Literature DB >> 31627211

Contributions of foveal and non-foveal retina to the human eye's focusing response.

Vivek Labhishetty1, Steven A Cholewiak1, Martin S Banks1.   

Abstract

The human eye changes focus-accommodates-to minimize blur in the retinal image. Previous work has shown that stimulation of nonfoveal retina can produce accommodative responses when no competing stimulus is presented to the fovea. In everyday situations it is very common for the fovea and other parts of the retina to be stimulated simultaneously. We examined this situation by asking how nonfoveal retina contributes to accommodation when the fovea is also stimulated. There were three experimental conditions. (a) Real change in which stimuli of different sizes, centered on the fovea, were presented at different optical distances. Accommodation was, as expected, robust because there was no conflicting stimulation of other parts of the retina. (b) Simulated change, no conflict in which stimuli of different sizes, again centered on the fovea, were presented at different simulated distances using rendered chromatic blur. Accommodation was robust in this condition because there was no conflict between the central and peripheral stimuli. (c) Simulated change, conflict in which a central disk (of different diameters) was presented along with an abutting peripheral annulus. The disk and annulus underwent opposite changes in simulated distance. Here we observed a surprisingly consistent effect of the peripheral annulus. For example, when the diameter of the central stimulus was 8° (thereby stimulating the fovea and parafovea), the abutting peripheral annulus had a significant effect on accommodation. We discuss how these results may help us understand other situations in which nonfixated targets affect the ability to focus on a fixated target. We also discuss potential implications for the development of myopia and for foveated rendering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31627211     DOI: 10.1167/19.12.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  4 in total

1.  Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Vivek Labhishetty; Steven A Cholewiak; Austin Roorda; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Radial and Tangential Retinal Magnifications as Functions of Visual Field Angle Across Spherical, Oblate, and Prolate Retinal Profiles.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Martin S Banks; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus.

Authors:  Athanasios Panorgias; Stephanie Aigbe; Emily Jeong; Carles Otero; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.