Reshma Jagsi1, Olivia Means, Diana Lautenberger, Rochelle D Jones, Kent A Griffith, Terence R Flotte, Lynn K Gordon, Kathryn M Rexrode, Lori W Wagner, Archana Chatterjee. 1. R. Jagsi is professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-1228. O. Means is a resident in plastic surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan. D. Lautenberger is director, Women in Medicine and Science, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. R.D. Jones is research area specialist intermediate, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. K.A. Griffith is statistician expert, Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. T.R. Flotte is the Celia and Isaac Haidak Professor, and dean, School of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. L.K. Gordon is professor of ophthalmology and senior associate dean, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4495-8830. K.M. Rexrode is chief, Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, and associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-8429. L.W. Wagner is professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-9103. A. Chatterjee is professor and chair, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine/Sanford Children's Specialty Clinic, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Abstract
PURPOSE: National medical specialty societies speak for their respective fields in policy debates, influence research, affect trainees' specialization decisions, provide career development opportunities, and confer awards and recognitions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the gender demographics of society members and leaders. METHOD: In 2016, the Group on Women in Medicine and Science (of the Association of American Medical Colleges) sought to characterize the gender of members and leaders of specialty societies from 2000 to 2015. This report provides descriptive data, including how many of the responding societies (representing each of 30 major medical specialties) had substantial (> 10%) increases in women's representation among leadership between the first and second halves of the study period. RESULTS: The average proportion of full members who were female in responding societies was 25.4% in 2005 and 29.3% in 2015. The proportion of women among those serving as the highest-ranking elected leader between 2000 and 2015 in each specialty ranged from 0% to 37.5% (mean, 15.8%). The mean proportion of women on governing boards ranged from 0% to 37.3% (mean of means, 18.8%) in 2000-2007 and from 0% to 47.6% (mean of means, 25.2%) in 2008-2015. In 9 specialties, the mean percentage of women serving on governing boards increased by over 10% from the first to the second half of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although many women are full members of specialty societies, women still constitute a minority of leaders. This report establishes a baseline from which to evaluate the effect of societies' efforts to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion.
PURPOSE: National medical specialty societies speak for their respective fields in policy debates, influence research, affect trainees' specialization decisions, provide career development opportunities, and confer awards and recognitions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the gender demographics of society members and leaders. METHOD: In 2016, the Group on Women in Medicine and Science (of the Association of American Medical Colleges) sought to characterize the gender of members and leaders of specialty societies from 2000 to 2015. This report provides descriptive data, including how many of the responding societies (representing each of 30 major medical specialties) had substantial (> 10%) increases in women's representation among leadership between the first and second halves of the study period. RESULTS: The average proportion of full members who were female in responding societies was 25.4% in 2005 and 29.3% in 2015. The proportion of women among those serving as the highest-ranking elected leader between 2000 and 2015 in each specialty ranged from 0% to 37.5% (mean, 15.8%). The mean proportion of women on governing boards ranged from 0% to 37.3% (mean of means, 18.8%) in 2000-2007 and from 0% to 47.6% (mean of means, 25.2%) in 2008-2015. In 9 specialties, the mean percentage of women serving on governing boards increased by over 10% from the first to the second half of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although many women are full members of specialty societies, women still constitute a minority of leaders. This report establishes a baseline from which to evaluate the effect of societies' efforts to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Authors: Jessica A Gold; Danielle Roubinov; Lena S Jia; Kent A Griffith; John M Carethers; Christina Mangurian; Reshma Jagsi Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Caryn Lerman; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Mary Falcone; David M Gosky; Roy A Jensen; Kelvin P Lee; Edith Mitchell; Kunle Odunsi; Jennifer W Pegher; Elisa Rodriguez; Yolanda Sanchez; Reuben Shaw; George Weiner; Cheryl L Willman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Michelle I Cardel; Matthew S Loop; Andrew W Brown; Michelle M Bohan Brown; Faith Newsome; Lorraine Scott; Dominick J Lemas; Rebecca A Krukowski Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: R Sterling Haring; Leslie K Rydberg; Michael K Mallow; Patrick Kortebein; Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Rocío E Hernández-Ruiz; Eva M Rosel-Gallardo; Carolina Cifuentes-Jiménez; Santiago González-López; María Victoria Bolaños-Carmona Journal: Inquiry Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 2.099