Literature DB >> 31628621

Assessing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic antireflux procedures for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Alexandros Andreou1, David I Watson2, Dimitrios Mavridis3,4, Nader K Francis5, Stavros A Antoniou6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive literature on laparoscopic antireflux surgery, comparative evidence across different procedures is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess and rank the most efficacious and safe laparoscopic procedures for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
METHODS: Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and OpenGrey databases were queried for randomized trials comparing two or more laparoscopic antireflux procedures with each other or with medical treatment for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for each pair of interventions using a random-effects model. Network meta-analysis was employed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of laparoscopic antireflux procedures for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
RESULTS: Forty-four publications reporting 29 randomized trials which included 1892 patients were identified. The network of treatments was sparse with only a closed loop between different types of wraps; 270°, 360°, anterior 180° and anterior 90°; and star network between 360° and other treatments; and between anterior 180° and other treatments. Laparoscopic 270° (odds ratio, OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.64-2.22), anterior 180°, and anterior 90° were equally effective as 360° for control of heartburn, although this finding was supported by low quality of evidence according to GRADE modification for NMA. The odds for dysphagia were lower after 270° (OR 0.38, 95%, CI 0.24-0.60), anterior 90° (moderate quality evidence), and anterior 180° (low-quality evidence) compared to 360°. The odds for gas-bloat were lower after 270° (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27, 0.95) and after anterior 90° compared to 360° (low-quality evidence). Regurgitation, morbidity, and reoperation were similar across treatments, albeit these were associated with very low-quality evidence.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic 270° fundoplication achieves a better outcome than 360° total fundoplication, especially in terms of postoperative dysphagia, although other types of partial fundoplication might be equally effective. REGISTRATION NO: CRD42017074783.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antireflux surgery; Fundoplication; GERD; Network meta-analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31628621     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07208-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  67 in total

1.  Esophageal motility in reflux disease before and after fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, clinical, and manometric study.

Authors:  C Fibbe; P Layer; J Keller; U Strate; A Emmermann; C Zornig
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Long-term symptom control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease 12 years after laparoscopic Nissen or 180° anterior partial fundoplication in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  D J Roks; J A Broeders; R J Baigrie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Nissen vs Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  C Zornig; U Strate; C Fibbe; A Emmermann; P Layer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication.

Authors:  R J Baigrie; S N R Cullis; A J Ndhluni; A Cariem
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton-pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D Mahon; M Rhodes; B Decadt; A Hindmarsh; R Lowndes; I Beckingham; B Koo; R G Newcombe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  John M Shaw; Philippus C Bornman; Marie D Callanan; Ian J Beckingham; David C Metz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility.

Authors:  U Strate; A Emmermann; C Fibbe; P Layer; C Zornig
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication: results of a randomized and multicenter trial.

Authors:  E Guérin; K Bétroune; J Closset; A Mehdi; J C Lefèbvre; J J Houben; M Gelin; P Vaneukem; I El Nakadi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.

Authors:  Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Dimitris Mavridis; Toshi A Furukawa; Andrea Cipriani; Andrea C Tricco; Sharon E Straus; George C M Siontis; Matthias Egger; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.

Authors:  Anna Chaimani; Julian P T Higgins; Dimitris Mavridis; Panagiota Spyridonos; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; Rebecca C Dirks; Danielle Walsh; Celeste Hollands; Lauren E Arthur; Noe Rodriguez; Joyce Jhang; Ahmed Abou-Setta; Aurora Pryor; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Excess Body Weight and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Andreas Thalheimer; Marco Bueter
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  Insight into the methodology and uptake of EAES guidelines: a qualitative analysis and survey by the EAES Consensus & Guideline Subcommittee.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Sofia Tsokani; Dimitrios Mavridis; Ferdinando Agresta; Manuel López-Cano; Filip E Muysoms; Salvador Morales-Conde; Hendrik-Jaap Bonjer; Thérèse van Veldhoven; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.