Sabine Kirchen Peters1, Elisabeth Krupp2. 1. Institut für Sozialforschung und Sozialwirtschaft e. V., Saarbrücken, Deutschland. kirchen-peters@iso-institut.de. 2. Institut für Sozialforschung und Sozialwirtschaft e. V., Saarbrücken, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Germany, the question arises as to why the dementia sensitivity of acute care hospitals is still so uncommon even though the first concepts were successfully tested more than 20 years ago. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to describe implementation barriers in an overview and to show ways to a better practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results presented are based on a document analysis, the evaluation of focus groups and network meetings as well as on interviews with experts within the framework of a study for the Robert Bosch Foundation. In addition, the results of an earlier investigation of the iso institut for the German Alzheimer Society are included. RESULTS: Based on the experience gained in model projects, typical barriers for a dementia-sensitive orientation on individual, work organizational and superordinate levels are described. The systematization of the barriers provides a starting point for overcoming these hurdles. In addition, a number of success factors for the implementation of good practice can be worked out from the projects. It has been found to be crucial to work on the attitude of staff towards people with cognitive impairments and to adapt processes to the special needs of this patient group. In this context, management and a professionally sound structuring of change processes play a key role. DISCUSSION: In the future, managers and employees in acute care hospitals will be able to find a wide range of suggestions in comprehensive guidelines from the iso-Institute on the modular implementation of dementia-sensitive hospitals, which is backed up by tried and tested and effective aids to action, instruments, process descriptions, etc. The guidelines will also be available in the form of a comprehensive list of recommendations.
BACKGROUND: In Germany, the question arises as to why the dementia sensitivity of acute care hospitals is still so uncommon even though the first concepts were successfully tested more than 20 years ago. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to describe implementation barriers in an overview and to show ways to a better practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results presented are based on a document analysis, the evaluation of focus groups and network meetings as well as on interviews with experts within the framework of a study for the Robert Bosch Foundation. In addition, the results of an earlier investigation of the iso institut for the German Alzheimer Society are included. RESULTS: Based on the experience gained in model projects, typical barriers for a dementia-sensitive orientation on individual, work organizational and superordinate levels are described. The systematization of the barriers provides a starting point for overcoming these hurdles. In addition, a number of success factors for the implementation of good practice can be worked out from the projects. It has been found to be crucial to work on the attitude of staff towards people with cognitive impairments and to adapt processes to the special needs of this patient group. In this context, management and a professionally sound structuring of change processes play a key role. DISCUSSION: In the future, managers and employees in acute care hospitals will be able to find a wide range of suggestions in comprehensive guidelines from the iso-Institute on the modular implementation of dementia-sensitive hospitals, which is backed up by tried and tested and effective aids to action, instruments, process descriptions, etc. The guidelines will also be available in the form of a comprehensive list of recommendations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Barriers; Cognitive impairments; Good clinical practice; Patient care; Program sustainability
Authors: F Kracht; M Boekholt; F Schumacher-Schönert; A Nikelski; N Chikhradze; P Lücker; H C Vollmar; W Hoffmann; S H Kreisel; J R Thyrian Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 3.921