Literature DB >> 31629140

Long-term Outcomes After Intraprocedural Aneurysm Rupture During Coil Embolization of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Keitaro Yamagami1, Taketo Hatano2, Ichiro Nakahara3, Akira Ishii4, Mitsushige Ando2, Hideo Chihara2, Takenori Ogura2, Keita Suzuki2, Daisuke Kondo2, Takahiko Kamata2, Eiji Higashi2, Shota Sakai2, Hiroki Sakamoto2, Koji Iihara5, Izumi Nagata2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of patients with intraprocedural aneurysm rupture (IPR) during endovascular coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remain unclear. We investigated the long-term outcomes and predictors of neurological outcomes in patients who sustained IPR during coil embolization of UIAs.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical record of 312 untreated UIAs in 284 patients who underwent endovascular coiling between April 2013 and July 2018.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period for the entire cohort was 25.6 months. Twelve patients (3.8%) experienced IPR. The mean aneurysm size in the IPR cohort was significantly smaller than that in the no-IPR cohort (P = 0.045). The IPR cohort had a higher percentage of earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage from another aneurysm (P = 0.019), anterior communicating artery (AComA) aneurysm (P < 0.001), and basilar artery (BA) aneurysm (P = 0.022) than the no-IPR cohort. Neurologic deterioration was observed in 3 patients. The morbidity and mortality rates of the IPR cohort were 25% and 8.3%, respectively. Patients with IPR during coil embolization for AComA aneurysm did not develop neurological deterioration. Two of the 3 patients (66.7%) with a BA aneurysm had neurological deterioration. The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0-2 at the last follow-up did not differ between the 2 cohorts (P = 0.608).
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of functionally independent patients did not differ between patients with and without IPR. Patients with BA aneurysms who developed an IPR tended to exhibit more unfavorable clinical courses than patients with AcomA aneurysms.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coil embolization; Endovascular neurosurgery; Intraprocedural rupture; Long-term outcomes; Unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31629140     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  2 in total

1.  Aneurysm Perforation Due to Advancement of the Coil Delivery Wire During Stent-Assisted Embolization.

Authors:  Takuya Osuki; Hiroyuki Ikeda; Minami Uezato; Masanori Kinosada; Masaki Chin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-16

2.  Risk Factors for Recurrence of Intracranial Aneurysm After Coil Embolization: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ji Jin; Geng Guo; Yeqing Ren; Biao Yang; Yongqiang Wu; Shule Wang; Yanqi Sun; Xiaogang Wang; Yuxiao Wang; Jianzhong Zheng
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.086

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.