Literature DB >> 31629126

Synchronous versus Staged Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Patients with Concomitant Severe Coronary and Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Andreas Tzoumas1, Stefanos Giannopoulos2, Pavlos Texakalidis3, Nektarios Charisis4, Theofilos Machinis5, George J Koullias6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the systemic nature of atherosclerosis, arteries at different sites are commonly simultaneously affected. As a result, severe coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) frequently coexists with significant carotid stenosis that warrants revascularization. To compare simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG versus staged CEA and CABG for patients with concomitant CAD and carotid artery stenosis in terms of perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Eleven studies comprising 44,895 patients were included in this meta-analysis (21,710 in the synchronous group and 23,185 patients in the staged group). The synchronous CEA and CABG group had a statistically significant lower risk for myocardial infarction (MI) (odds ratio [OR] 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.61, I2 = 0%) and higher risk for stroke (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.34-1.71, I2 = 0%) and death (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75, I2 = 47.8%). Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00-1.61, I2 = 0.0%), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.22-3.05, I2 = 0.0%), and pulmonary complications (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.24-9.60, I2 = 67.5%) were similar between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the simultaneous CEA and CABG group had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality and stroke and lower risk for MI as compared to staged CEA and CABG group. The rates of TIA, postoperative bleeding, and pulmonary complications were similar between the 2 groups. Future randomized trials or prospective cohorts are needed to validate our results.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31629126     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jithendhar Kandimalla; Zain Hussain; Paisith Piriyawat; Gustavo Rodriguez; Alberto Maud; Rakesh Khatri; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Anantha R Vellipuram
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Carotid endarterectomy with concomitant distal endovascular intervention is associated with increased rates of stroke and death.

Authors:  Luke M Stewart; Emily L Spangler; Danielle C Sutzko; Benjamin J Pearce; Graeme E McFarland; Marc A Passman; Mark A Patterson; Zdenek Novak; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Safety of different carotid artery revascularization strategies in the coronary artery bypass graft population: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Shasha Jin; Changpo Lin; Jianfei Shen; Zhenghua Hong; Song Xue; Daqiao Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

4.  Effect of untreated carotid artery stenosis at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Nicholas R Hess; Arman Killic; Derek R Serna-Gallegos; Forozan Navid; Yisi Wang; Floyd Thoma; Ibrahim Sultan
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-07-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.