| Literature DB >> 31627264 |
Shao-Lun Zhai1, Dian-Hong Lv2, Zhi-Hong Xu3, Jie-Shi Yu4, Xiao-Hui Wen5, He Zhang6, Qin-Ling Chen7, Chun-Ling Jia8, Xiu-Rong Zhou9, Qi Zhai10, Feng Li11, Patrick C Y Woo12,13,14, Susanna K P Lau15,16,17, Dan Wang18, Wen-Kang Wei19.
Abstract
Enzootic nasal tumor virus (ENTV) has two types, ENTV-1 in sheep and ENTV-2 in goats, respectively. In China, the incidence of ENTV-2 related diseases has increased year by year. In this study, we reported an outbreak of ENTV-2 in a commercial goat farm in Qingyuan city, Guangdong province, southern China. A full-length genome of ENTV-2 (designated GDQY2017), with 7479 base pairs, was sequenced. Although GDQY2017 shared the highest nucleotide identity with a Chinese ENTV-2 isolate (ENTV-2CHN4, GenBank accession number KU258873), it possesses distinct genome characteristics undescribed, including a non-continuous 21-nucleotide insertion in the gag gene and a non-continuous 12-nucleotide deletion in the env gene. Notably, most of these indel nucleotide sequences were originated from a Chinese jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) isolate (GenBank accession number DQ838494). In the gag and env genes, GDQY2017 was phylogenetically related to those Chinese ENTV-2 isolates and a Chinese JSRV isolate (DQ838494). For GDQY2017-like viruses, more surveillance work should be made to explain their pathogenicity in goat herds. To our knowledge, this study represents the first to demonstrate the circulating pattern of ENTV-2 in Guangdong province, China, which will help to better understand the epidemiology and genetic diversity of ENTV-2.Entities:
Keywords: ENTV-2; Guangdong province; enzootic nasal tumor virus; genetic diversity; goats; novel variation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31627264 PMCID: PMC6832284 DOI: 10.3390/v11100956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Clinical manifestations and pathological changes of goats affected by enzootic nasal tumor virus (ENTV)-2. (a) Bloody polyps appeared around the nostrils of a goat’s nose (Goat 1, about 3-month-old). (b) A lot of nasal discharge appeared around the nose (Goat 2, about 10-month-old). (c) The nasal cavity (Goat 3, about one-year-old) filled with tumor-like tissues.
Primers used in this study.
| Primer | Primer Sequence(5′-3′) | Location | Product Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1F | ACAAGGCATCAGCCATTTTGGTCTGATCCTCTCAACCCCA | 1–40 | |
| 1R | AGGAGGAGGAGCATCATAACCAGGCTCTGGGTCAGGAATA | 627–588 | 627 bp |
| 2F | GTTTTCCTCGCCACTACTCTTG | 151–172 | |
| 2R | TACCCAATAAGCGTCGGATGAT | 2399–2378 | 2249 bp |
| 3F | CACTCCTAATTTGTGCCCACG | 1848–1869 | |
| 3R | GGCCACTGATCGACCCATAC | 2934–2915 | 1087 bp |
| 4F | GAAGAGGTTTGGGGTGTTTTCCCTAGGGACCTCTGATTCTCCTGTGAC | 2830–2878 | |
| 4R | GTTTAAGACGTTGATGAGCTCGTTCTACAATCCCTTGTCCCTGTGGGT | 5087–5040 | 2258 bp |
| 5F | AGAACGAGCTCATCAACGTCTTAAACATCAACT | 5062–5094 | |
| 5R | CTTGTTGTTTTATTGTGTCATAGTATATAT | 7440–7411 | 2379 bp |
Figure 2Microscopic feature of tumor tissues in goat 3. There were some different sizes of secretory glandular structures and a lot of interstitial epithelioid cells (labeled by the red arrows) in the figure (Bar = 100 μm).
Similarity (%) of GDQY2017 with other reference retroviruses in goats and sheep.
| Isolation (GenBank No.) | Complete Genome | gag Protein | env Protein | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JSRV (M80216) | 88.2% | 86.6% | 88.9% | 85.9% | 89.4% |
| JSRV21 (AF105220) | 88.2% | 86.1% | 89.4% | 86.2% | 89.7% |
| sheep C1 China 2013 G1 (KP691837) | 87.6% | 85.7% | 89.1% | 85.8% | 89.2% |
| JSRV (DQ838494) | 92.2% | 93.6% | 87.7% | 93.6% | 92.2% |
| sheep TNO28 (Y16627) | 88.4% | 87.7% | 89.7% | 87.7% | 88.2% |
| ENTV-1NA1 (GU292317) | 88.2% | 87.5% | 89.4% | 87.8% | 87.9% |
| ENTV-1NA2 (GU292315) | 88.2% | 87.9% | 89.4% | 87.7% | 88.2% |
| ENTV-1NA3 (GU292318) | 88.2% | 87.7% | 89.3% | 87.6% | 88.2% |
| ENTV-1NA4 (FJ744146) | 88.2% | 87.8% | 89.3% | 87.6% | 88.1% |
| ENTV-1NA5 (GU292316) | 88.2% | 87.8% | 89.3% | 87.7% | 88.2% |
| ENTV-1NA6 (FJ744149) | 88.4% | 87.9% | 89.4% | 87.8% | 88.1% |
| ENTV-1NA7 (FJ744150) | 88.4% | 87.9% | 89.4% | 87.8% | 88.1% |
| ENTV-1NA8 (FJ744147) | 88.3% | 87.8% | 89.6% | 87.8% | 88.1% |
| ENTV-1NA9 (FJ744148) | 88.3% | 87.8% | 89.6% | 87.7% | 88.2% |
| ENTV-1NA10 (GU292314) | 88.2% | 88% | 89.6% | 87.5% | 88.1% |
| ENTV-1OVC (KC189895) | 88.2% | 87.7% | 89.4% | 87.7% | 88.2% |
| ENTV2 (AY197548) | 88.2% | 87.2% | 88.6% | 91.2% | 89.8% |
| Shaanxi (KU179192) | 91.9% | 86.7% | 88.7% | 89.1% | 91% |
| Shaanxi2 (KU980910) | 92% | 86.6% | 88.7% | 89.1% | 91% |
| Shaanxi3 (KU980911) | 92.2% | 87.2% | 88.9% | 89.2% | 91.1% |
| Shaanxi4 (KU980912) | 91.8% | 86.7% | 88.7% | 89.1% | 91% |
| CQ1 (MK164400) | 92.7% | 86.6% | 88.3% | 90.8% | 90.5% |
| ENTV-SC (HM104174) | 90.9% | 86.5% | 88.3% | 89% | 90.8% |
| ENTV-2CHN1 (KU258870) | 95.7% | 96.3% | 94.9% | 93.3% | 92.4% |
| ENTV-2CHN2 (KU258871) | 96% | 95.8% | 93.3% | 93.3% | 91.6% |
| ENTV-2CHN3 (KU258872) | 95.8% | 95.9% | 94.1% | 93.5% | 92.2% |
| ENTV-2CHN4 (KU258873) | 96.6% | 96.8% | 94.9% | 94.8% | 93.7% |
| ENTV-2CHN5 (KU258874) | 95.2% | 96% | 93.5% | 91.7% | 91.6% |
| ENTV-2CHN6 (KU258875) | 94.7% | 96.8% | 95.1% | 92.1% | 93.1% |
| ENTV-2CHN7 (KU258876) | 94.4% | 95.5% | 95.1% | 90.3% | 93.9% |
| ENTV-2CHN8 (KU258877) | 95% | 96.6% | 94.9% | 90.4% | 93.5% |
| ENTV-2CHN9 (KU258878) | 92.6% | 95.9% | 93.3% | 90.3% | 93.4% |
| ENTV-2CHN10 (KU258879) | 93.3% | 96.1% | 93.6% | 90.1% | 93.2% |
| ENTV-2CHN11 (KU258880) | 92.2% | 95.6% | 95.1% | 90.3% | 93.4% |
| enJSRV-1 (EF680311) | 94.6% | 95.1% | 94.5% | -a | -a |
| enJSRV-16 (EF680300) | 93.3% | 91.6% | 91.4% | 94.6% | 94.3% |
| HamJ1 (MF175067) | 93.6% | 91.8% | 91.7% | 94.9% | 94.4% |
| KarM (MF175071) | 93.6% | 91.8% | 91.7% | 95% | 94.6% |
Note: a It means no comparability between enJSRV-1 and GDQY2017 because the env gene of enJSRV-1 was incomplete or uncertain. ENTV, enzootic nasal tumor virus; JSRV, jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus; enJSRV, endogenous JSRV.
Figure 3Multiple sequence alignment results of the gag gene of ENTV-2 with ENTV-1, jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV), and endogenous JSRV (enJSRV). The nucleotide insertion sites in the gag gene of GDQY2017 were marked with green color.
Figure 4Multiple sequence alignment results of the env gene of ENTV-2 with ENTV-1, JSRV, and enJSRV. The nucleotide deletion sites in the env gene of GDQY2017 were marked with green color. Moreover, compared to ENTV-2CHN1, GDQY2017 had an additional three-nucleotide deletion (marked with green color) in position 1839–1841 of the env gene.
Figure 5Multiple sequence alignment results of the gag protein of ENTV-2. The amino acid insertion sites (EGD-S-PPP) in the gag protein of GDQY2017 were marked with green color.
Figure 6Multiple sequence alignment results of the env protein of ENTV-2 with ENTV-1, JSRV, and enJSRV. The amino acid deletion sites in the env protein of GDQY2017 were marked with green color.
Figure 7Phylogenetic analysis of the gag gene of ENTV-2 with ENTV-1, JSRV, and enJSRV. GDQY2017 described in this study was marked with the red square.
Figure 8Phylogenetic analysis based on the env gene of ENTV-2 with ENTV-1 and JSRV. GDQY2017 described in this study was marked with the red square.