Nicholas Roberts1, Spencer James1, Meghan Delaney2, Christina Fitzmaurice3. 1. Department of Health Metric Sciences, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, GeOrge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 3. Department of Health Metric Sciences, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: cf11@uw.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are an important resource of every health-care system, with often limited supply in low-income and middle-income countries; however, the degree of unmet need for blood transfusions is often unknown. We therefore aimed to estimate the blood transfusion need and supply at national level to determine gaps in transfusion services globally. METHODS: We did a modelling study involving 195 countries and territories. We used blood component preparation data from 2011-13 to estimate blood availability for 180 (92%) of 195 countries from the WHO Global Status Report on Blood Safety and Availability. We calculated disease-specific transfusion needs per prevalent case for 20 causes in the USA using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample dataset between the years 2000 and 2014, and the State Inpatient Databases between 2003 and 2007 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Using prevalence estimates for the USA from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study, we estimated the ideal disease specific-transfusion rate as the lowest rate from the years 2000 to 2014. We applied this rate to GBD prevalence results for 195 countries to estimate transfusion needs. Unmet need was the difference between the estimated supply and need. FINDINGS: In 2017, the global blood need was 304 711 244 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 293 064 637-314 049 479) and the global blood supply was 272 270 243 (268 002 639-276 698 494) blood product units, with a need-to-supply ratio of 1·12 (95% UI 1·07-1·16). Of the 195 countries, 119 (61%) did not have sufficient blood supply to meet their need. Across these 119 countries, the unmet need totalled 102 359 632 (95% UI 93 381 710-111 360 725) blood product units, equal to 1849 (1687-2011) units per 100 000 population globally. Every country in central, eastern, and western sub-Saharan Africa, Oceania, and south Asia had insufficient blood to meet their needs. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that the gap between need and supply is large in many low-income and middle-income countries, and reinforce that the WHO target of 10-20 donations per 1000 population is an underestimate for many countries. A continuous expansion and optimisation of national transfusion services and implementation of evidence-based strategies for blood availability is needed globally, as is more government support, financially, structurally, and through establishment of a regulatory oversight to ensure supply, quality, and safety in low-income and middle-income countries. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are an important resource of every health-care system, with often limited supply in low-income and middle-income countries; however, the degree of unmet need for blood transfusions is often unknown. We therefore aimed to estimate the blood transfusion need and supply at national level to determine gaps in transfusion services globally. METHODS: We did a modelling study involving 195 countries and territories. We used blood component preparation data from 2011-13 to estimate blood availability for 180 (92%) of 195 countries from the WHO Global Status Report on Blood Safety and Availability. We calculated disease-specific transfusion needs per prevalent case for 20 causes in the USA using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample dataset between the years 2000 and 2014, and the State Inpatient Databases between 2003 and 2007 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Using prevalence estimates for the USA from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study, we estimated the ideal disease specific-transfusion rate as the lowest rate from the years 2000 to 2014. We applied this rate to GBD prevalence results for 195 countries to estimate transfusion needs. Unmet need was the difference between the estimated supply and need. FINDINGS: In 2017, the global blood need was 304 711 244 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 293 064 637-314 049 479) and the global blood supply was 272 270 243 (268 002 639-276 698 494) blood product units, with a need-to-supply ratio of 1·12 (95% UI 1·07-1·16). Of the 195 countries, 119 (61%) did not have sufficient blood supply to meet their need. Across these 119 countries, the unmet need totalled 102 359 632 (95% UI 93 381 710-111 360 725) blood product units, equal to 1849 (1687-2011) units per 100 000 population globally. Every country in central, eastern, and western sub-Saharan Africa, Oceania, and south Asia had insufficient blood to meet their needs. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that the gap between need and supply is large in many low-income and middle-income countries, and reinforce that the WHO target of 10-20 donations per 1000 population is an underestimate for many countries. A continuous expansion and optimisation of national transfusion services and implementation of evidence-based strategies for blood availability is needed globally, as is more government support, financially, structurally, and through establishment of a regulatory oversight to ensure supply, quality, and safety in low-income and middle-income countries. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Ujjal Didar Singh Sekhon; Kelsey Swingle; Aditya Girish; Norman Luc; Maria de la Fuente; Jurgis Alvikas; Shannon Haldeman; Adnan Hassoune; Kaisal Shah; Youjoung Kim; Steven Eppell; Jeffrey Capadona; Andrew Shoffstall; Matthew D Neal; Wei Li; Marvin Nieman; Anirban Sen Gupta Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 19.319
Authors: Fernanda G M D Estrada; Claudia D L Oliveira; Ester C Sabino; Brian Custer; Thelma T Gonçalez; Edward L Murphy; Dahra Teles; Alfredo Mendrone-Junior; Steve S Witkin; Cesar de Almeida-Neto Journal: Transfus Med Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 2.019