Xiaoli Han1, Qinyue Chen1, Yali Sun1, Limei Han1, Xianyi Sha1. 1. Center for Medical Research and Innovation, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Center, Key Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery, Ministry of Education, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the morphology, loadability, and releasing profiles of CalliSpheres microspheres in delivering oxaliplatin. METHODS: Varied amount (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg oxaliplatin) and concentration (1.25, 2.5, 5.0 mg/mL oxaliplatin) of oxaliplatin were mixed with CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) to measure the loadability. Of all, 20 mg oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes was prepared to measure the releasing profiles, meanwhile, fetal bovine serum was added to determine the effect of serum on oxaliplatin releasing. The morphology and size distribution of CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes before and after 20 mg oxaliplatin loading were detected. RESULTS: Oxaliplatin amount was negatively correlated with loading efficiency with highest loadability in 20 mg oxaliplatin group (maximum 40% in 50-100 µm CalliSpheres microspheres, 52% in 100-300 µm CalliSpheres microspheres, and 52% in 300-500 µm CalliSpheres microspheres), while oxaliplatin concentration was positively associated with loading efficiency. Similar drug-releasing profiles were observed among oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes, and a rapid drug release was discovered in CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes as well. We also found that fetal bovine serum did not affect the drug-releasing profiles of oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres. In addition, CalliSpheres microspheres was modified a little to ellipse shape and less smooth after oxaliplatin loading, and it was enlarged to some extent. CONCLUSION: This study discloses drug loadability, releasing profiles, and morphology change of CalliSpheres microspheres for delivering oxaliplatin, which provides potential evidences for application of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting beads in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the morphology, loadability, and releasing profiles of CalliSpheres microspheres in delivering oxaliplatin. METHODS: Varied amount (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg oxaliplatin) and concentration (1.25, 2.5, 5.0 mg/mL oxaliplatin) of oxaliplatin were mixed with CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) to measure the loadability. Of all, 20 mg oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes was prepared to measure the releasing profiles, meanwhile, fetal bovine serum was added to determine the effect of serum on oxaliplatin releasing. The morphology and size distribution of CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes before and after 20 mg oxaliplatin loading were detected. RESULTS:Oxaliplatin amount was negatively correlated with loading efficiency with highest loadability in 20 mg oxaliplatin group (maximum 40% in 50-100 µm CalliSpheres microspheres, 52% in 100-300 µm CalliSpheres microspheres, and 52% in 300-500 µm CalliSpheres microspheres), while oxaliplatin concentration was positively associated with loading efficiency. Similar drug-releasing profiles were observed among oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes, and a rapid drug release was discovered in CalliSpheres microspheres with 3 sizes as well. We also found that fetal bovine serum did not affect the drug-releasing profiles of oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres microspheres. In addition, CalliSpheres microspheres was modified a little to ellipse shape and less smooth after oxaliplatin loading, and it was enlarged to some extent. CONCLUSION: This study discloses drug loadability, releasing profiles, and morphology change of CalliSpheres microspheres for delivering oxaliplatin, which provides potential evidences for application of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting beads in clinical practice.
Oxaliplatin, as the third generation of platinum anticancer drugs, presents with excellent
inhibitive effect on cancers featured by broad antitumor spectra, strong killing ability
toward drug-resistant tumor strains and so on.[1-3] Benefiting from the advantages of oxaliplatin, it has been widely applied for cancer
treatment in clinical practice such as the therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer, while
its neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity due to high blood concentration still concern the
physicians a lot.[4-7] Therefore, it is essential to explore the methods to reduce these toxicities and
increase the tumor concentration of oxaliplatin.Along with the great improvement in biotechnology and novel materials investigation,
several drug-eluting beads (DEBs) including DC beads, LC beads, HepaSphere microspheres
(HSM), and CalliSpheres microspheres (CSM) have been produced to sustain high concentration
of anticancer drug in target tumor and decrease the systemic toxicity, meanwhile they
embolize the tumor supply vessel to make tumor necrosis, which greatly improve the efficacy
and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).[8-13] Among these beads, CSM is the first DEBs developed in China that illuminate good
biocompatibility, suspension property, and flexibility, and it has been proved to possess
satisfied loading and releasing profiles of doxorubicin.[11,14,15] Considering the aforementioned features of CSM, we hypothesized that the application
of CSM in loading and releasing oxaliplatin would reveal approving outcomes, while no
related investigation has been disclosed. Thus, this current study aimed to explore the
morphology, loadability, and releasing profiles of CSM in delivering oxaliplatin, which
would provide evidence for the potential application of TACE with CSM-eluting oxaliplatin in
treating cancers.
Materials and Methods
Materials Preparation
Oxaliplatin was purchased from Meilune Biological Technology Co (Dalian, China).
CalliSpheres microspheres (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) were kindly given from
Suzhou Callisyn Biomedical, Inc (Suzhou, China). Sterile water for injection was obtained
from KeLun Industry Group (Sichuan, China). Methanol was purchased from Tedia Company Inc
(Fairfield, Connecticut). Deionized water was obtained from a Millipore Simplicity TM
system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
Preparation of Calibration Standard
The standard stock solution of 5 mg/mL oxaliplatin was prepared by dissolving oxaliplatin
powder in sterile water and then stored at 4°C. The stock solution of oxaliplatin was
further diluted with sterile water to prepare the calibration curves at the desired
concentrations at 4, 6, 10, 15, 30, 60, 80, and 120 μg/mL.
Measurement of Oxaliplatin Loading Efficiency by CSM
Of all, 50-mg CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) was used for
evaluation of oxaliplatin-loading efficiency, and 4, 8, 12, and 16 mL of 5 mg/mL
oxaliplatin stock solution was prepared for detection of oxaliplatin loading efficiency of
different doses (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg). CalliSpheres microspheres and oxaliplatin
solution were mixed followed by agitation using Orbital Shaker (TS-1,Shanghai, China) at
room temperature. Then, 20-uL upper solution was pipetted to a 1.5-mL polypropylene tube
at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 minutes for each sample and centrifuged at
9000g for 3 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, 10 uL clear
supernatant was obtained and mixed with 240 μL 10% methanol (vol/vol) in 1.5 mL
polypropylene tubes as test sample. Finally, in order to determine oxaliplatin loading
efficiency of CSM, these samples were analyzed by measuring the residual unloaded drug in
the supernatant using Agilent 1260 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Agilent
Technologies Co, Santa Clara, CA ,USA). In addition, 40 mg oxaliplatin with different
concentrations (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL) were also prepared for evaluation of oxaliplatin
loading efficiency of CSM with varied concentrations. Besides, since CSM is a marketed
microsphere in China, the stirring time and stirring temperature are recommended by the
manufacturer (Suzhou Callisyn Biomedical, Inc, Suzhou, China) based on their
investigations and clinical use. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Drug Loading Stability
For evaluating the stability of CSM, 3 replicates of 50 mg CSM at 100 to 300 µm were
loaded with 20 mg oxaliplatin solution and were diluted at a ratio of 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8,
respectively, while each replicate was divided into 4 groups and each group was diluted
with sterile water, 0.9% saline solution, 5% glucose solution, and contrast agent ioversol
injection, respectively. Later, the oxaliplatin-eluting CMS were placed at room
temperature, and the concentrations of per sample were quantified at 60 minutes by the
HPLC method as described before.
Measurement of Oxaliplatin-Releasing Profiles by CSM
In order to measure the oxaliplatin-releasing profiles by CSM, CSM with 3 sizes (50-150
μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) which were loaded with 20 mg oxaliplatin were placed in
500 mL 0.9% saline solution at 37°C with a flow of 5 mL/min in the pharmacopeia
flow-through apparatus 4 Sotax system (Sotax CE6, Switzerland). Then 1 mL sample was
collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 hours for each sample, and centrifuged at 10
000g for 5 minutes at room temperature. Meanwhile, after sample
collection, an equal volume of 0.9% saline solution was replenished. Subsequently, the
concentration of oxaliplatin in each sample was determined using Agilent 1260 HPLC
(Agilent Technologies Co) and accumulating releasing rate of oxaliplatin was calculated.
In addition, 100 to 300 µm CSM loaded with 20 mg oxaliplatin were incubated in 500 mL 0.9%
saline solution mixed with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to determine the effect of serum
on oxaliplatin releasing profiles. Besides, since the releasing profiles were similar
among CSM with different sizes, and 100 to 300 µm CSM was most commonly used in clinical
practice, thus only 100 to 300 µm CSM group was investigated to study the effect of serum
on oxaliplatin releasing profile. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate.
Morphology of CSM Before and After Oxaliplatin Loading
The morphology and size distribution of CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and
300-500 μm) before and after 20 mg oxaliplatin loading were detected by scanning electron
microscopic imaging (Hitachi S 2460N, JEOL, Japan) and laser diffraction particle size
analyzer (Mastersizer 3000, Malvern Panalytical Ltd, United Kingdom) respectively. All
experiments were conducted in triplicate.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis
An Agilent 1260 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies Co) consisting of a G1311B quaternary
pump, a G1316A thermostated column oven, a G1329B autosampler, and a G4212B diode array
detector was employed. The analyte was conducted on Eclipse PlusC18 (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 150
mm, Agilent) at 40°C. The methanol and distillation-distillation H2O were used
as the mobile phase. The isocratic elution mode of 10% methanol (vol/vol) and a flow rate
of 1 mL/min were employed. The temperature of autosampler was maintained at 4°C, the
injection volume was 5 μL for each sample, the chromatographic run time was within 8.0
minutes, and the detection wavelength of oxaliplatin was 250 nm.
Effect of Oxaliplatin-Eluting CSM on Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells
Humancolorectal cancer cell lines SW620 and HT29 were purchased from Leibniz Institute
DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, German) and were
cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle medium (Invitrogen,Carlsbad, California, USA)
supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Carlsbad, California, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin (North
China Pharmaceuticals Co, Ltd, China), and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (North China
Pharmaceuticals Co, Ltd, China) at 37°C in a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2. A
total of 200 μL medium containing 0 μM oxaliplatin solution (blank control group), 0.5 μM
oxaliplatin solution (oxaliplatin group), or 0.5 μM oxaliplatin-eluting CSM
(oxaliplatin-eluting CSM group) were added to treat SW620 and HT29 for 72 hours, and cell
proliferation was detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto-ken, Japan) at 0
hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 96 hours according to the instruction of
manufacturer.
Statistics
Data were mainly presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared by
t test or one-way ANOVA test. Data processing and analysis were
performed using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM, USA). P < .05 was considered
as significant.
Results
Effect of Oxaliplatin Amount on Drug-Loading Efficiency of CSM
Multiple group comparison analysis revealed that oxaliplatin-loading efficiency was
different among 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg oxaliplatin groups in 50 to 100 µm CSM
(Figure 1A), 100 to 300 µm CSM
(Figure 1B), and 300 to 500 µm
CSM (Figure 1C), and the curves
disclosed that oxaliplatin amount was negatively correlated with loading efficiency with
highest loadability in 20 mg oxaliplatin group (maximum 40% in 50- to 100-µm CSM, 52% in
100- to 300-µm CSM, and 52% in 300-500 µm CSM). In addition, time to maximal loading was
approximately 60 minutes in 50 to 150 µm CSM and 100 to 300 µm CSM, and 20 minutes in 300
to 500 µm CSM for all doses of oxaliplatin.
Figure 1.
A-C showed the effect of different oxaliplatin amount on loading efficiency of CSM
with size 50 to 150 μm, 100 to 300 μm, and 300 to 500 μm, respectively; D-F showed the
effect of different oxaliplatin concentration on loading efficiency of CSM with size
50 to 150 μm, 100 to 300 μm, and 300 to 500 μm, respectively. CSM indicates
CalliSpheres microspheres.
A-C showed the effect of different oxaliplatin amount on loading efficiency of CSM
with size 50 to 150 μm, 100 to 300 μm, and 300 to 500 μm, respectively; D-F showed the
effect of different oxaliplatin concentration on loading efficiency of CSM with size
50 to 150 μm, 100 to 300 μm, and 300 to 500 μm, respectively. CSM indicates
CalliSpheres microspheres.
Effect of Oxaliplatin Concentration on Drug-Loading Efficiency of CSM
Multiple group comparison analysis illuminated that oxaliplatin loading efficiency was
differed among 1.25 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL oxaliplatin groups in 50 to 100 µm CSM
(Figure 1D), 100 to 300 µm CSM
(Figure 1E), and 300 to 500 µm
CSM (Figure 1F), and the curves
disclosed that oxaliplatin concentration was positively associated with loading efficiency
with highest loadability in 5 mg/mL oxaliplatin group (maximum 26% in 50-100 µm CSM, 27%
in 100-300 µm CSM, and 34% in 300-500 µm CSM). In addition, time to maximal loading was
approximately 20 minutes in 50 to 150 µm CSM, 15 minutes in 100 to 300 µm CSM, and 20
minutes in 300 to 500 µm CSM for all concentrations of oxaliplatin.
Loading Stability of CSM
No difference in loading efficiency of 20 mg oxaliplatin with 100 to 300 µm CSM among
different mediums or different volumes of the same medium was discovered (Supplementary
Figure 1), indicating good stability of CSM.
Drug-Releasing Profiles of Oxaliplatin-Loaded CSM
Since 20 mg oxaliplatin presented with the highest loading efficiency, 20 mg
oxaliplatin-loaded CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) was prepared
for drug-releasing profiles measurement. Similar drug-releasing profiles were observed
among oxaliplatin-loaded CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm; Figure 2A). And a rapid drug release
was discovered in CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm). In addition,
we found that FBS did not affect the drug-releasing profiles of oxaliplatin-loaded CSM
(Figure 2B).
Figure 2.
A, The releasing profile of 20 mg oxaliplatin-loaded CSM with size 50 to 150 μm, 100
to 300 μm, and 300 to 500 μm. B, The effect of FBS on releasing profiles of
oxaliplatin-loaded CSM. CSM indicates CalliSphere microspheres; FBS, fetal bovine
serum.
A, The releasing profile of 20 mg oxaliplatin-loaded CSM with size 50 to 150 μm, 100
to 300 μm, and 300 to 500 μm. B, The effect of FBS on releasing profiles of
oxaliplatin-loaded CSM. CSM indicates CalliSphere microspheres; FBS, fetal bovine
serum.A total of 20 mg oxaliplatin-loaded CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500
μm) was prepared for morphology detection, which disclosed that the CSM was round and
smooth before oxaliplatin loading, and it was modified a little to ellipse shape and less
smooth after oxaliplatin loading (Figure
3). In addition, the mean particle size of CSM was enlarged by 1.7% in 50 to 150
µm CSM, 2.7% in 100 to 300 µm CSM, and 28.1% in 300 to 500 µm after 20 mg oxaliplatin
loading (Table 1).
Figure 3.
Morphology of CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) before and
after 20 mg oxaliplatin loading. CSM indicates CalliSphere microspheres.
Table 1.
Diameters of Unloaded and Oxaliplatin-Loaded CalliSpheres.
Size of CalliSpheres
Mean Diameters (μm)
Increase Ratio (%)
Unloaded
20 mg Oxaliplatin Loaded
50-150 μm
119 ± 2
121 ± 7
1.7 ± 4.2
100-300 μm
257 ± 3
264 ± 10
2.7 ± 2.7
300-500 μm
481 ± 4
616 ± 25
28.1 ± 4.2
Morphology of CSM with 3 sizes (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) before and
after 20 mg oxaliplatin loading. CSM indicates CalliSphere microspheres.Diameters of Unloaded and Oxaliplatin-Loaded CalliSpheres.
Cytotoxicity of Oxaliplatin-Eluting CSM on Colorectal Cancer Cells
SW620 cell proliferation was similar at 0 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 96 hours, while
decreased at 72 hours in oxaliplatin-eluting CSM group compared to oxaliplatin group
(Figure 4A); HT29 cell
proliferation was similar at 0 hour, 24 hours, and 48 hours, while decreased at 72 hours
and 96 hours in oxaliplatin-eluting CSM group compared to oxaliplatin group (Figure 4B). These data indicated
oxaliplatin-eluting CSM increased the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer
cells to some extent.
Figure 4.
Effect of oxaliplatin-eluting CSM on colorectal cancer cells. Comparison of SW620
cell proliferation between oxaliplatin eluting CSM group and oxaliplatin group (A);
comparison of HT29 cell proliferation between oxaliplatin eluting CSM group and
oxaliplatin group (B). Comparison was determined by t test. CSM
indicates CalliSphere microspheres.
Effect of oxaliplatin-eluting CSM on colorectal cancer cells. Comparison of SW620
cell proliferation between oxaliplatin eluting CSM group and oxaliplatin group (A);
comparison of HT29 cell proliferation between oxaliplatin eluting CSM group and
oxaliplatin group (B). Comparison was determined by t test. CSM
indicates CalliSphere microspheres.
Discussion
In this present study, we showed the oxaliplatin loading efficiency and releasing profiles
of CSM with different sizes and further observed that oxaliplatin amount negatively while
concentration positively correlated with loadability. Besides, oxaliplatin-eluting CSM
increased the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells to some extent.In recent years, chemotherapy system with targeted and controlled release form has been
widely explored to increase the drug concentration in target tumor while decrease the
systemic drug-related toxicity in various cancers.[8,16,17] In brief, the procedures of these methods are as follow: (1) Chemotherapy drugs are
loaded by the carriers through binding (including physical adsorption, ionic bonding, and
covalent bonding), encapsulation and cross-linking,[9,10,16] (2) drug-loaded carriers are delivered to the tumor sites through implantation or injection.[17-19] Finally, benefiting from the controlled release effect of the carriers on
chemotherapy drugs, the elevated drug concentration in target tumor site and decreased drug
concentration in system is realized.[18,20,21] Meanwhile, novel biomaterials, which have been initiated in recent decades such as
nanogel, drug-eluting stent, DEB and so on, have been developed and improved in recent years
and have widely showed their potential in treating various diseases including cancers,
cardiovascular diseases, analgesia applications, and so on.[22-25] Among these approaches, DEB has shown its advantages in managing several cancers such
as HCC via reducing systemic toxicity and increasing in-tumor chemotherapy drugs
concentrations, and great efforts are still made to further improve the superiority of the
materials or structures to increase the efficacy and reduce the tolerance risks.[26-30] Among the types of carriers, DEB is widely accepted in clinical practice and several
brands of DEB have been produced in medical application including DC beads, LC beads, HSM,
and CSM, which are made of poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), or glucans.[12,13,31-34]A previous study illuminates that DC beads achieve 95% doxorubicin-loading efficiency and
HSM realizes 100% doxorubicin-loading efficiency, meanwhile, as to CSM, as the first DEB
developed in China which mainly made of PVA, is also observed to possess similar doxorubicin loadability.[11,18] However, the application of these DEBs in delivering oxaliplatin is very limited,
only 3 studies (1 for noncommercial use beads and 2 for HSM) have been reported.[35-37] In detail, a noncommercial use bead made of PLGA is applied to load oxaliplatin with
maximum loadability 14% to 31.5%,[35] and oxaliplatin-loaded HSM is introduced to treat patients with unresectable hepatic
tumors which discloses encouraging outcomes, while the loading profiles are not investigated.[36,37] Considering the satisfied manifestations of CSM in loading doxorubicin, we hypnotized
that it would present with good loadability of oxaliplatin as well. In this present study,
we observed that CSM with different sizes presented with good loading efficiency with
maximum loadability 40% to 52% when loading 20 mg oxaliplatin at 5 mg/mL concentration. The
possible mechanism of CSM for loading oxaliplatin might be as follows: As a PVC hydrogel
modified with sulfonate groups, CSM could load oxaliplatin via multiple ways such as direct
binding (including physical adsorption, ionic bonding, and covalent bonding), encapsulation
or cross-linking. Besides, the loading efficiency was numerically higher in our study
compared with previous report,[35] which might result from that the superior binding, encapsulation, or cross-linking
ability of CSM. Interesting, we firstly discovered that oxaliplatin amount negatively while
concentration positively correlated with loadability, this might result from that loading
burden was less when being loaded with lower amount oxaliplatin, while the contacting
surface area was larger when being loaded with higher concentration oxaliplatin.As to drug-releasing profiles, previous studies disclose that a very sustained releasing
profiles are realized by DC beads, HSM, and CSM after being loaded with doxorubicin,[11-13,18] while a very quick release is observed in DC beads, HSM after being loaded with irinotecan.[12,13] Regarding to releasing oxaliplatin, the investigation is indeed insufficient. Only
one report illustrates that a noncommercial use bead made of PLGA achieves sustained
oxaliplatin release within 1200 hours.[35] In addition, although another 2 reports reveal that oxaliplatin-loaded HSM presents
with satisfied efficacy in treating patients with hepatic tumor, the releasing profiles of
HSM for oxaliplatin is not explored.[36,37] In this present study, we observed that oxaliplatin release was very quick in all
sizes of CSM, this might result from that the binding or encapsulation soundness was less
between CSM and oxaliplatin compared to doxorubicin. These implied that the application of
oxaliplatin-loaded CSM for cancer treatment should be performed more frequently than
doxorubicin-loaded CSM to sustain satisfied outcomes. Furthermore, we also observed that FBS
had no effect on the releasing profiles of oxaliplatin-loaded CSM, which provides more
support for the application of oxaliplatin-loaded CSM in treating cancers. Most importantly,
the rapid release of oxaliplatin-eluting CSM in vitro indicates the
sustained release advantage of TACE with oxaliplatin-eluting CSM is insufficient, while TACE
with microspheres dose not only rely on the sustained releasing but also the targeted
releasing and embolization. Such as irinotecan-eluting microspheres, although exhibit rapid
release profile, is widely used to treat liver metastases of colorectal cancer.[38,39]As to morphology of DEB before and after drug loading, a previous study illuminates that DC
beads and HSM are both found to be less smooth and less regularly shaped after doxorubicin
or irinotecan loading, and they are shrunken after doxorubicin or irinotecan loading and
recovered to almost original sizes after elution.[12,40] While no report has been reported on the morphology of DEB before and after
oxaliplatin loading. In this study, we firstly discovered that CSM was modified a little to
ellipse shape and less smooth after oxaliplatin loading, and it was enlarged to some extent.
These might be explained by that binding or encapsulation soundness was less between CSM and
oxaliplatin, thus the gap between them was larger than original gap between water content
and CSM, thus after loading, the size was enlarged instead of shrunken.Notably, the microspheres reduce systemic toxicities via directly releasing the
chemotherapy drug to the target tumor (which reduce the concentration of chemotherapy in
non-lesion tissue) instead of via the blood circulation, thus an in vivo
investigation of tumor concentration and nontumor concentration with oxaliplatin-eluting CSM
is meaningful, while due to lack of foundation, only in vitro investigation
was performed.In conclusion, this study discloses drug loadability, releasing profiles, and morphology
change of CSM for delivering oxaliplatin, which provides potential evidences for application
of oxaliplatin-loaded DEB in clinical practice.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Figure_1_(revised) for Morphology, Loadability, and
Releasing Profiles of CalliSpheres Microspheres in Delivering Oxaliplatin: An In
Vitro Study by Xiaoli Han, Qinyue Chen, Yali Sun, Limei Han and Xianyi Sha in
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Authors: Julien Namur; Steven J Citron; Marty T Sellers; Mark H Dupuis; Michel Wassef; Michel Manfait; Alexandre Laurent Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Robert Martin; David Geller; Joseph Espat; David Kooby; Marty Sellars; Robert Goldstein; David Imagawa; Charles Scoggins Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2012 Jan-Feb