Literature DB >> 31628927

Development, Validation, and Interpretation of the PROMIS Itch Questionnaire: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Quality of Life Impact of Itch.

Jonathan I Silverberg1, Jin-Shei Lai2, Robert W Kantor3, Prarthana Dalal4, Catherine Hickey4, Sara Shaunfield5, Karen Kaiser5, Helena Correia5, David Cella6.   

Abstract

Current patient-reported outcome measures for itch are limited and may not capture its full impact on health-related quality of life. We sought to develop, calibrate, and validate banks of questions assessing the health-related quality of life impact of itch as part of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. A systematic process of literature review, content-expert review, qualitative research, testing in a sample of 600 adults, classical test theory methods, and item response theory analyses were applied. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were followed by item response theory model and item fit analyses. Four itch-related item banks were developed: (i) general concerns, (ii) mood and sleep, (iii) clothing and physical activity, and (iv) scratching behavior. Item response theory and expert content review narrowed the item banks to 25, 18, 15, and 5 items, respectively. Validity of the item banks was supported by good convergent and discriminant validity with itch intensity, internal consistency, and no significant floor or ceiling effects. In conclusion, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Itch Questionnaire banks have excellent measurement properties and efficiently and comprehensively assess the burden of itch.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31628927     DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.08.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  5 in total

1.  Factor analysis of subjective descriptors of chronic pruritus and association with quality of life: A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Robin Rolader; Taryn M DeGrazia; Chao Zhang; Gil Yosipovitch; Suephy C Chen; Howa Yeung
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 2.  Itch: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic workup.

Authors:  Youkyung S Roh; Justin Choi; Nishadh Sutaria; Shawn G Kwatra
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Reliability and meaningful change of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® Itch Questionnaire (PIQ) item banks in adults with atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  J I Silverberg; J-S Lai; D Cella
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.113

4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Dashboards Within the Electronic Health Record to Support Shared Decision-making: Protocol for Co-design and Clinical Evaluation With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Laura M Perry; Victoria Morken; John D Peipert; Betina Yanez; Sofia F Garcia; Cynthia Barnard; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Jeffrey A Linder; Neil Jordan; Ronald T Ackermann; Alexandra Harris; Sheetal Kircher; Nisha Mohindra; Vikram Aggarwal; Rebecca Frazier; Ava Coughlin; Katy Bedjeti; Melissa Weitzel; Eugene C Nelson; Glyn Elwyn; Aricca D Van Citters; Mary O'Connor; David Cella
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  International observational atopic dermatitis cohort to follow natural history and treatment course: TARGET-DERM AD study design and rationale.

Authors:  Katrina Abuabara; Jonathan I Silverberg; Eric L Simpson; Amy S Paller; Lawrence F Eichenfield; Robert Bissonnette; James Krueger; John E Harris; Laura Dalfonso; Stephanie E Watkins; Julie M Crawford; D Thaçi; Emma Guttman-Yassky
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.