Rachel L Denlinger-Apte1, Eric C Donny2, Bruce R Lindgren3, Nathan Rubin3, Christine Goodwin4, Teresa DeAtley5, Suzanne M Colby4, Patricia A Cioe4, Dorothy K Hatsukami3, Jennifer W Tidey4,5. 1. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 2. Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 3. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 5. Department of Behavioral and Social Science, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A nicotine reduction policy could have major benefits for smokers with serious mental illness (SMI). However, potential unintended consequences, such as compensatory smoking, should be considered to ensure that such a policy does not negatively affect this population. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to examine the impact of smoking very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes for six weeks on smoking topography characteristics, indicators of compensatory smoking, among smokers with SMI. METHODS: After a baseline usual brand smoking phase, smokers with SMI (N=58) were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive either VLNC (0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or normal nicotine content (NNC; 15.8 mg/g) research cigarettes for six weeks. During two study visits scheduled six weeks apart, participants smoked either their usual brand (baseline) or assigned study cigarettes (post-randomization) through a handheld smoking topography device. Univariate ANOVA compared smoking topography indices with cigarette condition (VLNC vs NNC) as the between-subjects factor with corresponding baseline topography results included as co-variates. RESULTS: At Week 6, participants in the VLNC condition smoked fewer puffs per cigarette and had shorter inter-puff intervals compared to participants in the NNC condition (p's < 0.05). There were no differences between research cigarette conditions at Week 6 for cigarette volume, puff volume, puff duration, peak flow rate, or carbon monoxide boost. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with acute VLNC cigarette topography studies and indicate that a nicotine reduction policy is unlikely to lead to compensation among smokers with SMI.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: A nicotine reduction policy could have major benefits for smokers with serious mental illness (SMI). However, potential unintended consequences, such as compensatory smoking, should be considered to ensure that such a policy does not negatively affect this population. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to examine the impact of smoking very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes for six weeks on smoking topography characteristics, indicators of compensatory smoking, among smokers with SMI. METHODS: After a baseline usual brand smoking phase, smokers with SMI (N=58) were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive either VLNC (0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco) or normal nicotine content (NNC; 15.8 mg/g) research cigarettes for six weeks. During two study visits scheduled six weeks apart, participants smoked either their usual brand (baseline) or assigned study cigarettes (post-randomization) through a handheld smoking topography device. Univariate ANOVA compared smoking topography indices with cigarette condition (VLNC vs NNC) as the between-subjects factor with corresponding baseline topography results included as co-variates. RESULTS: At Week 6, participants in the VLNC condition smoked fewer puffs per cigarette and had shorter inter-puff intervals compared to participants in the NNC condition (p's < 0.05). There were no differences between research cigarette conditions at Week 6 for cigarette volume, puff volume, puff duration, peak flow rate, or carbon monoxide boost. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with acute VLNC cigarette topography studies and indicate that a nicotine reduction policy is unlikely to lead to compensation among smokers with SMI.
Authors: Victor J Schneider; Nicholas Bush; Darya Vitus; Ryan W Carpenter; Michael Robinson; Jeff Boissoneault Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Melissa Mercincavage; Joshua L Karelitz; Catherine L Kreider; Valentina Souprountchouk; Benjamin Albelda; Andrew A Strasser Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Maggie M Sweitzer; Lauren R Pacek; Rachel V Kozink; Erin Locey; Scott H Kollins; Eric C Donny; F Joseph McClernon Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 4.415
Authors: Devan R Romero; Kim Pulvers; Erika Carter; Casey Barber; Nora Satybaldiyeva; Thomas E Novotny; Eyal Oren Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Lauren R Pacek; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Dana Mowls Carroll Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer W Tidey; Joshua E Muscat; Jonathan Foulds; A Eden Evins; Diann E Gaalema; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.244