| Literature DB >> 31626634 |
Tomoki Mori1, Saki Nakata2, Shigeyuki Izumiyama3.
Abstract
The food habits of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) are well studied, but there is a little evidence of dietary specialization-that is, when individuals use a narrower set of resources compared to the population as a whole. To examine the dietary composition at the individual level, seasonal patterns of dietary specialization, and sex-based dietary differences in Asiatic black bears, we attached Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to 15 Asiatic black bears and collected their scats in Nagano Prefecture, Japan from 2017 to 2018. Our results showed that the dietary composition differed among individuals, although seasonal changes in dietary composition were observed at the population level. Dietary specialization was high in summer (resources less abundant) and low in spring and autumn (resources more abundant), indicating a relationship with general food abundance and the dietary diversity of bears. In spring, all bears consumed green vegetation and/or seed of Fagaceae family from previous autumn; in early- and late- summer, dietary composition, such as green vegetation, insects, and fruits, greatly differed among individuals. In autumn, most bears heavily depended on seeds of Fagaceae which is high-quality food for bears. Although we did not find statistical differences between sexes in terms of dietary specialization and diversity, we found variations in the timing of feeding on the Fagaceae family, being earlier in females compared with males. We also found considerable variation in dietary composition within sexes, suggesting that dietary specialization depends on multiple factors besides food abundance, food diversity, and sex.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31626634 PMCID: PMC6799952 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study area in Nagano Prefecture, Japan.
Black circles indicate the capture site of the GPS-collared Asiatic black bears.
List of GPS collared Asiatic black bears and their sex, age, body mass, and sampling periods in Nagano Prefecture, Japan (2017–2018).
| ID | Sex | Age | Body | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | Early | Late | Autumn | Spring | Early | Late | Autumn | ||||
| M01 | M | 8 | 60kg | ||||||||
| M02 | M | 6 | 41kg | ||||||||
| M03 | M | 6 | 51kg | ||||||||
| M04 | M | 12 | 82kg | ||||||||
| M05 | M | 17 | 78kg | ||||||||
| M06 | M | 7 | 53kg | ||||||||
| M07 | M | 18 | 116kg | ||||||||
| F01 | F | 14 | 55kg | ||||||||
| F02 | F | 5 | 35kg | ||||||||
| F03 | F | 23 | 45kg | ||||||||
| F04 | F | 15 | 36kg | ||||||||
| F05 | F | 14 | 45kg | ||||||||
| F06 | F | 5 | 39kg | ||||||||
| F07 | F | 10 | 52kg | ||||||||
| F08 | F | 8 | 42kg | ||||||||
| Number of male bears | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |||
| Number of female bears | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | |||
| Total number of bears | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 9 | |||
White circles indicate normally operated collars and that we could collect bears' scats; black circles indicate normally operated collars but we were unable to collect any bears' scats because of several difficulties such as collar malfunction, satellite communication error, and labor constrains.
aindicate estimated ages because we were unable to determinate the exact age.
Results of the model selection for PSI (A) and (B) Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H’) based on sex, season, and year.
The candidate models (ΔAIC < 2) were ordered according to Akaike information criteria (AIC).
| Estimate (SE) | Estimate (SE) | Estimate (SE) | |
| Intercept | 2.65 (1.08) | 2.74 (1.13) | 2.78 (1.22) |
| Season (ref: autumn) | |||
| spring | –0.95 (1.50) | –0.93 (1.51) | –0.93 (1.50) |
| early-summer | –2.36 (1.36) | –2.41 (1.37) | –2.36 (1.36) |
| late-summer | –2.53 (1.20) | –2.54 (1.20) | –2.52 (1.20) |
| Sex (ref: male) | –0.24 (0.83) | ||
| Year (ref: 2018) | –0.20 (0.85) | ||
| df | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| AIC | 13.41 | 15.33 | 15.35 |
| ΔAIC | 0.00 | 1.92 | 1.94 |
| | |||
| Estimate (SE) | Estimate (SE) | Estimate (SE) | |
| Intercept | 0.15 (0.11) | 0.23 (0.12) | 0.15 (0.14) |
| Season (ref: autumn) | |||
| spring | 0.13 (0.12) | 0.16 (0.12) | 0.13 (0.12) |
| early-summer | 0.40 (0.13) | 0.42 (0.12) | 0.40 (0.13) |
| late-summer | 0.89 (0.09) | 0.91 (0.09) | 0.89 (0.09) |
| Sex (ref: male) | –0.01 (0.19) | ||
| Year (ref: 2018) | –0.13 (0.09) | ||
| df | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| AIC | 74.23 | 74.43 | 76.22 |
| ΔAIC | 0.00 | 0.20 | 1.99 |
aindicates significant at P < 0.05
bindicates significant trends at 0.05 < P < 0.1
Fig 2(A) PSI and (B) Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H’) for foods used by Asiatic black bears in Nagano Prefecture, Japan from 2017–2018. PSI, proportion similarity index.
Fig 3Seasonal dietary composition of 15 Asiatic black bears in Nagano Prefecture, Japan (2017–2018).
The numbers in parentheses on the x axis show the number of scat samples for each bear.
Seasonal and sexual variations in dietary composition determined from six major food categories for Asiatic black bears in Nagano Prefecture, Japan (2017–2018).
| Green | Fleshy | Hard mast | Hard mast | Animal | Crops | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | M(2) | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| F (1) | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Early-summer | M (0) | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F (2) | 65.0 ± 35.0 | 34.0 ± 34.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Late-summer | M (2) | 5.3 ± 4.2 | 66.5 ± 32.4 | 2.7 ± 2.7 | 20.4 ± 20.4 | 5.1 ± 5.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| F (4) | 26.2 ± 22.1 | 26.2 ± 6.3 | 41.1 ± 23.7 | 4.8 ± 5.0 | 1.8 ± 2.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Autumn | M (1) | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 98.5 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
| F (4) | 4.2 ± 4.1 | 0.1± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 6.1 | 82.0 ± 11.6 | 3.8 ± 4.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Spring | M (2) | 66.9 ± 32.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 33.0 ± 32.7 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| F (3) | 79.5 ± 16.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 20.5 ± 16.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Early-summer | M (3) | 79.4 ± 7.1 | 10.3 ± 9.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 10.3 ± 2.8 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| F (3) | 31.7 ± 27.4 | 28.0 ± 31.3 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 40.3 ± 30.1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Late-summer | M (4) | 24.4 ± 15.1 | 8.2 ± 4.6 | 27.8 ± 26.5 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 38.8 ± 40.7 |
| F (6) | 26.0 ± 28.5 | 17.5 ± 14.3 | 27.8 ± 15.7 | 18.3 ± 24.3 | 2.6 ± 4.4 | 7.7 ± 17.1 | |
| Autumn | M (4) | 0.9 ± 1.5 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.0 ± 0.1 | 98.9 ± 1.9 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| F (5) | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 5.3 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 96.4 ± 5.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
Mean values±standard deviations are arranged.
F; female, M; male.
Numbers in parentheses are the number of bears per category.