| Literature DB >> 31628373 |
Dragos G Zaharescu1,2,3, Carmen I Burghelea4, Katerina Dontsova4,5, Jennifer K Presler4, Edward A Hunt4, Kenneth J Domanik6, Mary K Amistadi7, Shana Sandhaus4,8, Elise N Munoz4,8, Emily E Gaddis4,9, Miranda Galey4,10, María O Vaquera-Ibarra4,11, Maria A Palacios-Menendez4,12, Ricardo Castrejón-Martinez4,13, Estefanía C Roldán-Nicolau4,13, Kexin Li4,14, Raina M Maier5, Christopher T Reinhard15,16, Jon Chorover4,5.
Abstract
Ecosystem-bedrock interactions power the biogeochemical cycles of Earth's shallow crust, supporting life, stimulating substrate transformation, and spurring evolutionary innovation. While oxidative processes have dominated half of terrestrial history, the relative contribution of the biosphere and its chemical fingerprints on Earth's developing regolith are still poorly constrained. Here, we report results from a two-year incipient weathering experiment. We found that the mass release and compartmentalization of major elements during weathering of granite, rhyolite, schist and basalt was rock-specific and regulated by ecosystem components. A tight interplay between physiological needs of different biota, mineral dissolution rates, and substrate nutrient availability resulted in intricate elemental distribution patterns. Biota accelerated CO2 mineralization over abiotic controls as ecosystem complexity increased, and significantly modified the stoichiometry of mobilized elements. Microbial and fungal components inhibited element leaching (23.4% and 7%), while plants increased leaching and biomass retention by 63.4%. All biota left comparable biosignatures in the dissolved weathering products. Nevertheless, the magnitude and allocation of weathered fractions under abiotic and biotic treatments provide quantitative evidence for the role of major biosphere components in the evolution of upper continental crust, presenting critical information for large-scale biogeochemical models and for the search for stable in situ biosignatures beyond Earth.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31628373 PMCID: PMC6800431 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51274-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Physical and mineralogical differences among unreacted substrates. Physical features of the unprocessed (left) and processed (center, scale in mm) rocks used as experimental substrates. Right, electron microprobe X-ray reflectance images showing elemental distribution in the granular material. Inset in basalt (center) is a stereomicroscope image depicting 1 µm-thick mycorrhiza hyphae connecting plant roots (not imaged) to rock particles.
Figure 2Cumulative fractional removal in the dissolved load. Time-lapse trends of cation fractional leaching from rock substrate in pore water over the two-year weathering experiment (X axis in days). Values represent cumulative column means of total element loss in pore water per sampling event as a fraction of the total (molar) mass of a given element present in rock at the beginning of each experiments. Treatments are: (C) control, (B) bacteria, (BG) bacteria - grass, (BGM) bacteria - grass - mycorrhiza. Error bars (+/−2 SE of column triplicate) and color-coding are for all plots. N = 60 sampling events.
Figure 3Substrate and biotic effects on cation export in pore water. (A) Rock-normalized total denudation (preferential leaching) of major cations in pore water in un-inoculated control, summed across the 60 sampling events, and (B–E) across biological treatments in the 4 tested rocks. Means and standard errors are calculated from column triplicates. Excessive Mn SE bars are due to one triplicate displaying consistently high values throughout the sampling period. Elements are arranged in order of decreasing values.
Figure 4Preferential plant uptake. Water-normalized element uptake in plant (root and shoot) with (GBM) and without (GB) arbuscular mycorrhiza, on different rock substrates. Treatment effect is significant at **+/−2SE and *+/−1 SE levels.
Figure 5Formation and preservation of biological signatures. Effect of different ecosystem components on incongruent leaching and retention of elements in water (top), exchangeable (middle) and poorly crystalline (bottom) fractions, at the end of the two – year experiment, as measured by the Biological Signature Index (E s.1). Horizontal line is set at abiotic control. Treatment effect is significant at 99.5% level (Fisher’s least significant difference, ANOVA) for *B vs. C, *GB vs. B, *GBM vs. GB comparisons.
Figure 6Fractional compartmentalization of biological weathering products in basalt and rhyolite. Cation distribution in biomass, aqueous, exchangeable, poorly crystalline, and residual pools across the four biotic treatments after two years of biological weathering. Aqueous values are means of treatment triplicates summed across the 60 sampling events. Solid fraction and biota were analyzed at the end of the experiment. T = 0, initial rock. Treatments: C, control; B, microbes; BG, microbes-grass; BGM, microbes-grass-arbuscular mycorrhyza.
Figure 7Fractional compartmentalization of biological weathering products in granite and schist. Percent fractionation of major rock cations in liquid, solid and biological phases among the four biotic treatments. Water values represent means of treatment triplicates summed across the 60 sampling events (603 days experimental period). Solid fraction and biota were analyzed at the end of the experiment. C, control; B, microbes; BG, microbes-grass; BGM, microbes-grass-arbuscular mycorrhyza; T = 0, initial rock.