16). Results represent the average of at least four biological replicates across two independent experiments. Differences between groups were calculated with two-way ANOVA and Sidak's multiple comparisons test (*p < 0•05, **p < 0•0001).
Fig. 5NAMPT inhibitors demonstrate potent in vitro cytotoxicity in cells from ALL patient-derived xenografts through NAD+ depletion. (a) Viability curves. Samples were incubated for 48 h with each of three NAMPT inhibitors or doxorubicin (DOX), then analysed for viability by ATP assay. Each data point represents the mean and standard deviation of three technical replicates. (b) Summary of IC50 values. FK866 demonstrated the lowest IC50 in all five samples. Effects of NAD pre-treatment on (c) apoptosis. Patient samples 22763, 2003, 1995, or 105127-R were pre-treated with water or 100 µM NAD+ for one hour, then incubated with FK866 or DOX for 72 h for Annexin V/PI analysis. NAD+ completely prevented increases in mean (plus or minus standard deviation) apoptosis in FK866- but not DOX-treated patient samples. Experiments were performed with triplicate wells. Differences between groups were calculated with two-way ANOVA and Side's multiple comparisons test (*p < 0•05, **p < 0•001).