Literature DB >> 31626005

Graft Diameter and Graft Type as Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision: A Cohort Study Including 18,425 Patients from the Swedish and Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registries.

Thorkell Snaebjörnsson1,2, Eric Hamrin-Senorski3, Eleonor Svantesson1, Louise Karlsson1, Lars Engebretsen4, Jon Karlsson1,2, Kristian Samuelsson1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important to investigate and compare graft diameters as well as graft types to identify risk factors for revision after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We performed the current study in order to analyze the early ACL revision rate among patients treated with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts or patellar tendon (PT) autografts of different diameters. Our hypothesis was that an increase in both HT and PT autograft diameters would reduce the risk of early ACL revision.
METHODS: This retrospective study was based on prospectively collected data from the national knee ligament registries of Norway and Sweden and included patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction during the period of 2004 through 2014. The primary end point was the 2-year incidence of ACL revision. The impact of graft type and diameter on the incidence of revision surgery was reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), estimated by using generalized linear models with a binomial distribution and log-link function.
RESULTS: Of 58,692 patients identified, a total of 18,425 patients were included in this study. The 2-year rate of ACL revision was 2.10% (PT autografts, 2.63%; HT autografts, 2.08%; RR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.60 to 1.45]). There was an increased risk of ACL revision among patients treated with HT autografts with a diameter of <8 mm compared with larger HT autografts (RR = 1.25 [95% CI = 1.01 to 1.57]). Patients treated with HT autografts with a diameter of ≥9.0 mm or ≥10.0 mm had a reduced risk of early ACL revision compared with patients treated with PT autografts.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with larger-diameter HT autografts had a lower risk of early ACL revision compared with those treated with HT autografts of <8 mm. Patients treated with HT autografts of ≥9 or ≥10 mm had a reduced risk of early ACL revision compared with patients treated with PT autografts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31626005     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery.

Authors:  Danilo Menghini; Shankar G Kaushal; Sean W Flannery; Kirsten Ecklund; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming; Ata M Kiapour; Benedikt Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-14

3.  Influence of hamstring autograft diameter on graft failure rate in Chinese population after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen Pui-Kit Tang; Keith Hay-Man Wan; Richard Hin-Lun Lee; Kevin Kwun-Hung Wong; Kam-Kwong Wong
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-08-12

4.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Length in Pediatric Populations: An MRI Study.

Authors:  Emily P Tran; Aleksei B Dingel; E Bailey Terhune; Nicole A Segovia; Brian Vuong; Theodore J Ganley; Peter D Fabricant; Daniel W Green; Tyler J Stavinoha; Kevin G Shea
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 107 Competitive Wrestlers: Outcomes, Reoperations, and Return to Play at 6-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Erick M Marigi; Bryant M Song; Jory N Wasserburger; Christopher L Camp; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Kelechi R Okoroha; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 6.  Scoping Review on ACL Surgery and Registry Data.

Authors:  Janina Kaarre; Bálint Zsidai; Eric Narup; Alexandra Horvath; Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Alberto Grassi; Volker Musahl; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-13

7.  The German Arthroscopy Registry DART: what has happened after 5 years?

Authors:  Maximilian Hinz; Christoph Lutter; Ralf Mueller-Rath; Philipp Niemeyer; Oliver Miltner; Thomas Tischer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates.

Authors:  R Kyle Martin; Andreas Persson; Gilbert Moatshe; Anne Marie Fenstad; Lars Engebretsen; Jon Olav Drogset; Håvard Visnes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 9.  Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar; Amirhossein Erfani; Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Age, time from injury to surgery and quadriceps strength affect the risk of revision surgery after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Riccardo Cristiani; Magnus Forssblad; Gunnar Edman; Karl Eriksson; Anders Stålman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.