Literature DB >> 31625814

The Evidence and Controversy Between Dietary Calcium Intake and Calcium Supplementation and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Chao Yang1, Xiangling Shi1, Hui Xia1, Xian Yang1, Hechun Liu1, Da Pan1, Guiju Sun1.   

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to synthesize both trial and observational studies and undertake a meta-analysis to explore the associations between calcium from dietary and supplemental intakes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks.
Methods: Data sources were from PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science, published from the inception dates up to March 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies with data on dietary or supplemental intake of calcium, with or without vitamin D, and cardiovascular outcomes, were included.
Results: Of the 1,212 identified studies, 26 prospective cohort studies and 16 RCTs were included. Results of cohort studies reveled that dietary calcium intakes (DCIs) ranging from 200 to 1500 mg/d did not affect the risk of CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke (relative risk (RR) RR for CVD = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.87-1.05; RR for CHD = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.08; RR for stroke = 0.94, 95% CI, 0.85-1.04). Pooled RR of RCTs showed that the risk of CHD due to calcium supplements (CSs) increased 8% (RR = 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; I2 = 0.0%) and increased 20% allocated to CSs alone (RR = 1.20, 95% CI, 1.08-1.33; I2 = 0.0%). CSs increased the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) by 14% (RR = 1.14, 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; I2 = 0.0%), and CSs alone increased the MI risk 21% (RR = 1.21, 95% CI, 1.08-1.35; I2 = 0.0%).Conclusions: We concluded that calcium intake from dietary sources do not adequately increase the risk of CVD including CHD and stroke, while calcium supplements might raise CHD risk, especially MI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary calcium; calcium supplementation; cardiovascular disease; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31625814     DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2019.1649219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr        ISSN: 0731-5724            Impact factor:   3.169


  9 in total

1.  Calcium supplements: Good for the bone, bad for the heart? A systematic updated appraisal.

Authors:  Marco B Morelli; Gaetano Santulli; Jessica Gambardella
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 2.  Role of diet in stroke incidence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective observational studies.

Authors:  Na Guo; Ying Zhu; Dandan Tian; Yating Zhao; Chenguang Zhang; Changqing Mu; Chen Han; Ruixia Zhu; Xu Liu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 11.150

Review 3.  Assessment of Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs.

Authors:  N R Fuggle; C Cooper; N C Harvey; N Al-Daghri; M-L Brandi; O Bruyere; A Cano; E M Dennison; A Diez-Perez; J-M Kaufman; S Palacios; D Prieto-Alhambra; S Rozenberg; T Thomas; F Tremollieres; R Rizzoli; J A Kanis; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Altered serum calcium homeostasis independently predicts mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Wen Su; Jie-Gao Zhu; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Hui Chen; Wei-Ping Li; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Practical, Evidence-Based Approaches to Nutritional Modifications to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An American Society For Preventive Cardiology Clinical Practice Statement.

Authors:  Danielle Belardo; Erin D Michos; Ron Blankstein; Roger S Blumenthal; Keith C Ferdinand; Kevin Hall; Kevin Klatt; Pradeep Natajaran; Robert J Ostfeld; Koushik Reddy; Renee Rodriguez; Urshila Sriram; Deirdre K Tobias; Martha Gulati
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-02

6.  Global Variations in the Mineral Content of Bottled Still and Sparkling Water and a Description of the Possible Impact on Nephrological and Urological Diseases.

Authors:  Simone J M Stoots; Guido M Kamphuis; Rob Geraghty; Liffert Vogt; Michaël M E L Henderickx; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Sufyan Ibrahim; Amelia Pietropaolo; Enakshee Jamnadass; Sahar M Aljumaiah; Saeed B Hamri; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Olivier Traxer; Vineet Gauhar; Etienne X Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Otas Durutovic; Nariman K Gadzhiev; Laurian B Dragos; Tarik Emre Sener; Nick Rukin; Michele Talso; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Esteban Emiliani; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Kymora B Scotland; Naeem Bhojani; Athanasios Vagionis; Angela Piccirilli; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Cardiovascular safety of calcium, magnesium and strontium: what does the evidence say?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Cyrus Cooper; Nicholas C Harvey
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Dietary calcium intake in relation to type-2 diabetes and hyperglycemia in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Zahra Hajhashemy; Parisa Rouhani; Parvane Saneei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Calcium intake, calcium supplementation and cardiovascular disease and mortality in the British population: EPIC-norfolk prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiberiu A Pana; Mohsen Dehghani; Hamid Reza Baradaran; Samuel R Neal; Adrian D Wood; Chun Shing Kwok; Yoon K Loke; Robert N Luben; Mamas A Mamas; Kay-Tee Khaw; Phyo Kyaw Myint
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 8.082

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.