Jacqueline M Barkoski1, Stefanie A Busgang2, Moira Bixby2, Deborah Bennett3, Rebecca J Schmidt4, Dana Boyd Barr5, Parinya Panuwet5, Chris Gennings2, Irva Hertz-Picciotto4. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California Davis (UC Davis), California, USA. Electronic address: jmbarkoski@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California Davis (UC Davis), California, USA. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California Davis (UC Davis), California, USA; UC Davis MIND (Medical Investigations of Neurodevelopmental Disorders) Institute, UC Davis, California, Davis, CA, USA. 5. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental phenols and parabens are endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with the potential to affect child neurodevelopment including autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Our aim was to assess whether exposure to environmental phenols and parabens during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of clinical ASD or other nontypical development (non-TD). METHODS: This study included mother-child pairs (N = 207) from the Markers of Autism Risks in Babies - Learning Early Signs (MARBLES) Cohort Study with urinary phenol and paraben metabolites analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) from repeated pregnancy urine samples. Because family recurrence risks in siblings are about 20%, MARBLES enrolls pregnant women who already had a child with ASD. Children were clinically assessed at 3 years of age and classified into 3 outcome categories: ASD, non-TD, or typically developing (TD). Single analyte analyses were conducted with trinomial logistic regression and weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression was used to test for mixture effects. RESULTS: Regression models were adjusted for pre-pregnancy body mass index, prenatal vitamin use (yes/no), homeowner status (yes/no), birth year, and child's sex. In single chemical analyses phenol exposures were not significantly associated with child's diagnosis. Mixture analyses using trinomial WQS regression showed a significantly increased risk of non-TD compared to TD (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.04) with overall greater prenatal phenol and paraben metabolites mixture. Results for ASD also showed an increased risk, but it was not significant. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to provide evidence that pregnancy environmental phenol exposures may increase the risk for non-TD in a high-risk population.
BACKGROUND: Environmental phenols and parabens are endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with the potential to affect child neurodevelopment including autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Our aim was to assess whether exposure to environmental phenols and parabens during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of clinical ASD or other nontypical development (non-TD). METHODS: This study included mother-child pairs (N = 207) from the Markers of Autism Risks in Babies - Learning Early Signs (MARBLES) Cohort Study with urinary phenol and paraben metabolites analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) from repeated pregnancy urine samples. Because family recurrence risks in siblings are about 20%, MARBLES enrolls pregnant women who already had a child with ASD. Children were clinically assessed at 3 years of age and classified into 3 outcome categories: ASD, non-TD, or typically developing (TD). Single analyte analyses were conducted with trinomial logistic regression and weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression was used to test for mixture effects. RESULTS: Regression models were adjusted for pre-pregnancy body mass index, prenatal vitamin use (yes/no), homeowner status (yes/no), birth year, and child's sex. In single chemical analyses phenol exposures were not significantly associated with child's diagnosis. Mixture analyses using trinomial WQS regression showed a significantly increased risk of non-TD compared to TD (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.04) with overall greater prenatal phenol and paraben metabolites mixture. Results for ASD also showed an increased risk, but it was not significant. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to provide evidence that pregnancy environmental phenol exposures may increase the risk for non-TD in a high-risk population.
Authors: Sally Ozonoff; Gregory S Young; Alice Carter; Daniel Messinger; Nurit Yirmiya; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Susan Bryson; Leslie J Carver; John N Constantino; Karen Dobkins; Ted Hutman; Jana M Iverson; Rebecca Landa; Sally J Rogers; Marian Sigman; Wendy L Stone Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kim G Harley; Robert B Gunier; Katherine Kogut; Caroline Johnson; Asa Bradman; Antonia M Calafat; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Environ Res Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Joe M Braun; Allan C Just; Paige L Williams; Kristen W Smith; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Jacqueline Barkoski; Deborah Bennett; Daniel Tancredi; Dana Boyd Barr; William Elms; Irva Hertz-Picciotto Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Frederica Perera; Julia Vishnevetsky; Julie B Herbstman; Antonia M Calafat; Wei Xiong; Virginia Rauh; Shuang Wang Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jennifer F Bobb; Linda Valeri; Birgit Claus Henn; David C Christiani; Robert O Wright; Maitreyi Mazumdar; John J Godleski; Brent A Coull Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Eric M Roberts; Paul B English; Judith K Grether; Gayle C Windham; Lucia Somberg; Craig Wolff Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Deborah H Bennett; Stefanie A Busgang; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Patrick J Parsons; Mari Takazawa; Christopher D Palmer; Rebecca J Schmidt; John T Doucette; Julie B Schweitzer; Chris Gennings; Irva Hertz-Picciotto Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 13.352
Authors: Julie Bang Hansen; Niels Bilenberg; Clara Amalie Gade Timmermann; Richard Christian Jensen; Hanne Frederiksen; Anna-Maria Andersson; Henriette Boye Kyhl; Tina Kold Jensen Journal: Environ Health Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Drew B Day; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Kaja Z LeWinn; Catherine J Karr; W Alex Mason; Adam A Szpiro Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 11.035
Authors: Jonathan A Hollander; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Felice N Jacka; Steven T Szabo; Tomás R Guilarte; Staci D Bilbo; Carolyn J Mattingly; Sheryl S Moy; Ebrahim Haroon; Mady Hornig; Edward D Levin; Mikhail V Pletnikov; Julia L Zehr; Kimberly A McAllister; Anika L Dzierlenga; Amanda E Garton; Cindy P Lawler; Christine Ladd-Acosta Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 8.294